![]() |
||
|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
Internet Explorer 7
So I hear IE7 for WinXP is out, and its a very poor program with some very annoying bugs (most have to do things with slow sites or slow browsing speed, in which case it just cuts loading in half, resulting in broken images when browsing 4chan and thats pretty much it).
Browser wise its ie6 with an UI tweak, tabs, transparent PNG, many bugfixes and minor CSS improvements. But, it has exceptionally good security (pretty much no recent vulnerability were affected by it in the past half year while it was being developed), possibly due to the fact that by installing IE7, IE is seperated from the Windows Kernel. Gotta give Microsoft some props for that, even though the browser feels like its from 2002. Oya, and it will be put up on Autoupdate as a critical security update (which it is, ironically) from November. I can sympathize with that, and since it also has slightly improved CSS and transparent png support, this is a well needed forward move for the web. Forcing this on users is a justified evil since Microsoft is cleaning up 5 years of mess they created. So, I wonder, what does GFF think about this? Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Haven't tried it yet, but I heard as soon as it came out that there was a security flaw in it. My roomate has tried it and said he thinks it ok. Got some nice new browser enhancements.
Its nothing mindblowing however... ![]() How ya doing, buddy? |
And yea its nothing mindblowing - its how a browser should've looked in 2002. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Eh, IE7 is just an ugly (as ugly as the Devil's face) knockoff of Safari. It's good that they're trying to make it at least a LITTLE more standards-compliant, but I'm sure in true Microsoft fashion they'll make sure just enough is wrong that other browsers will have difficulties for websites that haven't been tested enough.
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
killmoms - Well, don't really.
Makin' trailers er'ry day. |
I have the IE 7 release candidate (I think it's RC2?,) installed, and while it's far better than IE 6, it still will never move me away from Firefox, especially since I've been using Firefox 2.0 RC2 (which is a much better upgrade than 1.0 and 1.5 were.) Internet Explorer can just continue playing catchup as far as I care. I was speaking idiomatically. |
The only reason I installed IE7 is to prevent any backdoors IE6 has had for years, and yet I find no compelling reason to use IE ever again. In fact I don't even use IE Tab for Firefox, it's my way of giving ActiveX and shit IE's html standards a big FU.
I see no purpose to even use ActiveX, unless you hate Java and think browser extensions should be able to access and modify any file on your hard drive. Most amazing jew boots
Last edited by Kaiten; Oct 21, 2006 at 10:52 PM.
|
I've read that IE7's sandbox mode only functions in Vista. Meaning that though it's probably still more secure than IE6 (which isn't saying much...) it's not correct to say that it's totally separate from the OS.
Or maybe evilboris meant something else when he said that it was separate, and I've just misunderstood him. In that case, sorry ^^;. FELIPE NO ![]() |
I don't think Microsoft will ever move to really separate IE (or at least it's core components) from the OS. They've invested too much in making it integral. They might sandbox certain instances, or take other measures to secure how it's tied into the underlying OS, but I don't think they'll ever REALLy separate it. They went to court over it, nearly got broken up, and then got away with it. Why would they stop now?
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?
killmoms - Well, don't really.
Makin' trailers er'ry day. |
Still not Standards Compliant, still not worth the bits it takes up on my hard drive.
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
I think they should stop making IE, no one uses it and all it does is crash, they should just bundle firefox with windows from now on imo, it's embarrassing watching them try to enhance it and it usually becoming more buggy.
There's nowhere I can't reach. ![]() |
The reality is that Microsoft will not give up on IE and it is the dominant browser in the market last I checked. Microsoft wants to assimilate us all by making us use bad software because it is waiting for us on our desktop when we install the OS. I think I'll be sticking with Firefox for a while. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Good Chocobo |
Anyone have any idea as to how to have links open in the current IE window but in a new tab. For example, in IE7 if I were to click my signature then a new window will open up rather than a new tab. Any ideas? :eyebrow:
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
As much as we all hate IE, it's good for all of us when it gets more secure, so hackers won't be able to compromise your stupid brother's PC and use that to launch an attack on the whole LAN. I was speaking idiomatically.
Last edited by Kaiten; Oct 22, 2006 at 09:01 PM.
|
The security thing isn't air talk either, for example no previous IE based exploit affected IE7 at all, during the beta phase. And just think about it - with 3 major browsers around (IE6, IE7, FF) around, all with different security buildups, threats will be more scarce then they are now. It's much more rewarding to search for exploits when a browser is used by 80% of the visitors, but after the automatic updates take place, that number will surely decrease. More diversity among browsers will cause less threats to appear for one browser from the many, thats common logic. Plus at least theres an actual developement team on IE, not just a hotfix team.
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
Last edited by evilboris; Oct 22, 2006 at 09:37 PM.
|
Slightly off-topic, but Firefox 2.0 went final yesterday.
FELIPE NO |
I hadn't bothered with IE7, since Firefox 2.0 came out and all. IE is no longer worth my time or HD space.
Most amazing jew boots |
So is this a Firefox discussion or IE discussion?
There's nowhere I can't reach. ![]() |
Thanks to Microsofts incompetence, any IE discussion automatically becomes a Firefox, Opera or Safari discussion. It's not like people who do the actual coding on the IE are narrow-minded, web-standards-defying morons (quite the contrary, from what I've heard), but the company just does not see the need to take the necessary steps for actual improvement. According to the Halloween documents a few people at Microsoft are indeed worried about open-source and Linux and since fear, uncertainty and doubt are working both ways by now, maybe they should rethink their stragedy.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Does text look a bit burry for you guys in I.E.7? I won't be using I.E. but these little things bother me =/
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? ![]()
Last edited by RPG Maker; Oct 25, 2006 at 01:15 AM.
|
Someone at the IEblog summarized it up the best:
I was speaking idiomatically. |
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
IE7 so far has no crashes for me. Forced to use it as some of the sites I go doesn't work well with Firefox
![]() How ya doing, buddy? |
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? |
Exactly how many IE-specific eccentricies are webdesigners still facing now anyway? Or in other words, is Microsoft still trying to defend its fading web browser monopoly by employing Embrace, Extend & Extinguish? Any comprehensive articles or first hand experiences yet?
Jam it back in, in the dark. |