Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Media Centre (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Project Cloverfield a.k.a The JJ Abrams trailer before Transformers starts. (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=22923)

Grail Jul 3, 2007 12:50 PM

Project Cloverfield a.k.a The JJ Abrams trailer before Transformers starts.
 
Alright, so I go into Transformers thinking it was going to be a kick ass movie (which it was) and so I get there 30 minutes early to avoid the huge crowd.

The previews start up, and there is a new Adam Sandler movie where everyone laughed and that was about it.

Then it cuts to a movie where the camera is nothing more than a home video camera capturing a going away party for some guy. Everyone is having a good time, drinking, laughing, telling the camera they'll miss the guy.

Then something like an earthquake hits, shaking the entire building and forcing the lights to go dim. The earthquake stops and everyone is going "What the hell was that? Let's go see if any is alright up on the roof." It was a big party.

So on the rooftop it seems everyone's alright, but the entire city is blacked out, and someone says that their friend should have left a day early. Then there it is, a roar, and the camera shifts to the left to see the middle of Manhattan go up in explosion. Everyone starts screaming and running, the camera cutting out as they run down the stairs.

Outside everyone is running towards and past the camera man and from above an object comes flying towards him, landing right behind him and skidding, it's the statue of liberties head, and then the monsterous roar sounds off again.

No title after that, just says "J.J. Abrams" and then 1-28-2008

From the roar I'm banking it's a giant monster movie, of course, but insted of it being big budget, it's all shot through people with video cameras. Needless to say with the set up of the trailer, it got my adrenaline going, which very few movies do that. I'd love to know more about this movie, but I guess no one even knew it was being made before it was shown before Transformers.

Any ideas of what it could be? I was personally hoping for another Godzilla :tpg:

Simo Jul 3, 2007 06:23 PM

Ain't It Cool News broke the story on Cloverfield a few weeks ago and according to them it is a giant monster movie with the creature being called "The Parasite" for now.

Other than that and the director being the guy who did The Pallbearer there isn't really much else known about the project.

jouhou Jul 3, 2007 10:34 PM

I can't stand the "amateur home video" style. I can deal with 2 minute videos on youtube but over an hour of it... no, it makes me dizzy and nauseous. The image will always be unclear and the camera will be constantly shaking. It makes me think Blair Witch Project, I never seen it but I've seen the commercials.

[RANT]
A bitch running around screaming and all you see is the floor. Then they film themselves with boogers oozing out their nose. Snort that shit back in or blow your freaking nose, I don't wanna see your snot!

Divest Jul 4, 2007 02:42 PM

If you're going to make a big monster movie, it needs to be big budget.

Otherwise... :/

knkwzrd Jul 4, 2007 02:44 PM

Well, from the trailer they didn't cut costs on special effects, just camera work. I jouhou on the handheld issue though. Looks like crap.

ctu Jul 4, 2007 03:42 PM

Right now we don't even know if that how the whole movie will be or just that one part of it. I am going to have to see that movie when it comes out.

Grail Jul 4, 2007 03:53 PM

Appearantly, rumors say, is that the whole movie is going to be shot with hand held cameras, from different civillians caught up in the matter.

Problem with Blair Witch is that th acting in it was god damn horrible, and unbelievable. you don't see anything in it but a god damn ear cut off, and some guy standing in the corner before some bitch gets knocked out. Hype is why anyone went and saw that movie, and it was a peice of shit.

This, however, actually shows you what's going on around them, and if you thought any of the camera was too shakey excluding them running down the stairs, well, never play a FPS as long as you live.

guyinrubbersuit Jul 5, 2007 01:28 AM

I'm very interested in this movie. I don't mind the handheld camera and I gathered from the trailer that it'll probably be done from the persective of the average citizen bringing it down to a more personal level.

I really loved how the trailer opened up. I thought it was going to be some lame love type story or something and then BAM it comes out of no where with an 'earthquake' and an explosion. Definitely grabbed my attention.

Hantei Jul 5, 2007 02:30 AM

Haha, when I saw that trailer during the Previews, that was just one big WTF for me. The movie seemed like a pass at first, but once the explosions and quakes happend it got so exciting. Then they ended it without title or look at what the monster/creature/giant is.

Could this possibly be a new Godzilla movie? Cause some of the things kinda hint at that possibly (eg. the guy going to Japan, roars, fire, explosions, people saying it's something big, the monster itself big enough to toss the head of the Statue of Liberty).

WolfDemon Jul 5, 2007 03:38 AM

I like the handheld camera view. It makes it all look real. I know if I saw an actual video of some giant fucking monster tearing up a city, I'd be scared shitless. If the whole movie is like this, I bet it's gonna be awesome. I'm willing to forget Blair Witch and give it a chance.

jouhou Jul 5, 2007 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hantei (Post 465453)
Could this possibly be a new Godzilla movie? Cause some of the things kinda hint at that possibly (eg. the guy going to Japan, roars, fire, explosions, people saying it's something big, the monster itself big enough to toss the head of the Statue of Liberty).

No, it should be some other creature. Besides, I don't think anyone is going to try a Godzilla movie after the American GINO (Godzilla-in-name-only) movie.


Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfDemon (Post 465479)
I like the handheld camera view. It makes it all look real. I know if I saw an actual video of some giant fucking monster tearing up a city, I'd be scared shitless. If the whole movie is like this, I bet it's gonna be awesome. I'm willing to forget Blair Witch and give it a chance.

Yes, I'm betting that's the approach they're after. I don't like that it's amateur video but I will admit that it is a pretty good idea. We'll just have to wait and see how it rolls out. The story, way it unravels, and elements of a movie can make it worth watching regardless of budget/or whatever. If it catches my attention I'll just do something like watch it in intervals.

nazpyro Jul 7, 2007 12:30 AM

Oh this! When I saw the trailer, my first thought was "Eww, what's this?" Then it was *BOOM* headshot, and I was stunned. I got pretty cised and excited too, but I didn't know how much was actually unknown about this film until I saw some news articles just today regarding an increase in "JJ Abrams" queries on Google and stuff. So yeah, it's not gonna be out for a while, but I'm pretty stoked for it.

K_ Takahashi Jul 7, 2007 12:58 AM

Had to remember what this was called (because I thought it was the title of the film you know, for simultaneous date in the film gimmick or something)

Actually, I didn't know what the hell was fucking shit up (theater is kinda shitty). It will seem intereting enough to see when it comes out

Divest Jul 7, 2007 03:05 PM

I saw the trailer and I have to say this looks awesome. Reading what people said about it, I thought this was an attempt to be a low budget hand-held flick (aka: Blair Witch bullshit) and those are always awful.

