Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Media Centre (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Sunshine (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36069)

Matt Jan 20, 2007 03:24 PM

SUNSHINE (2007)
 

Sunshine is a new film from Danny Boyle (Trainspotting, 28 Days Later).

Quote:

The Sun is dying, and mankind is dying with it. Our last hope: a spaceship and a crew of eight men and women. They carry a device which will breathe new life into the star. But deep into their voyage, out of radio contact with Earth, their mission is starting to unravel. Soon the crew are fighting not only for their lives, but their sanity.
Cast:
Rose Byrne
Cliff Curtis
Chris Evans
Troy Garity
Cillian Murphy
Hiroyuki Sanada
Mark Strong
Benedict Wong
Michelle Yeoh

Official Film Website


Trailer 1

4 minute extended trailer

1 minute clip

It looks amazing, and I'm excited to see Cillian Murphy in a non-creepy role.

knkwzrd Jan 20, 2007 03:47 PM

Thanks for the trailer, I hadn't even heard about it. Looks pretty good.

Cellius Jan 20, 2007 04:57 PM

Why did they have to use that freakin' music? Other than that it looks pretty thrilling.

Domino Jan 20, 2007 05:11 PM

It has an interesting premise, and it looks pretty good. Seems as if they may have a good film on their hands.

It did kind of remind me of Solaris (just had a feel about it), and I hated that film, so I will be interested to see what they can do with it.

The Wise Vivi Jan 20, 2007 06:01 PM

Yeah, Solaris sucked soooooo bad. Although 28 Days Later was pretty intense, it left me dry at the end. I hope this movie doesn't do the same type of thing. I enjoy movies that have a better explanation on how things end... I have to agree.... why did they use that music?

happyskrillz Jan 20, 2007 06:40 PM

Well, that depends on which Solaris you guys are talking about. The American 2002 version or the Russian 1972 version which is seen as a classic. The americanized version was indeed terrible. Anyways, this Sunshine movie looks amazing, nothing less than I would expect from Boyle. I just find it hard to believe that such said device would exist even in the future. Putting that aside, I will be sure to enjoy this movie when it comes out as much as possible.

JazzFlight Jan 20, 2007 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cellius (Post 369169)
Why did they have to use that freakin' music? Other than that it looks pretty thrilling.

Seriously, once it started, I was thinking:

"Geez, their visuals are great enough that they didn't need to rely on the modified Requiem for a Dream theme. That's like putting Duel of the Fates in every Star Wars fan film."

Like I said, this movie looks to have some incredible visuals. The story/drama could be shit, though. We'll just have to see.

happyskrillz Jan 20, 2007 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JazzFlight (Post 369449)
"Geez, their visuals are great enough that they didn't need to rely on the modified Requiem for a Dream theme. That's like putting Duel of the Fates in every Star Wars fan film."

I could never take that theme seriously after I saw the Willy Wonka Requiem for a Dream over at YTMND...

Matt Jul 5, 2007 11:53 PM

I added the 4 minute extended trailer to the OP. It looks better and better everytime I watch it. I just wish it didn't have so many spoilers. Watch at your own risk.

Oh also, they've nailed down the US release date to July 20th.

LaMenina Jul 6, 2007 12:36 AM

Oooh...Cillian Murphy is in this? I haven't seen him in anything since Red Eye...I usually don't go for this type of sci fi suspense thing, but this sounds interesting...I might check it out.

Dizzy Jul 6, 2007 12:45 AM

The trailer looks sooo sweet. Can't wait to see the movie. But, they've got a HAL 9000 on the ship? Oh man, they're all doomed.

Edit: Wait, Why the movie has already 11.000 votes on IMDB? Where has it been realeased?

Unregistered Jul 6, 2007 03:43 AM

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448134/releaseinfo

It wasn't too bad. Go see it. Oh, and for those of you complaining about the trailer's music, don't worry, the music isn't used in the movie. I think...

