Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   NASA To Bomb The Moon. (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=38985)

Kimchi Oct 8, 2009 08:19 PM

NASA To Bomb The Moon.
 
NASA To Bomb The Moon (PHOTOS)

NASA + Moon= let's bomb it.

Ever wondered what will happen once a missile hits the moon?
Well, we will have to wait and see the results because with the name of science, NASA is going to be launching a missile to the moon.

About damn time we blow up that yellow thing that glows when it gets dark.

Gechmir Oct 8, 2009 08:54 PM

Funny story, but a few decades back, a group of geophysicists were pretty gung-ho about setting off a nuke on the surface of the moon for some bitchin' seismic readings :3: Oh, science. You've grown dull and boring with age.

Worm Oct 8, 2009 09:26 PM

America, science is awesome! Please show your support by getting your articles straight. :mad: This is how silly chain emails get started.

A bomb is not a missile is not a rocket is not... well... I guess the Centaur is still technically a rocket. My understanding is that it ain't got no fuel left, so this is basically going to be a gravity-accelerated kinetic energy weapon, which is way cooler to me. I haven't been keeping up on my science news, so it was pretty neat to hear about this. Watchin' dat countdown clock.

I don't suppose there are any amateur astronomers on this board who have a telescope big enough to see the impact?

No. Hard Pass. Oct 8, 2009 09:56 PM

The whole point of this is to check for subterranean water. I think that's a pretty neat reason to shoot a rocket at the moon. Plus, it's good to show the arabs they aren't our only target these days.

hikarub Oct 8, 2009 11:19 PM

Heard about this I think yesterday? It seems like an interesting and cool way to see if there are still pockets of water or ice that everyone thinks is still there. Supposedly the moon's effect on the Earth's tides and whatnot won't be affected by the impact? I see videos of people protesting against the experiment, predicting killer tsunamis and tidal waves that will destroy New York, Tokyo, and other coastal cities if it is allowed to go ahead.... :rolleyes:

Looking forward to seeing what NASA finds up there.

Jurassic Park Chocolate Raptor Oct 9, 2009 01:25 AM

http://www.infoniac.com/uimg/moon_crash.jpg

FatsDomino Oct 9, 2009 05:36 AM

http://www.thegond.com/rp/ahafter10thousandyears.jpg

Malmer Oct 9, 2009 06:55 AM

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/4700/lol1ni.jpg

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/6873/lol2b.jpg

Tails Oct 9, 2009 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denicalis (Post 728948)
The whole point of this is to check for subterranean water. I think that's a pretty neat reason to shoot a rocket at the moon. Plus, it's good to show the arabs they aren't our only target these days.

The only next logical step is to somehow shoot the moon at the Arabs.

Get on it, NASA.

Malmer Oct 9, 2009 07:15 AM

Fuck yeah. It can only fail if the Arabs have Link.

Gechmir Oct 9, 2009 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tails (Post 728989)
The only next logical step is to somehow shoot the moon at the Arabs.

Get on it, NASA.

NASA seems to end up with a mess on their hands when the heat and pressure is on them. Putting parachutes in backwards, mixing up feet and metrics, etc.

They'll just get the news as "MOON THE ARABS". Don't expect to see the pictures in newspapers :(

YouTube Video
Also, WHAT A JERK :mad:

UPDATE: The moon is still there. I think we've lost, guys :(

Animechanic Oct 9, 2009 09:38 AM

Well I guess they're busy analyzing data at the moment. The video update this morning was basically "look at these photos! Look at these videos!" But they're all just pictures of the crater with no visual indication of the impact, very much like the chase vehicle footage they showed live.

Spectrometers picked up stuff though so science will get done. At the very least it means they didn't miss.

Edit: One odd thing though is that they were expecting a plume of debris to be kicked up, and well... that apparently didn't happen.

And to keep from derailing the thread with science:
YouTube Video

Sousuke Oct 9, 2009 02:26 PM

Is it just me, or are the people over at NASA getting crazier and crazier?

"...Genlemen... How do we kill the MOON?"

Magi Oct 9, 2009 05:05 PM

This wasn't even unusual right before we actually landed on the moon. Didn't they smash a bunch of satellite into the moon before the first moon landing just so we can see what the surface is actually like?

No. Hard Pass. Oct 9, 2009 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sousuke (Post 729029)
Is it just me, or are the people over at NASA getting crazier and crazier?