Fortunately it looked really awesome. I can't wait until this film comes out. Sure, the camera work might be a little annoying and make me nautious but that's what will make or break this film. I just hope this doesn't become a trend.

I can already see all the battery died, ran out of film, found a new battery and or film four hours later after all the exciting stuff happened bullshit coming from a mile away, but maybe they'll prove me wrong (hopefully).

Grail Jul 7, 2007 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 467194)
I can already see all the battery died, ran out of film, found a new battery and or film four hours later after all the exciting stuff happened bullshit coming from a mile away, but maybe they'll prove me wrong (hopefully).

i really can't see them doing this coming from a logical standpoint. I mean, the camera -might- get turned off from time to time, maybe they accidently hit it or something, I'm not sure.

But if I was running from a huge fucking monster, I wouldn't necessarily look at my camera and go "Fooey, my battery has run dead, I must scurry to the nearest retailer and purchase another!"

K_ Takahashi Jul 8, 2007 12:38 AM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...94809056&hl=en

trailer.

Grail Jul 8, 2007 03:59 AM

I could kiss you <3

makura Jul 8, 2007 05:00 AM

Damn, they're turning this into some wicked online game to find out what this movie is all about.

http://www.ethanhaaswasright.com/
http://www.1-18-08.com/

solutions to puzzles from ethanhaaswasright.com can be found here
http://fallingsky.blogs.com/falling_...overfield.html and..
http://thebraxcave.com/2007/07/05/so...aas-was-right/

Spoiler:
Message after you finish all the puzzles say that something will happen on August 1st.

jouhou Jul 8, 2007 09:20 AM

Ok, now that I've finally seen the trailer I can comment properly. This movie looks awesome. Before seeing the trailer, I was worried about poor lighting but they did a pretty good job in the trailers. I just hope my eyes can handle shaking picture on the big screen.

rockthepartay Jul 8, 2007 11:08 AM

Am I the only one that thinks this is going to be a spinoff movie for Lost or something? I know it's not going to be, but it would be awesome.

I love how J.J. Abrams pretty much uses the same material but presents it in interesting new ways.

Well, I'm looking forward to it.

Faust 72 Jul 8, 2007 01:59 PM

I hope this is something to do with Chtulu.

makura Jul 8, 2007 06:08 PM

Matchmoving the special effects with the shaky camera is crazy.

Here's an article that talks about some casting as well as filming locations.

Grail Jul 9, 2007 01:52 AM

Okay I don't knwo what the fuck it is about this movie, and what it's doing, but it's freaking me the fuck out.

www.1-18-08.com There are two things in that website that has to be noted. I put it in spoilers for those that want to find them for themselves. The two pictures definately have some weird shit going on in them.

Spoiler:
The picture of the two women, in the middle there is a face of the devil in their hair...BUT

if you photoshop or MSpaint it...split the picture down the middle, then line up each face...it forms a perfectly shapped face it seems...the two girls in that photo are the same girl.

And in the other picture, with the guy in the party...he is downing a drink, but...his eyes are pure black, and when you look closer, it looks like he's in pain, and spread like he's being crucified.


Dear god this has me freaked.

Skexis Jul 9, 2007 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faust 72 (Post 467677)
I hope this is something to do with Chtulu.

That would be so fucking badass. Some kind of mainstream media that could actually pay tribute to the lore.

I actually never had a problem with Blair Witch. I've always been about delayed gratification, so all the scare tactics without the monster was what made me enjoy the whole experience. Hell, I even liked the horrible sequel, to a certain extent. And I liked the acting as far as it was authentic. People who just behaved how they thought folks would in that situation, instead of trying too hard and making artifice out of acting.

Needless to say I'll be at this one on day one. I'm torn whether I should try to research it going in or just go in cold and let it all be a surprise, though.

Grail Jul 9, 2007 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skexis (Post 468009)
That would be so fucking badass. Some kind of mainstream media that could actually pay tribute to the lore.

I actually never had a problem with Blair Witch. I've always been about delayed gratification, so all the scare tactics without the monster was what made me enjoy the whole experience. Hell, I even liked the horrible sequel, to a certain extent. And I liked the acting as far as it was authentic. People who just behaved how they thought folks would in that situation, instead of trying too hard and making artifice out of acting.

I thought I heard somewhere that there wasn't even a script to the blair witch project. That they would just impromptuly add shit in there to freak the kids out.

Kilroy Jul 9, 2007 08:31 AM

I'd bend over and take it from the first person who makes a decent Cthulhu movie.
Interesting to see where this is going. I've always considered Davey Jones as the prelude to a Cthulhu-flick, so I got my hopes up.

jouhou Jul 9, 2007 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 468004)
Okay I don't knwo what the fuck it is about this movie, and what it's doing, but it's freaking me the fuck out.

www.1-18-08.com There are two things in that website that has to be noted. I put it in spoilers for those that want to find them for themselves. The two pictures definately have some weird shit going on in them.

Spoiler:
The picture of the two women, in the middle there is a face of the devil in their hair...BUT

if you photoshop or MSpaint it...split the picture down the middle, then line up each face...it forms a perfectly shapped face it seems...the two girls in that photo are the same girl.

And in the other picture, with the guy in the party...he is downing a drink, but...his eyes are pure black, and when you look closer, it looks like he's in pain, and spread like he's being crucified.


Dear god this has me freaked.

I think you're starring at the picture too long.... your mind is playing tricks on yourself. Have you ever seen that picture where it looks like a girl's crotch but then it ends up being a zoomed in picture of a guy's armpit? Yeap, mind tricks...
But the dragging pictures on the site is cool. I just fling them around and put the girls on the bottom left and the guy is on the top right so it looks like the girls are admiring his downing skills.....

Dizzy Jul 9, 2007 03:01 PM

The idea seems pretty cool....to mess up your mind like that. The monster being a cluthlu doesn't seems a bad idea at all.

Anyways, here's what Grail was talking about (The two women):


Monster with horns


I didn't photoshoped the pics, I found them in: http://ethanhaasthoughts.blogspot.com/

makura Jul 10, 2007 12:59 AM

Teaser is officially up at apple.com
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/11808/

Also, JJ Abrams say that the Ethan Haas site has nothing to do with the movie..
whaaa...
source

then again.. He could be lying to us.