Skexis Jul 6, 2007 03:54 AM

This reminds me so much of a TV movie I saw a long time ago on Fox called "Lifepod." It was basically a ripoff of Hitchcock's Lifeboat, but I loved it.

There's no murderer hiding among the crew in this one, but it does have some of the same basic tenets.

Frankly I think the last gasp at survival scenario needs a good rest. 9 years later and we're all still trying to wash the taste of Apocalypse out of our mouths.

chaofan Jul 6, 2007 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dizzy (Post 466245)
The trailer looks sooo sweet. Can't wait to see the movie. But, they've got a HAL 9000 on the ship? Oh man, they're all doomed.

Edit: Wait, Why the movie has already 11.000 votes on IMDB? Where has it been realeased?

It's been out here in Australia about 2 months ago. I think it also came out in Britain earlier on too.

I thought Sunshine was very well directed and was very tense. Danny Boyle's take on sci-fi is like what 28 Days Later is to zombie movies: it runs with the conventions of the genre, but adds a human layer to it. The performances are great as well, and the CG in some scenes are marvelous.

Rock Jul 6, 2007 06:54 AM

The movie has been out in Europe since April. Sunshine is one of the most enthralling Sci-Fi movies I've seen in recent years and its visuals are simply stunning. The ending felt a little stretched and out of place, though.

Matt Jul 6, 2007 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chaofan (Post 466370)
I thought Sunshine was very well directed and was very tense. Danny Boyle's take on sci-fi is like what 28 Days Later is to zombie movies: it runs with the conventions of the genre, but adds a human layer to it. The performances are great as well, and the CG in some scenes are marvelous.

Sounds awesome.
The extended trailer really got me pumped for the movie. It looks like they added the human condition from Alien (things keep going wrong but we have to hold on) and threw it into a mission to save the solar system.

speculative Jul 16, 2007 12:31 AM

I might go check this out. There are too few quality sci-fi films made these days. (At least the fantasy genre is getting more fleshed-out with LotR, Harry Potter, Narnia, etc.) I honestly have not heard about this film before viewing this thread, however - how do they expect the film to do well without advertising?

Megalith Jul 21, 2007 02:57 PM

Is anyone else having trouble finding a theater that is playing this.

Apparently, I would have to drive to NY just to see this.

Matt Jul 21, 2007 03:54 PM

Yeah, apparently it's only opening in "Selected Cities" now.

It isn't even showing in Detroit. :(

Arkhangelsk Jul 21, 2007 04:58 PM

I just now started seeing advertisements on TV for this.
Is it sad that the main reason I want to see it is for Cillian Murphy? :(
I've really enjoyed the films he's been in, and he's quite attractive to boot.

DragoonKain Jul 22, 2007 08:41 PM

The plot may be the dumbest I've ever heard of in movie history, but the movie actually looks pretty good. Might check it out.

XtremeDJW Jul 23, 2007 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DragoonKain (Post 476825)
The plot may be the dumbest I've ever heard of in movie history,

That's what I thought originally, but when you actually see the movie it's quite believable.

Skexis Aug 2, 2007 04:13 AM

I really enjoyed this movie in the theater. We were lucky enough to get it at our "art house" theater that carries a lot of foreign and indie films, so my dad and I caught it the other day.

It's intense. I was a little dubious going into it just how much they could add onto an apocalypse premise, but it turned out to be much more of a pure sci-fi film than I thought it would be. It's marked by, if not real science, then an attempt to seem real. Nothing is laid out nice and neat for these astronauts. They can't engage the warp drive and make everything better. And, being human, sometimes they make mistakes.

I think what really sold me on the film was the use of sound and visuals. It was a real experience, and if you get the chance, the theater is definitely the place to see it. If I had to complain about anything, I think it would be the latter half of the film.

Spoiler:
there is a little bit too much of the slasher film creeping in there, and I don't think the first captain is necessary to the plot. It really had enough going on as it was. Plus ghost ships are spookier than surgical tool-wielding madmen any day.


