Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Political Palace (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Life without parole for children (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=39097)

Bradylama Oct 23, 2009 11:44 AM

Life without parole for children
 
YouTube Video

Quote:

Support Freedom Of Trafficking Victim Sara Kruzan (Criminal Justice - Change.org)

There are approximately 225 juveniles in California serving a life without parole sentence. California has the worst racial disparity rate in the nation for sentencing juveniles to life without parole. Black youth are given this sentence at 22 times the rate of white youth.

A number of California cases have recently been highlighted in the media due to the background of the juveniles who received the sentences, and the circumstances surrounding their crimes. One such case involves Sara Kruzan, now 28. She was raised in Riverside by her abusive, drug-addicted mother. Sara met her father only three times in her life because he was in prison.

Since the age of 9, Sara suffered from severe depression for which she was hospitalized several times. At the age of 11, she met a 31-year-old man named G.G. who molested her and began grooming her to become a prostitute. At age 13, she began working as a child prostitute for G.G. and was repeatedly molested by him. At age 16, Sara was convicted of killing him. She was sentenced to prison for the rest of her life despite her background and a finding by the California Youth Authority that she was amendable to treatment offered in the juvenile system.

“Life without parole means absolutely no opportunity for release,” said Senator Yee. (of California) “It also means minors are often left without access to programs and rehabilitative services while in prison. This sentence was created for the worst of criminals that have no possibility of reform and it is not a humane way to handle children. While the crimes they committed caused undeniable suffering, these youth offenders are not the worst of the worst.”

“As a society we’ve learned a lot since the time we started using life without parole for children,” said Elizabeth Calvin, a children’s rights advocate with Human Rights Watch. “We now know that this sentence provides no deterrent effect. While children who commit serious crimes should be held accountable, public safety can be protected without subjecting youth to the harshest prison sentence possible.”
Fuck this country

Davidd Oct 23, 2009 01:58 PM

Honestly what the fuck is going on in the world. What really angers me is when i show people things like this they just tell me racism doesn't exist anymore. It's just a few people around who wont let it go. How sheltered can you be to believe that.

Bradylama Oct 23, 2009 02:30 PM

21 to 1 you say? Well maybe if they dressed appropriately in court they wouldn't receive such harsh sentences.

loyalistreturns Oct 23, 2009 07:19 PM

Wow, punsihed mroe because the crime was well thought-out?

Society should reward minors for clear thinking and organised approaches.

Final Fantasy Phoneteen Oct 23, 2009 07:51 PM

C'mon, Dev. As much as the son of a bitch had it coming, you can't just kill someone.

Lord Styphon Oct 23, 2009 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loyalistreturns (Post 730579)
Wow, punsihed mroe because the crime was well thought-out?

Society should reward minors for clear thinking and organised approaches.

You're either being a troll or an idiot.

Either way, leave.

The unmovable stubborn Oct 23, 2009 08:31 PM

Or, you know, kidding.

He could be kidding.

Sarag Oct 23, 2009 08:39 PM

Okay, yeah. Her life was over before it began.

On the other hand think of her gravestone:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/222/4...ad99fdeec2.jpg

The unmovable stubborn Oct 23, 2009 08:52 PM

I'm comfortable taking posts at their face value without playing at long-term psychoanalysis, myself.

The unmovable stubborn Oct 23, 2009 09:12 PM

It's a long way of saying that anything that Styphon doesn't like is probably pretty good.

No. Hard Pass. Oct 23, 2009 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pangalin (Post 730589)
It's a long way of saying that anything that Styphon doesn't like is probably pretty good.

Not in this case.

The unmovable stubborn Oct 24, 2009 02:47 AM

This is not a principle from which cases may be exempted.

YO PITTSBURGH MIKE HERE Oct 24, 2009 02:53 AM

Of course not.

This is Gamingforce; You're either with us, or you're against us.

loyalistreturns Oct 24, 2009 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loyalistreturns
Wow, punsihed mroe because the crime was well thought-out?

Society should reward minors for clear thinking and organised approaches.
You're either being a troll or an idiot.