LZ Jul 10, 2007 11:14 AM

The mystery has been cracked (not by me)

http://www.slusho.jp/index.html

Not even joking. Check this screenshot from about halfway into the trailer, after the news report:

http://victor645.googlepages.com/slusho.jpg

Rock Jul 10, 2007 11:53 AM

Just watched the trailer again. No big deal, but I discovered an Xbox 360 on the desk on the left at the 0:45 mark. ;-)

Mystery cracked: THIS IS EARTH DEFENSE FORCE 2017 - THE MOVIE

Sepharite Jul 10, 2007 04:56 PM

edit: nevemrind..

Dark Nation Jul 10, 2007 05:03 PM

A Giant WORM? OH come on... that's the lamest possible giant monster next to Baby Godzilla.

Sepharite Jul 10, 2007 05:08 PM

LOL. That's what I thought, but it was a joke.

Some a still referring it to "The Parasite". However, still nothing confirmed.

Dark Nation Jul 10, 2007 05:11 PM

Oh I see the edit now. Well still I was definetly drawn in when there was that explosion. It looked at first like some lame romance or 'road-trip' movie, but then I was starting to think through the commercial of what it could be about.

Heroes, Lost, Godzilla and even the generic "giant earthquake" movie all went through my mind. Can't wait to see more.

The rumors about it being related to Ctuhulu has me pretty interested.

Sepharite Jul 10, 2007 05:12 PM

Edit: The Ethan site has nothing to do with the movie.

http://www.ff0000.com/

XtremeDJW Jul 13, 2007 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LZ (Post 468756)
Not even joking. Check this screenshot from about halfway into the trailer, after the news report:

http://victor645.googlepages.com/slusho.jpg

Am I meant to see something here?

Am I missing something as well regarding a giant worm?

Shenlon Jul 13, 2007 08:27 AM

I thought at first this was suppose to be D-War which also seems like a cool monster movie but the story is just a little bleh ~_~
This movie looks interesting so I hope they release a full trailer soon since there hasn't been any good monster movies since The Host.

LZ Jul 13, 2007 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XtremeDJW (Post 470638)
Am I meant to see something here?

Am I missing something as well regarding a giant worm?

well he is wearing a slusho shirt (slusho is not a real food/drink) which means that, considering the website, it is probably a major plot point

I'm guessing the movie is about a drink with a secret ingredient that fucks things up and makes things really big

Grail Jul 13, 2007 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LZ (Post 468756)
The mystery has been cracked (not by me)

http://www.slusho.jp/index.html

Not even joking. Check this screenshot from about halfway into the trailer, after the news report:

http://victor645.googlepages.com/slusho.jpg

You know what's funny, on that website it says "You can't just drink six" I think 3 times throughout that whole website, counting the japanese number...so the whole 666 things comes into play if i"m correct, and not just reading fully into it.

Divest Jul 14, 2007 12:02 AM

God I hope Cthulu is in this movie.

PLEASE let Cthulu be in this movie and not some stupid fucking worm.

DukeBox Jul 15, 2007 01:12 AM

CTHULHU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*Swoooooons*:cthulhu::tpg:










(sorry, it's been a while since I've been here, and I only just noticed the cthulhu emoticon... couldn't resist... cthulhu demanded it, and I dare not question :eagletear: )

Grail Jul 15, 2007 12:58 PM

New picture is up at http://www.1-18-08.com/

four people, huge bright light behind them...can't see anything with the picture yet, but go at it people!

Robo Jesus Jul 17, 2007 03:40 AM

Ok, a lot of people have been dissecting the blogs and whatnot that have popped up around this film. Lots of morse code, sandscrit, things of that nature have popped up. Lovecraft does have some influence in at least the viral marketing of this film, though that doesn't mean this is going to be a film about Cthulhu (though things such as "Only 8-1-07 matters to our cause..." do point towards the case of a Cthulhu connection in some manner (the date being one of the Dates worked out by people with too much time on their hands as a very likely time that Cthulhu would awaken)). There is also talk of J.J. Abrams letting something slip about a seamonster, though if it was said, it was very quickly removed from the interview.

I got bored and read the comments from three of the posts at the http://ethanhaaswaswrong.blogspot.com/ blog. Examples of some of the random shit that have been worked out of the puzzles and games from the blogs would be like this little gem here.


Quote:

Originally Posted by http://ethanhaaswaswrong.blogspot.com/
How easily humanity is mislead….

The Mezin feared that your kind might be so easily distracted, that All may be lead by One down the garden path, that your eyes and minds may be so easily clouded. You point to a date in the future that means nothing to our cause or your future...

Only 8-1-07 matters to our cause...

We have been here since mankind fought with sticks and bones, your technology may have improved but can the same be said for the human mind,

Most certainly a vile manipulator like Van Mantra will exploit this weakness in the masses and lead you all to ruin.

Clearly there are some among you who know the truth and may even be worthy of the Mezin, who have strength of mind and will to see what truly awaits and are not distracted…

The time has come for us to reveal the methods of Haas, we have found his writing and will now expose them for the nonsense that they are...


So far I'm enjoying the fact that the people in charge of the viral marketing are insulting people and no one has really noticed it yet. Utter brilliance!:D


EDIT; a blogger by the screenname of Pete put up an interesting idea. I'll quote what he said.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete
Does this have anything to do with the NIN album called Year Zero? The reason i say this is because it kinda sounds like the videos, they all featured an "entity" they called "The Presence"

Reznor admitted he's already in talks about a movie version of his upcoming album.

He had earlier noted Year Zero as "part of a bigger picture of a number of things I'm working on. Essentially, I wrote the soundtrack to a movie that doesn't exist."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Zero_(album).


randomwab Jul 19, 2007 08:33 AM

First thing I thought was Half-Life, although I doubt that's true. Alien invasion of earth or the Seven Hour Wars told through film? And first person footage would fit a very Half-Life style. Maybe it's just me.

Grail Jul 22, 2007 11:55 AM

A forth picture is up at 1-18-08.com Seems that there is a military man escorting people out of the area or something, the picture is slightly blurred.

WolfDemon Jul 23, 2007 01:35 AM

According to my cousin, a lot of people think that it might be a Voltron movie. Apparently they get that from a line in the trailer right before the Statue of Liberty's head is thrown; a guy shouting "It's a lion! It's moving!"

He also pointed out how the destruction is very reminiscent of Lavos. Huge dome-shaped explosion, fireballs falling from the sky, etc. He doesn't think it's a Chrono Trigger movie, of course, but he thought it was kinda funny.