It wasn't until later that I realized how much had been borrowed from Event Horizon, but the aim of both films is a little different. Still, very enjoyable and visceral film. I recommend it to sci-fi buffs or anyone looking for a Lifeboat-esque thrill ride.

Hantei Aug 2, 2007 04:39 AM

I saw this on Monday and enjoyed it as well. I was so shocked to see some big name stars in the movie (eg. Hiroyuki Sanada, Michelle Yeoh), heh, and was even more surprised that it was only screening in 2 theatres in my city. Didn't even realize it was an independant film (or film festival type of movie) till I saw the previews.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skexis (Post 482926)
Spoiler:
there is a little bit too much of the slasher film creeping in there, and I don't think the first captain is necessary to the plot. It really had enough going on as it was. Plus ghost ships are spookier than surgical tool-wielding madmen any day.

Haha, yea once it got to that it started to bug me a little.
Spoiler:
I was half-expecting some like The Core, then the first captain really turned the movie into a bit of slasher. Actually once they stepped into Icarus I and started to flash the photos of the previous crew, that's when I started getting creeped out a bit and was kinda expecting some horror stuff to start (which I was not expecting at all).

Matt Jan 10, 2008 10:46 PM

So.
The DVD just released in America and I was finally able to see this film.

This amazing film.

It sucked me in and didn't let go until the very end. I'd post detailed impressions but I feel that this user at IMDB has the film nailed down:
IMDB user's impressions of Sunshine:
Sunshine cost £20 million. Jerry Bruckheimer and his Hollywood cohorts must be shaking their head in disbelief. Danny Boyle and Alex Garland, British born and bred, have outdone America's effects laden finest, and at a mere fraction of the price. Armageddon ($140 million) and Pirates of The Caribbean 2 ($225 million) have nothing, nothing on the majestic visuals that Sunshine offers. From the jaw dropping opening sequence to the fantastically realised final moments, Boyle's latest is a mighty treat for the eyes.

But of course, effects do not make a film. You need only consider the two aforementioned Bruckheimer blowouts for proof. But happily, behind the blinding visuals, Sunshine has a violently beating heart. One that offers absolutely no let up, that gains speed and then gains a little more, before finally threatening cardiac arrest. You can't help but live and breath every moment of the crew's breathless existence.

The year is 2057 and a select group of astronauts are given that most trifling of tasks. The sun is dying. Drop a bomb in it. Save all of mankind. And to top it all, on a ship rather ominously named 'Icarus II'. Add inevitable inter crewmember tension and you have a rather heated situation. The sweaty crew are played wonderfully by a decidedly un-starry, but talented cast. Cilian Murphy, taking the lead role as the ship's resident physicist Cappa, the only member who has the wherewithal to actually drop the bomb, is coolly enigmatic as ever, the blue orbs of his eyes forming a nice counterpoint to the never far rather redder orb of the sun. You can't help but feel he isn't particularly challenged as an actor, but nevertheless he provides a suitably ambivalent, androgynous and faintly unsettling core to the proceedings.

Perhaps more impressive is Chris Evans. Recently seen in a similarly hot headed role in the undercooked comic book adaptation 'Fantastic Four', he consistently snatches scenes from Murphy as engineer Mace, about as volatile and fiery as Cappa is composed and cool. Without Evan's energetic performance, the film would sink into an anti-libidinal quag. Mace's emotive instability injects pace when it's needed and brings some welcome variety to the otherwise glum faces. Evans is surely on the brink of big things. A small quibble would be that there are perhaps a few too many characters; meaning that a fair share of the cast never really gets a chance for development, which is irritating, as one gets the feeling that there's a lot of wasted potential.