"...Genlemen... How do we kill the MOON?"

http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/...face-moon.jpeg

"...Brilliant. Gentlemen, opinions?"

http://www.seanwang.com/comics_tick_..._chairface.gif

Kimchi Oct 9, 2009 10:17 PM

Let it crash on Earth.

http://gambit.mit.edu/updates/Moon.bmp

Bernard Black Oct 10, 2009 12:01 PM

NASA are unfeeling bastards :(

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...langers460.jpg

:(:(

Krelian Oct 10, 2009 01:35 PM

http://imgur.com/XSccY.png

YO PITTSBURGH MIKE HERE Oct 10, 2009 01:41 PM

Did I neglect to mention I maintain most of NASA's Twitter feeds, including @LCROSS_NASA?

You'd think I would remember to bring something like that up.

Jessykins Oct 10, 2009 04:19 PM

This relationship is over, Mike.

Poopsie Oct 11, 2009 01:59 AM

Quote:

The whole point of this is to check for subterranean water. I think that's a pretty neat reason to shoot a rocket at the moon. Plus, it's good to show the arabs they aren't our only target these days.
I thought that was the main idea concerning Mars.

Animechanic Oct 11, 2009 12:54 PM

Same idea for both. Need water for a base on the moon or Mars. Well, maybe not need, but it becomes a lot more possible.

Besides the obvious of needing water to stay alive, it can also be split to produce oxygen and hydrogen. One of which is also needed to stay alive, and both of which are needed to launch a rocket.

The Wise Vivi Oct 18, 2009 09:35 AM

Pretty soon, the moon will become habitable just like in the Star Trek Universe! :D It would be pretty cool though to find out there is water there and that the possibility of it becoming habitable. However, that could change a lot of the things we already experience about the moon. What would happen if an atmosphere was created. Its too bad that science sometimes creates more questions than answers.

greatPumpkin Oct 22, 2009 08:06 PM

they really bombing or are they sending spores out there as well if they are looking for water?


me thinks these are just the first step. i actually can't wait for the helium-3 wars on the moon.

Animechanic Oct 22, 2009 08:33 PM

Depends on your definition of bomb, I guess. They sent a rocket straight into the lunar surface at twice the speed of sound. It did not have an explosive payload, but could be classified as a kinetic weapon I suppose.

Timberwolf8889 Nov 14, 2009 09:05 AM

They found water on the moon

Quote:

“Indeed yes, we found water,” Anthony Colaprete, the principal investigator for NASA’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, said in a news conference. “And we didn’t find just a little bit. We found a significant amount.”

The confirmation of scientists’ suspicions is welcome news to explorers who might set up home on the lunar surface and to scientists who hope that the water, in the form of ice accumulated over billions of years, holds a record of the solar system’s history.

The satellite, known as Lcross (pronounced L-cross), crashed into a crater near the Moon’s south pole a month ago. The 5,600-miles-per-hour impact carved out a hole 60 to 100 feet wide and kicked up at least 26 gallons of water.
Not sure if this is old news for people, but I just heard about it it this morning. Mission success.

Paco Nov 14, 2009 10:51 AM

I read it this morning on Current too. In before water bottling companies make bids to buy rights to MoonWater™.

FatsDomino Nov 14, 2009 10:55 AM

http://www.thegond.com/rp/moontear.jpg

Misogynyst Gynecologist Nov 14, 2009 11:50 AM

I'm not sure why everyone is surprised. Mars has water on it, wouldn't our closest celestial neighbor as well? It just makes sense.

Krelian Nov 14, 2009 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeHah (Post 732918)
I'm not sure why everyone is surprised. Mars has water on it, wouldn't our closest celestial neighbor as well? It just makes sense.

Probably because scientific progress doesn't work on the basis of things "just making sense". Quite the opposite in most cases.

Timberwolf8889 Nov 14, 2009 01:43 PM

I would imagine it also depends on which theory of the moon's formation you buy into as well, as well as theories as to what brought that significant amount of water to earth in the first place.

Misogynyst Gynecologist Nov 14, 2009 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krelian (Post 732920)
Probably because scientific progress doesn't work on the basis of things "just making sense".

I'm questioning the veracity of the surprise, not the scientific method, you bubble-headed booby!

RacinReaver Nov 16, 2009 10:22 AM

I think the surprise might be in them saying a "significant amount."


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.