Grail Jul 23, 2007 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfDemon (Post 476978)
According to my cousin, a lot of people think that it might be a Voltron movie. Apparently they get that from a line in the trailer right before the Statue of Liberty's head is thrown; a guy shouting "It's a lion! It's moving!"

He also pointed out how the destruction is very reminiscent of Lavos. Huge dome-shaped explosion, fireballs falling from the sky, etc. He doesn't think it's a Chrono Trigger movie, of course, but he thought it was kinda funny.

People actually thought it was a Power Rangers movie. Truth is though it's not a voltron movie, and while even I think he says "It's a lion, it's huge" people from the film have said he actually says "I'ts alive, it's huge!"

That, and already they have debunked several theories, even Cthuhlu since they said the monster is completely original, and organic. On top of that, a different company owns the rights to Voltron, so that's out.

Divest Jul 23, 2007 04:19 AM

Dammit, it's not going to be Cthulu? :/

Grail Jul 23, 2007 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 477053)
Dammit, it's not going to be Cthulu? :/

Well, someone has leaked how the movie starts. There is a website that has an annoynamous source, (which could mean that it's completely false, but who knows) stating that the movie begins with either two children, or two police officers/detectives walking down a board walk of NYC and stumble across a camera left in the aftermath of the attack and begin to watch it.

So, if we take the fact that Cthuhlu is indeed an almighty creature of destruction, bringing the end of the world with it, one would think that there would be no survivors in the world period.

Then again, Cthuhlu probably has never taken on Hilary Clinton either.

Kilroy Jul 23, 2007 01:34 PM

Well, he did awake in 1925, at 47° 9' S, 126° 43' W without the world coming to an end, so he might have continued his slumber.

Divest Jul 23, 2007 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 477218)
Then again, Cthuhlu probably has never taken on Hilary Clinton either

:D

All I can say is that I'm seeing this the first day it comes out, no matter what it is.

The hype they're building around this movie is really, really, really creepy. It makes me tingle a little bit inside. I just really wish it was a Cthulu movie where everyone in the world dies at the end, but I doubt that's going to be the case.

Still, I remain hopeful.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 477233)
Well, he did awake in 1925, at 47° 9' S, 126° 43' W without the world coming to an end, so he might have continued his slumber.

What the hell are you talking about?

Megalith Jul 23, 2007 04:42 PM

Sorry, but I'm not going to fall for the hype. Clever marketing, yes, but in the end, it WILL be the monster invasion edition of Blair Witch. But actually, I don't think there's any real proof that the movie will be in "handycam" vision at all...they could have just used that concept to create an amusing trailer.

In any case, I'd much rather wait for something like AT THE MOUNTAINS OF MADNESS, who Del Toro is supposedly doing after Hellboy 2.

Robo Jesus Jul 23, 2007 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy
Well, he did awake in 1925, at 47° 9' S, 126° 43' W without the world coming to an end, so he might have continued his slumber.

Funny thing about that. Bloop is apparently connected to this somehow. Funny thing about Bloop, it seems to have happened almost exactly near the coordinates as the events in "The Call of Cthulhu".

Congle line of abuse. Or is that conga-line. Or congaline. Jul 23, 2007 07:42 PM

I'm not sure why people keep comparing this to Blair Witch, from what i seen on the trailer the thing looks to be pretty high-quality as far as hand-held cameras go. I really doubt it's going to be ANYTHING like Blair Witch in terms of cinematography, which caused massive headaches.

Also the trailer freaked me out, I hate it when they seriously hype up a huge secret plot/monster, and leaving you wanting answers. They better do a damn good job, I really hate to be disapointed in this situation. :D

Kilroy Jul 24, 2007 03:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robo Jesus (Post 477492)
Funny thing about that. Bloop is apparently connected to this somehow. Funny thing about Bloop, it seems to have happened almost exactly near the coordinates as the events in "The Call of Cthulhu".

That's actually pretty interesting. Going to read that stuff now. Who knows, perhaps the Bloop is infact a gigantic snore from the sleeping Cthulhu!

Tagonist Aug 2, 2007 07:35 PM

For some reason the monster's scream reminded me of the "Bloop"...
But then again that might only be because I had something about this being a Cthullhu movie...
I haven't watched Lost, so is it possible that this is a Lost-movie?
For a second there I thought of a Metal Gear Solid movie, with the "monster" being Arsenal... Would somewhat fit Abrams portfolio with Alias and M:I 3.
Whatever it is, they got a pretty neat marketing campaign going.
As to the Year Zero theory, I don't think so... Trent's remark was probably just metaphorical in being about "a movie not yet made...".

Sepharite Aug 2, 2007 07:55 PM

Did anyone see the new poster? This is one of the three:

http://i14.tinypic.com/62n8heu.jpg

And here's the transcript of JJ at Comic-con:
Quote:

JJ Abrams comes out (wearing an Infocom shirt, to boot!) and in extremely rapid-fire fashion he tells us, “I wanted a monster movies, and had taken my son to Japan, and there were all these Godzilla dolls everywhere.” *cheers from the audience* “However, I decided we needed our own monster. We’re not showing any footage, but we’re almost done shooting, and I think you’ll love it. We aren’t revealing a title today.” *boos from the audience* “What would you think if we called it Monstruous?” *Puzzled reaction from crowd.* “Anyhow, we’ll see. We have a new poster out, and you’ll be getting that today. I can’t wait for you to see this.. Bye!
http://www.cloverfieldnews.com/

rpgcrazied Aug 5, 2007 09:47 PM

Just saw the preview to this, at first I thought it was gonna be a lame love/chick flick or something. Looks really cool

Im sure its not godzilla... but its gotta be some type of monster/alien

dagget Nov 17, 2007 12:10 AM

New trailer appeared before Beowulf.

It's on Youtube (it's a shitty recorded version, kinda loud)

YouTube - 1.18.08 cloverfield trailer (2)

Paramount's been taking these down left and right. The film is actually called...

Cloverfield

The embedding has been disabled. :(

Hantei Nov 17, 2007 01:14 AM

Just got back from Beowulf and saw the trailer. It was alright definitely didn't have the same impact as the first. Then again they showed nothing of the beast, so I guess that could be why.