Another chink in Sunshine's spacesuit, is in many places, Alex Garland's screenplay. Whilst he has a remarkable talent for creating intense psychological tension, of which there is plenty in Sunshine, his philosophizing is much less satisfactory. This is not to say he doesn't play with some fascinating ideas. With the crew circling so close to the Sun, to the giver of life, Garland begins ask the biggest of questions. Is there something, something inestimably greater than ourselves, something that could create such a magnificent star, or are we, like the sun, simply dust? It's a great idea, but for the larger part of the film, it seems oddly shoehorned into what is at base a sci-fi pot-boiler. In fact these ideas are better expressed in Boyle's imagery. Time and time again we see members of the crew staring aghast at the immensity of the burning ball of gas and dust in front of them. The relationship between giver and taker is better explored here than in any line of Garland's.


Sunshine is Danny Boyle's best film, hands down. Yeah sure, I might be a little more biased towards science fiction than, say, heroin-addled youths, but wow is Sunshine one hell of a movie.

Skexis, you're right about the sounds and visuals. I was lucky enough to watch the film on an HDTV with a premium surround sound system and it floored me. But I kept thinking that I've heard the music somewhere before...eh oh well. It was awesome either way.

K_ Takahashi Jan 11, 2008 01:44 AM

Since this go zero media attention I had no clue about this film and thought it was a direct-to-video deal.

Megalith Jan 11, 2008 02:04 AM

I will be picking this up tomorrow and watching it in DTS-HD.

Matt Jan 11, 2008 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K_ Takahashi (Post 565685)
Since this go zero media attention I had no clue about this film and thought it was a direct-to-video deal.

Which is sad, too.
I think it just wasn't distributed well in America because there were too many American "blockbusters" in the theaters already.
The studio releasing it in the US probably figured it wasn't going to make much many because it was sci-fi or something stupid like that.

It's like what they did with Pan's Labyrinth and Children of Men, two fantastic films that more people should have been made aware of and had the opportunity to see in the theater. But because they weren't made in the US then they were just pushed aside and placed in limited release until they came out on DVD.

Wall Feces Jan 11, 2008 12:35 PM

I managed to see this in theaters and absolutely LOVED it. I'm hoping to pick it up on DVD once I find some funds to scrape together.

russ Jan 11, 2008 07:29 PM

Yeah, I bought it on blu-ray Tuesday and thought that it was incredible. The only real negative about the film was
Spoiler:
that once they find the signal from the first Icarus ship, and find that it is still intact, it was fairly predictable that one of the crew members from that ship would still be alive and at least somewhat insane.

But that is kind of a minor complaint considering how well done the rest of the movie is.

I poked it and it made a sad sound Feb 15, 2008 10:55 AM

Maybe I am the only person who didn't enjoy this movie.

I think it started out really well. I was interested, I was intrigued, I cared. But as soon as they boarded the first Icarus ship, I got flashbacks from Alien for some reason. And then a raving lunatic boarded THEIR ship, and low and behold, we was a madman.

It was predictable. It had potential I guess, but I really didn't enjoy it AT ALL.

I guess I am too used to space films of this nature having a really grandiose, underlying theme. I think I was expecting that from Sunshine, but I didn't find anything too profound in it. =/

Room Feb 15, 2008 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassafrass (Post 569438)
Maybe I am the only person who didn't enjoy this movie.

I think it started out really well. I was interested, I was intrigued, I cared. But as soon as they boarded the first Icarus ship, I got flashbacks from Alien for some reason. And then a raving lunatic boarded THEIR ship, and low and behold, we was a madman.

It was predictable. It had potential I guess, but I really didn't enjoy it AT ALL.

I guess I am too used to space films of this nature having a really grandiose, underlying theme. I think I was expecting that from Sunshine, but I didn't find anything too profound in it. =/

No, I too loathed this movie. It'd be a compliment to call Danny Boyle the witless Kubrick. "Pretentious" is often bestowed upon pics like The Assassination of Jesse James but I haven't seen anything as philosophically blank and heavy-handed since Crash (ok fine, In The Valley of Elah). That Boyle strives for greatness makes it all the more embarrassing.

speculative Feb 16, 2008 01:35 PM

I enjoyed 28 Days Later but recently saw 28 Weeks Later and thought it was some of the most mindless trash I've ever witnessed. So, no wonder that I really didn't see the point of Sunshine. I spent a lot of the movie just trying to see the lead character as non-creepy, since I've only seen the actor play villians. It was jarring to me to try to emphathize with him.

