Signature Limit Upped
 

I know you guys have been asking for this awhile now. I have finally edited the signature rules on the signature editing page to match that listed on chocosig hosting. Yes, that means your sig can be up to 75 kb.

Just try to keep it as low as you can, alright? =)

I actually haven't been asking for this, but I like it all the same. It's annoying when I want to add ONE line of text, but can't 'cause it's over the limit :D

Thanks,

can I get 100kb up in this place

If by "kb" you mean "kickbans", yes

/r/ing 100kb on Kirche-chan in #gfchat, thanks.

I blow the celebratory kazoo to signal the beginning of a new era.

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g1...rama/kazoo.gif

Thanks guys

This is actually just a ploy to get Sass to stop annoying you guys with sig reports so much, right?

Seriously though? Thanks a lot. <3333 PNG time like a motherfucking what.

::three hundred 87kb signature pics appear::

I guess this is a fine thing for the people who absolutely MUST get to use tri-linear vectorized sharfon-theloisen filtering in their .pngs.

Keep in mind the limit is 75kb now and Miles is asking nicely to not to go over it (or to try to make them 70kb+ in the first place)

It's like a totally new language.

It'll take more than Babelfish to decifer that though.

Reported post in : Signature Limit Upped
The following post has been reported ;

Thread : Signature Limit Upped

Original Post by Shin :


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kolba
It's like a totally new language.
It'll take more than Babelfish to decifer that though.

Reason Given : Sig 75.1 KB

yay thx for this now it will be easier for me to ajust the blue background for the "fake-transparency" XD

And just because the limit is changed you shouldn't go and re-edit your current sig to be bigger. The option is there and matches the chocosig setup that bobo never fixed (this raise would probably never happen if he fixed it to 50kb), but only use it if you really really need to so we can save a little bit on bandwidth.

Progress! One Sass sig report at a time. =)

That, or just get off your own lazy ass and buy webhosting so you can use your own bandwidth.

That's what every smart person does.

Now I can fit two of my favorite cool dragon dragon rock the dragon Dragonball Z GIF's from Geocities DBZ HQ Ultra GokuCarrotFace Zone SSJ800 in my sig. :dopey_love:

This is awesome. I'll kill the intarweb with mad FX on sigs.

Naw, the reason they have it at this filesize is not for hosting reasons. Both Imageshack and Imagesocket go up to a megabyte so there's free hosting right there. The reason it's like this is that they appeal to the lowest common denomonater which is people on 56k who actually give a fuck (and they usually don't, they're 56k) and those who don't enjoy loading images period for whatever reason.

The only reason it got raised at all was because of bobo's mistake to up it to 75kb and continuous sig reports from you-know-who.


Personally, I think we should just give people options on how high they want the total sig filesize to be and have it show a small picture in someone's sig saying it's been blocked by this option if it goes over the setting and call it a day. Then people can do whatever they want and noone can complain.

Sass will complain.

@ Acer: I heard Imageshack don't allow GFF to hotlink sigs anymore :confused:

Oh well fuck them. Use Imagesocket then. At least it isn't riddled with ads. And they let you host over a megabyte unlike Imageshack.

well if you look at my sig thread (click on my sig) there's about half of the sig there host on imageshack and I can still see them....(or am I the only one to see them? XD)

but yeah use imagesocket it's seem it's way better ^^

I found another image hosting site: http://tinypic.com/

Not sure if it's any good though..

The sig size limit is there so that I (and of course many others, but that's irrelevant lol) don't have to sit here waiting for twenty 100kb signature pictures to load, we've gone through this so many times.

Not everyone wants to see the funny animated signature picture you put up or the smooth filtering, some people just want to read posts.

I have broadband like many others, but that doesn't mean everything loads up instantly. I (along with many others) do care about aesthetics enough to browse with signatures on, though, so a light set is not the solution.