Officially titled "Cloverfield", heh don't really see why you needed to tag it dagget as your link gave the away the title too.

dagget Nov 17, 2007 01:25 AM

Well it had been "fan subbed" Project: Cloverfield for ages, I just tagged it incase someone had a stick up their ass saying it was a spoiler. :P

Tagonist Nov 17, 2007 05:19 AM

Well, I guess it's hard to push another hype-inducing trailer like the first one after, well, the first one.
I'd hate them to unveil the beast in a trailer. Way too many trailers out there giving away everything (Golden Compass, Beowulf, I'm looking at you!) so you basically don't need to go watch the movie if you were lucky and got the trailer before some other film...
Still appears interesting enough for a "monster movie" though.

jouhou Nov 18, 2007 10:44 AM

What if they don't even show the monster at all? Wouldn't that be a huge disappointment. HAHAH. But this reminds me of American Godzilla (GINO). Everyone was so hyped to see how he looked since he wasn't shown in the trailers but a lot of people were disappointed. But this is a bit different, there's no name for the monster so there's no way for anyone to anticipate what kind of monster it'll be.

Tagonist Nov 18, 2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jouhou (Post 535075)
What if they don't even show the monster at all? Wouldn't that be a huge disappointment. HAHAH.

Considering how the monster was handled in Lost, I'd not even be surprised if they actually did that. And... I'd like it. Okay, I'd be a LITTLE surprised that they had the guts to pull such a thing off, but then again, it's Abrams. He can get away with things like that...
Just like the Rabbit's Foot in M:I 3.

black100 Nov 22, 2007 10:51 AM

Hey guys, just thought I'd come in here and tell you that the second trailer has been released on several websites in a higher resolution.

Go watch it some time you pause the screen at 1:29. I'll wait until some of you do it before I start discussing it.

dagget Nov 23, 2007 01:26 AM

480p Trailer

1080p Trailer

Right-click save-as. (no need to change the extension on these)

Kilroy Nov 23, 2007 05:13 AM

Is it just me, or are there several humans in the trailer that looks... odd? I mean, like they have extra parts or scales or something attached to them?

Divest Nov 24, 2007 05:59 PM

I swear on the new trailer I can see something and it looks like the monster...

But I can't really tell because I don't have my glasses for the next couple weeks. :(

It's right near the end of the trailer where the bridge is going up in the sky. In the back near the middle of the screen I THINK I see something. I'm not sure of the exact time stamp because my player doesn't show it. Upon further squinting I see that it may just be a piece of the bridge but ah who knows.

Krelian Nov 24, 2007 06:09 PM

Video of Cloverfield Monster - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

It's there. Briefly. In part.

I want it to be Cthulhu THIS MUCH.

Divest Nov 24, 2007 06:14 PM

Me too.

If only because I'll get to tell all my friends "See I told you bad ass this monster is!"

Honestly though... that monster doesn't look much like I would imagine Cthulhu looking... as a matter of fact, it looks sort of like a lizard. If this is a Godzilla movie I think I would CRY.

Vemp Nov 24, 2007 10:34 PM

It's actually FFX the movie. Big seamonster with scales? Sin.

Skexis Nov 24, 2007 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 538722)
It's right near the end of the trailer where the bridge is going up in the sky. In the back near the middle of the screen I THINK I see something. I'm not sure of the exact time stamp because my player doesn't show it. Upon further squinting I see that it may just be a piece of the bridge but ah who knows.

http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/8...4215934yf2.jpg
Looks like a piece of the bridge to me as well. Too uniform to be a monster.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 538049)
Is it just me, or are there several humans in the trailer that looks... odd? I mean, like they have extra parts or scales or something attached to them?

Not sure which ones you mean, but if you mean at the military base, I think those were just hazmat suits.
http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/9...4220714qe3.jpg

Regardless, I'm pretty sure this will be a day-one-see for me. I love the notion of the unknown making its way into movies again. Too many fucking movies have to make the payoff blatant and ridiculous because it leaves nothing to the imagination. I imagine if the monster does make an appearance in the film, it will be with a specific purpose in mind, rather than just for the sake of pleasing the audience.

Grail Nov 24, 2007 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 538049)
Is it just me, or are there several humans in the trailer that looks... odd? I mean, like they have extra parts or scales or something attached to them?

I'm not sure, I didn't see anyone with scales in the trailer, but something else intrigued me to no end.

Go and watch the trailer again, and when it gets to around 1:10 to 1:20 mark, as the soldiers are running by, in the background there is a screen, where it seems two men are dragging a screaming woman...and just before it cuts out, her abdomen like, expands as if something is bursting from it.

At least that's what the shadow looks like.

Yeah, Skexis got the picture right, just not at the right part. The second one.

Skexis Nov 24, 2007 11:13 PM

The military guy with his face blurred out says something like "There's nothing we can do for her now," and it seemed like he was talking about the woman who was chained to the wall nearby.

http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/7...4222119aw2.jpg
It's possible the monster will have parasite children or minions, which would make sense for the underground subway chase. My gut is telling me that it's just a trick of the light, though, and the film will be used to talk about the way the military reacts to an unknown invading force. (Quarantine, by choice or by force!)

Divest Nov 24, 2007 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skexis (Post 538875)
It's possible the monster will have parasite children or minions, which would make sense for the underground subway chase.

Cthulhi, I can only hope.

Nall Nov 24, 2007 11:46 PM

You know, I haven't thought of this film until yesterday (I saw the preview at Transformers and must've forgot about it :eagletear:) but they're are a lot of peculiar things in this film's marketing, especially the Slusho! site. Oddly enough, even though other sites like "Evan Haas was Right" were immediately shot debunked by JJ Abrams, Slusho! remains active. Add that to the fact that the main character (Evan) is wearing a Slusho! shirt in the trailer, and the site being registered just one day before the Transformers premier, it does serve as a definite reference point.

Lots of kooky stuff on the site, but if you look at the company history section, you get the following:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Slusho.jp
Slusho! story is of magic and triumph!

Noriko Yoshida dedicated her life to Refreshment! Her classmates called her the Smallest Whale because she would drink endless amounts of beverages at every meal.

Truth was Noriko loved libations so much, and drank so much, she did not join while the other children opened their fun, she rather experimented with flavor mixtures - combining different fruits, vegetables and other ingredients naturally grown from her father's (Ryouta Yoshida) farm to make great new beverages.

Her deliciousness made her loved throughout many towns and villages of Honshu.

And Every year she would try to beat herself by coming up with a new flavor mixture, so unique to anything else - she was never satisfied!

But tragedy struck for the Smallest Whale! Noriko set off on a sea adventure to find the greatest, tastiest ingredient to the world, and was never heard from again!

She left behind her only son, Ganu! Ganu also liked to experiment, but not with the beverage-making enterprise that killed his mother, but for science!