I think there was a lot of so-called "art" for art's-sake in this film, that was in the end pointless. For example, the spiritual side of the light. What was the point, if they didn't in the end take that idea anywhere? I did not fell that theme was tied back into the characters, or into the ending of the film.

In the end, what could have been a highly philosophical sci-fi film derailed into a completely standard "madman tries to murder the whole crew" plot. Heck, that plot's been around since there's been sailing ships on the high seas let alone science fiction. :rolleyes:

knkwzrd Feb 16, 2008 01:44 PM

I think the reason that there is such a split opinion over this film is that though all of its metaphors fall completely flat, it's an excellent film from a technical standpoint. I enjoyed it, but I didn't think it was anything special.

Mithrandir Feb 25, 2008 08:04 PM

One positive point of the movie was the whole technologic side of it and the spiritual side of the sun. The sun represents God in some way and the humanity sets out in space to save God.

The only thing I didn't think was necessary was the whole other plot including the Icarus I. Although this was told to balance the fact that a human wants to play God.

I still think it,s worth renting.

Kaiten Jan 20, 2009 12:08 AM

Sunshine
 
Gist of it: it's 2057, sun's going dark and the crew of the Icarus II has to deliver a payload of all of Earth's remaining nuclear-capable material into the core of the sun to re-ignite it. Everything else is major spoilers, so I won't tell you even if they are obvious, the twists are one of the best parts of the movie.


Wow this movie has left me speechless. I was told ahead of time that the science in this movie is iffy if not outright bogus, so I focused exclusively on the cast side of things.

The acting blew my mind, unlike 28 Days/Weeks later it was humans not fighting for their own survival, but that of all humanity. Seeing how they act almost all altruistically was a refreshing change and seeing Chris Evans (Mace) in this movie makes up for Fantastic Four (maybe). The idea of giving all the cast a near equal emphasis was brilliant and helped make it feel more human, a team effort.

It's like an inverse of Alien, you know what's going to happen in the end, but you have an opposite feeling about it.

chaofan Jan 20, 2009 12:26 AM

Must've missed this: http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/me...ne-2007-a.html

However, seeing as how it's a severely under-watched movie, I'm not complaining. Indeed, the movie was a spectacle if not for the well-rounded cast and the exhilarating sequences were a sight to behold.

Although definitely not the best sci-fi movie, it's one of the top for me. Cillian Murphy was great, Chris Evans was surprisingly decent, as was Rose Byrne and the rest of the cast. As for:

Spoiler:
Hiroyuki Sanada's character, he died too early IMO :gonk:


Great movie, and one that needs to be watched by more people.

Paco Jan 20, 2009 12:27 AM

Oh that's right! Chris Evans! Man, that guy did a powerhouse performance in Fantastic 4. Oscar material, that guy.

Kaiten Jan 20, 2009 12:42 AM

What?
There's already a thread?

...
:shock:

Wait one second! I did a search for "sunshine" (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/se...archid=1232916) and the closest thing I came up to it was the promo soundtrack.

But I digress, now I don't have anything left to say that already hasn't been said.

RacinReaver Jan 20, 2009 05:25 AM

Quote:

sun's going dark and the crew of the Icarus II has to deliver a payload of all of Earth's remaining nuclear-capable material into the core of the sun to re-ignite it
:psyduck:

BlindMonk Jan 20, 2009 12:00 PM

http://i43.tinypic.com/8xinas.gif

Paco Jan 20, 2009 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacinReaver (Post 675435)
:psyduck:

Oh, it's quite alright, boyo. He did say that the science was, you know, "iffy".

russ Jan 20, 2009 01:00 PM

The movie isn't about the science, it is about the triumph of the human spirit, exception being the captain of the Icarus I.

