What would you consider more important
 

clean cut and to the point...

A personality that is fun and interesting when one on one

or...

A personality that is fun and interesting when in a group

Let's also say that you can only have one or the other. you can be great in groups but bad at one on one, or great at one on one and quiet in groups.

Being the kind of person in this situation:
"A personality that is fun and interesting when one on one"

I'm inclined to say that I would rather be the kind of person that is fun in groups. I can relate to all my friends very well if it's just me and them, or at least to some degree if we're not that close. However, in group settings, and sometimes even when it's my set of best friends, I'm not very adept at being fun and lively to the full extent I could be with certain friends one on one. I just find it much easier to relate with people one on one.

Being fun in groups would be highly advantageous since you'd be able to appeal to a wide variety of people, much like certain friends of mine are able to do. Even if they aren't as exciting individually, it wouldn't matter when they're having fun and being amiable with many people.

As much as I don't believe it's possible for someone to only get along with people in groups or one on one company, if I could only deal with one way, it'd have to be one on one. All relationship possibilities aside, the main reason for that is that even when in a group situation, you might still just talk to one person at a time. So those traits are more easily going to carry over into a group situation, whereas not all traits particular to someone good in a group, can carry over well into a one on one situation.

Now I think what I just said, actually makes half a lick of sense. Basically I'd rather be closer to one person, than entertainment for many. If I had to choose of course.

This is kind of a stupid topic.

"Would you rather have only a left hand or a right?"

Couldn't agree more.

ADDITIONAL SPAM: It's also like 'Would you rather save your father only from being killed or your mother only? '

I'm sure if someone asked which hand you would prefer to be cut off, one would be more important to you than the other. Same with your mother or father being killed, I'm sure most people are closer to one parent than the other and would have different levels of importance for each parent. Of course we want both our hands, and both our parents, and the ability to be 1-on-1 and fun in groups, but the question isn't "would you rather have a good personality 1-on-1 or in groups", it's "what you feel is more important".

And to me it's not a stupid topic so get out my face!

I'm moreso the latter choice already. I have lots of fun in groups, but kind of dull one-on-one.

And that's not very useful. You'll most often need to convince and persuade people when it's just the two of you, rather than group appeal. Unless you're in a public speech position, or a lawyer or someshit.

that's exactly how I feel, I've always been great in groups but feel like I lack something in one on one....I want to know how to fix that and be more interesting in one on one. I guess I'm too socially dependant or something.

You know, this is an interesting topic. I've been thinking about this, lately... I prefer having a one-on-one conversation with somebody; my personality has more room to shine, and I generally like to have insightful and interesting conversations with people one-on-one. When I'm with a group, I find it harder to have fun and talk because everyone is sort of trying to outdo each other in terms of entertainment, at least that's how I see it. Especially when drinking is involved. When it comes to alcohol... even if I've drank quite a few beers, I'm relaxed and quiet.

Anyway, alcohol aside, in a group everyone seems to be talking at once, and it's harder to socialize that way, in my opinion. So yeah, my personality prefers one-on-one.

Hypothetical questions like that are not useful, interesting, or revealing. They present an artificial situation that has no real bearing on reality, and 99% of the time people's answers are totally trite and forgettable anyway.

Please don't make any more topics like this, or if you do, do it in The Quiet Place or something.

You have the right to your opinion, but mine differs, I'm sorry. I don't think questions like that are boring in any way, or unrevealing. You learn more about yourself when asking and answering them. The questions at hand range from what you feel is more important in a personality to which hand is most useful to you(whether it be jerking off or writing with a pencil). Even if they aren't important or terribly useful, which I totally agree with you on, they are still something semi-interesting (based on opinion) to talk about. I'm sorry if you found it boring and unnecessary, but 5 people (including myself) didn't, and because of that, I saw other points of view on the subject. I especially liked Qube's response.