He abandoned his mother's drink business to his cousin because the pain of her loss was so great with every flavor mixture Ganu attempted. Truth is that he became a lead ocean scientist. His accomplishments are many, he is very big.

And one fateful day, he and his teammates discovered a deep sea ingredient unique to anything else!!! While the team pondered miraculous ways to use it, Ganu had the best idea of all!! Because that night he had a dream - he was a tiny fish, and a whale came and told him to drink the new ingredient. And as he did drink lots and lots of the ingredient, Ganu grew from a small fish into an enormous whale!!! He woke up with tears, he knew he had found the magic ingredient Noriko had set off to find!

He decided the would make his mother's dream live - make the tastiest drink, unlike anything on earth! Because the ingredient was discovered on the deep ocean floor, under amazing pressure and in the most extreme cold, Ganu knew he had to serve the ingredient in a near-frozen state to preserve its freshness!!

He re-joined with his cousin, and combining the incredible drink-making knowledge of Noriko's business with the new ingredient, SLUSHO! came to life!!!!!

Everyone who drinks SLUSHO! tastes Noriko's dream, and becomes a small whale like Noriko - because you want to drink large amounts of SLUSHO!

YOU CAN'T DRINK JUST SIX!!!

If that's not a monster movie plot, I don't know what is! It's hard to tell exactly what it means, but a mad scientist peddling soft drinks is almost certainly involved. The special ingredient is identified as "Sea Nectar", and though it may just be a throw-away word on the site, take a look at 1-18-08.com.

There's one picture that doesn't seem to fit in with the rest, or have a time stamp: the Asian man with the pan of food. If you look on the back, there's some kanji that translates to the following:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1-18-08
Thank you for checking us out! We are Introducing this week's tasty one dish. Make sure you eat it cold!

Skinless chicken breast - 2, cut in halves Sōmen noodles - 10 oz. Watercress - 1/2 cup cut into small strips Turnip - 1/2 cup, thinly sliced Shiitake Mushrooms - 1/2 cup Chicken stock - 1/3 cup Sake - 2 tbsp. Sugar - 1/2 tsp. Deep Sea Nectar - 1 pinch

In a small saucepan, stir together 1/3 cup water, chicken stock, sake, and sugar. Chill it until it becomes cold. Grill the chicken breast on both sides for about 8 minutes, and then chill. Boil the noodles for about 3 minutes, and then run under cold water until chilled. Mix the watercress, radish, and mushrooms into the sōmen. Slice the chicken thinly and arrange on top of the sōmen mix. Just before you serve, put the deep sea nectar in the sauce and pour over the noodles generously.

Go Go Delicious Chef!

Sea Nectar again. Not only that, but the picture will take you to a special website of a fictional company called TAGRUATO, which, according to the Slusho! site, is it's parent corporation.

What does all this mean? I have no idea! But one thing's for sure, if Slusho! *is* involved at all, and not just a marketing ploy, the creature is most likely water-based. Giant crab, a turtle, some aquatic primordial reptile, whatever.

Divest Dec 14, 2007 06:28 PM

I don't know if you guys know this but you can watch the first five minutes of the movie here.

Also, this image has been cleaned up a bit and here's what became of it:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...5850829105.gif

It definitely looks like some sort of Godzilla-esque creature going there.

Hantei Dec 15, 2007 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skexis (Post 538875)
http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/7...4222119aw2.jpg
It's possible the monster will have parasite children or minions, which would make sense for the underground subway chase. My gut is telling me that it's just a trick of the light, though, and the film will be used to talk about the way the military reacts to an unknown invading force. (Quarantine, by choice or by force!)

Man, I just caught that today too. The girl in the silhouette and the 2 guys in radiation suits, or something, trying retrain her. I don't think that's a trick of the light, man, that defintiely is messed up! I mean, the girl is even screaming. Now I'm really anxious to see this movie!

Inhert Dec 15, 2007 12:19 AM

I really hope it will not be Godzilla, I think it would be lame to have all that hype and mystery only to end up being "Godzilla 2 the movie" >.>

WolfDemon Dec 15, 2007 01:05 AM

This movie looks like it's gonna be the shit. It great to see that the whole thing is indeed filmed amateur-style and it wasn't just the trailer. It really makes it all seem real. With this and Dark Knight right around the corner, 2008's shaping up to be a great year for movies.

Divest Dec 15, 2007 01:56 AM

Dude that 5 minute widget is fucking crazy. Crazier than shit.

Please be Cthulhu.

Grail Dec 15, 2007 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inhert (Post 551736)
I really hope it will not be Godzilla, I think it would be lame to have all that hype and mystery only to end up being "Godzilla 2 the movie" >.>

The monster obviously has wings, from the little .gif that Divest posted.

So any fear that it's Godzilla is blown out the window.


It's been stated several times taht this monster is supposed to be original, nothing from lore or any other movies...so it should be intersting to see what exactly it is. It does seem quite reptillian, that is for sure.

jouhou Dec 15, 2007 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 551815)
The monster obviously has wings, from the little .gif that Divest posted.

So any fear that it's Godzilla is blown out the window.


It's been stated several times taht this monster is supposed to be original, nothing from lore or any other movies...so it should be intersting to see what exactly it is. It does seem quite reptillian, that is for sure.

Wings??... I don't see any wings. Perhaps you're hoping to see wing. Anyway, a more solid fact that it isn't Godzilla is that there are no spikes on the monster's back.

Sceptre X Dec 15, 2007 10:39 AM

I want to see this movie to friggin bad. I wet my pants when I saw the trailer at Beowulf.

Grail Dec 15, 2007 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jouhou (Post 551909)
Wings??... I don't see any wings. Perhaps you're hoping to see wing. Anyway, a more solid fact that it isn't Godzilla is that there are no spikes on the monster's back.

If you look at the creature's back, there are two curved apendages coming out from his back. Maybe 'wings' isn't the proper word...mainly because they are definately too small to actually have the beast fly.

guyinrubbersuit Dec 16, 2007 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nall (Post 538890)
If that's not a monster movie plot, I don't know what is! It's hard to tell exactly what it means, but a mad scientist peddling soft drinks is almost certainly involved. The special ingredient is identified as "Sea Nectar", and though it may just be a throw-away word on the site, take a look at 1-18-08.com.


So this movie is the Stuff 2?


That little animated gif is very blurry and there really isn't anything there to indicate wings. For all we know it could be a carapace of some sort. Either way I kind of hope that they don't show too much of the monster as it was pretty freaky watching that clip not knowing what was going on.

