![]() |
That damn sig checker.
It's annoying as all hell. Can we get it nixed, please?
Were signatures even that much of a problem before with going over the limits that you need this, or can we just go back to reporting obnoxious sigs like we used to? |
What's wrong with it? It does its job.
|
I've had to dupe it whenever I wanted two images in it, even if the combined image height is less than 300 pixels.
It's just aggrivating to have to get around and basically solves nothing. Anyone determined enough (IE. Myself and many others) can take 5 minutes to get around it, but it's a pain in the butt to do so. I guess I don't see the point to it, it's like a wall made of paper mache trying to stop an army of angry Mongolians. It'll only take them a moment to get around it because it's a piece of shit, so why is it even there? |
Quote:
It's so crappy we shouldn't even have it. Besides, the entire moderation team has access to editing signatures, so it's not like it'll take too much arm twisting to get done. |
I fully support this initiative.
Basically, it adds up the total height and width of your images and compares them to the limit as if it were one image which is unbelievably idiotic. So you can't even stack two small harmless pictures. This can't even be worked around by combining them if you want to, say, have each picture link to a different URL. If you saw Eleo's sig in the last GFF, you'd know what I mean since he did some creative stuff involving multiple images and links. |
I'll remove it if it means that people who break signature rules get their privileges revoked permanently.
|
I'd support that only if their signatures really suck. Uh oh! Can o' worms right there! ='D
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.