Kaiten Jan 21, 2009 12:18 AM

The best part is after reading a few articles about Sunshine, it was stated that Cilian Murphy converted to atheism after finishing the film.

Was the captain of Icarus I that much of a fundamentalist douche have him arrive at that decision?

Paco Jan 21, 2009 01:09 AM

Not that I thought Cillian Murphy was the best actor of our generation, but if ACTING A PART is all it took for him to make a life-changing decision like, oh, throwing his soul into the depths of hell, then he's kind of a prat. Isn't he?

Lord Styphon Jan 21, 2009 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encephalon (Post 675677)
Not that I thought Cillian Murphy was the best actor of our generation, but if ACTING A PART is all it took for him to make a life-changing decision like, oh, throwing his soul into the depths of hell, then he's kind of a prat. Isn't he?

Maybe all the bad science broke his brain.

Paco Jan 21, 2009 01:37 AM

That was an awfully easy brain to break. If only they were all like that. :/

BlindMonk Jan 21, 2009 01:15 PM

I was just playing with psyduck. I had seen the film and the whole "science" line is a non-issue when it comes to rousing, popcorn entertainment. The film is very good dramatically, the visual concepts are engaging and always interesting, and the only real hitch is when Boyle tries to convey the "mood and force of madness" towards film's end, achieving something closer to hilarity than tension with the demented cap'n and his camera effects. (The cast is very good, but I personally would've enjoyed a more wizened or older crew for such a mission of human survival. I suppose the youngish demographic won out in representation, as there's no one in it with quite the stature of a Hiroyuki Sanada -- who feels like a grandfather compared to the rest of the characters.)

LZ Jan 21, 2009 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encephalon (Post 675677)
Not that I thought Cillian Murphy was the best actor of our generation, but if ACTING A PART is all it took for him to make a life-changing decision like, oh, throwing his soul into the depths of hell, then he's kind of a prat. Isn't he?

Nope because hell doesn't exist. :forscience:

BlindMonk Jan 21, 2009 04:41 PM

http://i42.tinypic.com/20f7ofb.png

Jessykins Jan 21, 2009 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encephalon (Post 675677)
Not that I thought Cillian Murphy was the best actor of our generation, but if ACTING A PART is all it took for him to make a life-changing decision like, oh, throwing his soul into the depths of hell, then he's kind of a prat. Isn't he?

But if you convert to atheism, isn't the concept of condemning yourself to Hell not even a factor?

Either way, I liked Sunshine. Not Boyle's best, but I still found it entertaining.

russ Jan 21, 2009 06:23 PM

Can you even really convert to atheism? Seems more like something that you'd one day be like "eh, fuck it" and that would be that. Converting implies that you had to actively do something.

Kaiten Jan 22, 2009 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jessykins <3 (Post 675824)
But if you convert to atheism, isn't the concept of condemning yourself to Hell not even a factor?

Either way, I liked Sunshine. Not Boyle's best, but I still found it entertaining.

On a similar note is Trainspotting any good?

Paco Jan 22, 2009 01:31 AM

FUCK YES. It's his best movie by miles.

Crash "Long-Winded Wrong Answer" Landon Jan 22, 2009 01:34 AM

I am posting to endorse Encephalon's endorsement of Trainspotting.

Seriously. Go watch it. Now.

We will wait.

YO PITTSBURGH MIKE HERE Jan 22, 2009 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encephalon (Post 676000)
FUCK YES. It's his best movie by miles.

Um.

http://img118.imageshack.us/img118/6...mdog460of9.jpg

Paco Jan 22, 2009 03:34 AM

Isn't that The Kite Runner? That was Marc Forster, guy.

Jessykins Jan 22, 2009 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Encephalon (Post 676018)
Isn't that The Kite Runner? That was Marc Forster, guy.

Quote:

slumdog460of9.jpg
Lay off the tequila, Paco.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.