How much do you want to bet that some people will be crying 9/11 once this movie comes out?

chato Dec 16, 2007 02:39 PM

I downloaded a hd version of the PSN network. Looks really good. So far me a few friends started to criticize it already. Calling it a prequel to I am Legend XD. I was legend Well? It does =/.

Divest Dec 16, 2007 03:04 PM

It's actually Rampage, the movie adaptation.

Sorry guys, didn't mean to spoil it for you.

Grail Dec 16, 2007 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 552455)
It's actually Rampage, the movie adaptation.

Sorry guys, didn't mean to spoil it for you.

That's already been done. Godzilla vs. King Kong anyone?

Megalith Dec 16, 2007 03:57 PM

http://www.arcade-history.com/images/game/1294_1.png

Hantei Dec 16, 2007 03:59 PM

Aw man, I think Divest is right. The connections are there... Kinda wish I had known that, as it takes away the suspense now, especially if it does turn out to be fact.
  • Cloverfield is a level in the game.
  • Slusho's a drink that turned people into monsters in the game. In the trailer we see the girl changing/mutating
  • Apparently in the game 6 sodas were forgotten by the project leader, on the Slusho site it says you can't drink just 6.
YouTube - 1-18-08 (cloverfield) Rampage Theory

ctu Dec 16, 2007 04:10 PM

[QUOTE=Hantei;552481][*]Slusho's a drink that turned people into monsters in the game. In the trailer we see the girl changing/mutating
QUOTE]

Which trialer was that? I don't remember seeing it.

Hantei Dec 16, 2007 04:37 PM

It's in the new one, well not that new, that was shown during the previews to Beowulf. It's mentioned in my previous post on this page quoting Skexis' post.

Dark Nation Dec 16, 2007 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jouhou (Post 535075)
What if they don't even show the monster at all? Wouldn't that be a huge disappointment. HAHAH. But this reminds me of American Godzilla (GINO). Everyone was so hyped to see how he looked since he wasn't shown in the trailers but a lot of people were disappointed. But this is a bit different, there's no name for the monster so there's no way for anyone to anticipate what kind of monster it'll be.

There's a big difference:

First, we KNEW it was Godzilla, we just didn't get an idea of how it would be until the movie came out. The marketing, if you might remember, was focused on how big it was in real life (Such as hoisting up a picture of its eye however many stories high in NYC), where as in this movie, we don't even have any conclusive idea of WHAT it is.

Only things we know so far for sure:
1. Its big
2. Its Powerful
3. Its Alive (:tpg:)

I am really looking forward to this next month. While I really hope it would be Cthulhu, its probably not going to be based on anything in existing media, as J.J.Abrams did say he wanted something original. I wanna know more secrets and tidbits, but at the same time, I kinda wanna go into the movie not knowing anything else.

Grail Dec 16, 2007 07:05 PM

Now that I think about it, it's just going to be a live action, CG Barney episode.

Big purple dinosaur ftl :(

Nall Dec 16, 2007 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by guyinrubbersuit
So this movie is the Stuff 2?

This January... get ready for stuff.

"Oh my God... It's... it's..!"

"What? What is it!?"

"STUFF!"

"Wrong... it's MORE STUFF! More than last time!!"

"But I thought we destroyed all that stuff!"

"No... this is different. Different stuff."

"Oh m-aggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!"

1-18-08 - Stuff 2: Stuff Happens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest
It's actually Rampage, the movie adaptation.

Sorry guys, didn't mean to spoil it for you.

That'd be pretty awesome actually. So I guess the monster is Lizzy? Can't be George or Ralph, not hairy enough. And there has to be a scene where it punches through a building, eats a cactus, and spits it out comically.

Dark Nation Dec 16, 2007 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nall (Post 552582)
This January... get ready for stuff.

"Oh my God... It's... it's..!"

"What? What is it!?"

"STUFF!"

"Wrong... it's MORE STUFF! More than last time!!"

"But I thought we destroyed all that stuff!"

"No... this is different. Different stuff."

"Oh m-aggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!"

1-18-08 - Stuff 2: Stuff Happens.

YouTube Video

Dagobert Dec 17, 2007 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 551580)
I don't know if you guys know this but you can watch the first five minutes of the movie here.

Also, this image has been cleaned up a bit and here's what became of it:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...5850829105.gif

It definitely looks like some sort of Godzilla-esque creature going there.

Thats a Brumak, or even General RAAM.

kainlightwind Dec 17, 2007 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 551580)
I don't know if you guys know this but you can watch the first five minutes of the movie here.

Also, this image has been cleaned up a bit and here's what became of it:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...5850829105.gif

It definitely looks like some sort of Godzilla-esque creature going there.

Yeah. You can see the two hind legs there for sure. A sucked in stomach and the lower chest area of whatever it is. Perhaps a fin on its back as well. Crazy. Thanks for the clean to whoever did that.

Shenlon Dec 17, 2007 09:22 PM

it looks like a giant mutated frog because of the legs.
I liked the movie The Host because it brought the monster genre into the new times sorta speak so I can't wait to see this movie especially because of the concept of the video camera

Divest Dec 18, 2007 10:05 AM

I don't know, I watched the five minute reel and my eyes were hurting from all the shaky camera motions. One thing I liked is how it's still kind of filmed like they're filming a normal movie at times. It just kind of seemed like the dude behind the camera was barely there.

chaofan Dec 18, 2007 12:18 PM

LOL I don't know why, but that GIF reminded me of this ol' scene :tpg:

As for the actual movie, I'm hyped for it. Monster movies need to make a comeback ever since they "retired" Godzilla. Perhaps Cloverfield goes beyond the monster as well, with people being "infected" by a certain disease or virus (ala the shadow "monster pops out of woman" scene)?

Can't wait. And its coming out in Australia the same time US does :D!

Divest Dec 19, 2007 05:10 PM

I found an image online that's supposedly the Cloverfield monster.

http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g2...se/monster.jpg

How trustworthy are the sources? Not very but it's a neat picture never the less.

ALSO: Cloverfield confirmed to be a PG-13 movie.

*sigh*

Megalith Dec 19, 2007 05:18 PM

So it's a stupid whale/penguin hybrid. How is this supposed to be scary.

I'll be in Chinatown eating a bowl of noodles while this idiot invades.

Divest Dec 19, 2007 05:19 PM

Invades in a PG-13 style, mind you.