Either way, leave.
I don't see it that way. Frankly, someone who thought this crime out and then realised the moral problems with killing someone afterwards is far elss dangerous than a violent sociopath who simply lashes out at random.

I would also argue that this indicative of a larger problem in the US, that of over-using prison sentences in an effort to curb crime - one that has failed, but i s politically convienient.

Tails Oct 24, 2009 07:21 AM

Quote boxes don't work like that.

For a second I thought you were seriously arguing with yourself (still laughing). Next time just quote the post you're replying to.

loyalistreturns Oct 24, 2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

You don't remember Loyalist do you?
Life is ironic above all else. Either it's sick, depressing or downright amusing. Probably some combination of the above.

It is good to see that Mr. Styphon is as vigilant as ever.

AtomicDuck Oct 26, 2009 08:30 PM

I don't have any issue with locking someone up for life without parole regardless of their age if the crime is bad enough. However, to punish someone with murder when it was clearly self defense is fucked up beyond description.

Randi Nov 6, 2009 11:58 PM

The title for this thead is entirely misleading and dramatic.

I'm not saying that the judge did right in this particular case, but if the circumstances were different, I definitely wouldn't say that a 16-year-old qualifies as a child. By that time, you're entirely aware of the consequences that come with committing heinous crimes.

Lauro Nov 7, 2009 10:01 AM

Regarding the original post.., I believe if those points regarding her past were brought up in the case then she most likely wouldn't have received such a harsh punishment. I can't imagine any jury that would convict a minor of what, put in that light, seems like self-defense.

This leads me to believe that those facts were most likely fabricated by the defense (or some advocate group with their own political agenda) afterwards in what appears to be some attempt to bring light to that particular case and further some cause.

As for the statistics that people usually read about with Hispanics and African Americans usually receiving more (or harsher) convictions. Though prejudice/racism on the part of police officers and other legal officials may play a small role, I believe the numbers are more due to the fact that there are far more members of those ethnic groups living in poverty or lower-income situations, which usually equals higher crime rates.

I really doubt ethnicity/racism played any part in this case though, and presented with only these limited (seemingly biased) facts I can't really form an opinion on this particular case myself. Perhaps she did deserve the sentence she received or perhaps not. The fact that she was a minor at the time though means this court ruling could probably be appealed successfully for a reduced sentence.

Bradylama Nov 10, 2009 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randi (Post 732131)
The title for this thead is entirely misleading and dramatic.

I'm not saying that the judge did right in this particular case, but if the circumstances were different, I definitely wouldn't say that a 16-year-old qualifies as a child. By that time, you're entirely aware of the consequences that come with committing heinous crimes.

This is completely false and backed up by decades of adolescent psychology. Adolescents do not have the brain development which renders them capable of higher moral reasoning, not that they do not have a concept of right or wrong but that they're not sufficiently prepared to appreciate the consequences of their actions. This scientific evidence was even cited by SCOTUS in their decision which struck down the Juvenile Death Penalty a few years ago.

SCOTUS is reviewing two cases from Florida regarding young men sentenced to JVLWOP for non-violent offenses. Initial questioning in court makes it look like it will be a 5-4 decision in January either in favor of or against human dignity.

Additional Spam:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lauro (Post 732162)
I don't know anything about the actual court proceedings but here's my dumbass opinion, durr durr durrrrrr

Incompetence of advocacy is a common theme when it comes to kids sentenced to JVLWOP.

This Frontline from 2007 features at least two kids whose court-appointed attorneys demonstrated massive incompetence.

Additional Spam:
Those 21 to 1 odds are statistically significant indicators that race played a role in her sentencing, by the way.

Magi Nov 10, 2009 02:02 PM

Quote:

I believe the numbers are more due to the fact that there are far more members of those ethnic groups living in poverty or lower-income situations, which usually equals higher crime rates.
Quote:

Those 21 to 1 odds are statistically significant indicators that race played a role in her sentencing, by the way.
I think he is confusing statistical comparison of the conviction rate per capita (As this type of comparison usually should have been) with the general likelihood that a individual may-be caught into that kind of situation.

Bradylama Nov 10, 2009 06:53 PM

It's amazing how shocked old cracker judges are when adolescents don't respect a court of law.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.