Nall Dec 21, 2007 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 554354)
I found an image online that's supposedly the Cloverfield monster.

http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g2...se/monster.jpg

How trustworthy are the sources? Not very but it's a neat picture never the less.

ALSO: Cloverfield confirmed to be a PG-13 movie.

*sigh*

IESB says the monster pic is fake, with Paramount backing them up. Apparently it came from this guy's blog. I agree, still a very convincing piece of fanart, though.

AtomicDuck Dec 21, 2007 12:26 AM

I thought the trailer was very intriguing and loved the camera style. Everything seemed to combine to give it a much more mysterious, frightened, and urgent feel than other monster movies, a stronger feeling that you're actually there in the city with this whatever it is lurking around. I don't usually get hyped for what looks like a monster flick, but I can't wait for this one.
And I don't think that can be the monster. It's been a few months since I've seen it, but I think someone in the trailer said the monster looked like a lion.

kainlightwind Dec 21, 2007 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AtomicDuck (Post 555128)
I thought the trailer was very intriguing and loved the camera style. Everything seemed to combine to give it a much more mysterious, frightened, and urgent feel than other monster movies, a stronger feeling that you're actually there in the city with this whatever it is lurking around. I don't usually get hyped for what looks like a monster flick, but I can't wait for this one.
And I don't think that can be the monster. It's been a few months since I've seen it, but I think someone in the trailer said the monster looked like a lion.

"It's alive!" is the exact quote. So no. It's not Voltron ;)

Kilroy Dec 21, 2007 04:44 AM

I've been following the discussion on Unfiction, and it seems like there's some connection between Slusho! (a japanese energy drink), something drilled out of the seabed (Sea bed Nector, I think it's called) and the monster. However, I don't think we'll get comprehensive explanation in the movie...

Divest Dec 21, 2007 11:05 AM

Yeah we covered that a couple pages back.

jouhou Dec 21, 2007 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 554354)
I found an image online that's supposedly the Cloverfield monster.

http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g2...se/monster.jpg

How trustworthy are the sources? Not very but it's a neat picture never the less.

ALSO: Cloverfield confirmed to be a PG-13 movie.

*sigh*

Who ever drew this just copied Sin from the video game "Final Fantasy X". But it's fake anyway.

http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/4092/ffxsinfe1.jpg

Django! Dec 21, 2007 02:56 PM

I was pretty excited for this movie when the internet theorized it was a Cthulu flick.

Now? Not so much.

Grail Dec 21, 2007 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Django! (Post 555378)
I was pretty excited for this movie when the internet theorized it was a Cthulu flick.

Now? Not so much.

Okay who here honestly believes anyone will be able to make a DECENT Cthulu movie?

I hate to say it, but all of the movies based of Lovecraft stuff...have been utterly fucking terrible.

Prove me wrong.

Divest Dec 21, 2007 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Django! (Post 555378)
I was pretty excited for this movie when the internet theorized it was a Cthulu flick.

Now? Not so much.

Yeah, I know. I'm not sure if they know how much more umphf they could pack into this movie if it was about Cthulhu. The people who know who he is would pack in to see it and those who didn't would see it as just another monster movie anyways.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 555401)
Okay who here honestly believes anyone will be able to make a DECENT Cthulu movie?

I hate to say it, but all of the movies based of Lovecraft stuff...have been utterly fucking terrible.

Prove me wrong.

I don't know. With CG animation the way it is today, I think they could pull it off. Besides, the last Cthulhu movie was like 60 years ago, ya?

Dark Nation Dec 21, 2007 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 555401)
I hate to say it, but all of the movies based of Lovecraft stuff...have been utterly fucking terrible.

Prove me wrong.

I didn't know there was a SINGLE movie based on Lovecraft mythos.

Oh and on that (now fake) picture showing the monster, I also remebering seeing a line-up of various mutations or growth stages of the Metroid from the Metroid Series, and it looked very similar. I can't find the pic though, maybe someone else can?

Grail Dec 21, 2007 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Nation (Post 555435)
I didn't know there was a SINGLE movie based on Lovecraft mythos.


Trust me, the acting alone deserves it's own Lovecraft story. It's fucking scarier than the content it's trying to portray.

Django! Dec 21, 2007 04:50 PM

Quote:

Okay who here honestly believes anyone will be able to make a DECENT Cthulu movie?
Depends on what your favorite Cthulu mythos stories are. Personally, I really love the ones that have the big reveal at the end. I think one is Mountains of Madness where the guy goes to visit a friend who has found mysterious artifacts and fends off alien creatures every night. Eventually, the guy makes it there and the story climaxes at the end when you find out that his friend, who was "sick" and sleeping in the recliner, was just a body.

That, or the one where the reanimated guy who died in a boxing match comes back and kills a kid and you don't find out till the end.

But now I'm off on another tangent.

Quote:

Oh and on that (now fake) picture showing the monster,
So it's been debunked, huh? Man that picture made me happy.

Quote:

Prove me wrong.
The old silent film was pretty good.

I know Christopher Lee was in one, but dunno if it's any good.

EDIT

Shitty thing is, I can think of several movies based on Lovecraft stories, but none of them share the same ambience/mood.

Divest Dec 21, 2007 05:10 PM

Yeah, that picture was pretty bad ass. I actually liked that monster just because of how err... realistic it is? I mean, it's not something unfathomable altogether. It's just a huge mutated fucking whale who's attacking all these weird looking parasites and strange looking mounds of stone.

FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD *CHOMP*

Dark Nation Dec 21, 2007 06:09 PM

Now that you mention it, the whole thing ALSO looked like a mutated Whale.

Grail Dec 21, 2007 07:56 PM

Are you guys that desperate to put a face onto the monster that you'll actually start believing that it looks like something that it isn't?

I mean, burn me at the stake if it does happen to be a giant, mutated whale, but seriously people...look at the .gif on the last page. That thing is way too vertical and slender to even be considered a whale...

The shoulderblades on it's back, perhaps wings or whatnot...it isn't no whale. I'm as psyched to find out what this beast is as much as the next person in this thread...but you know what, ten to one odds say that we won't even SEE the damn thing in it's full glory at all in the film. Perhaps a face, or a tail, or a leg...but never the whole thing.

Tagonist Dec 22, 2007 01:04 PM

Now who's with me that we actually won't see the monster in a clear shot AT ALL in the movie? :D

I mean... He did it with Lost just as well... *_*

Krelian Dec 22, 2007 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tagonist (Post 555781)
Now who's with me that we actually won't see the monster in a clear shot AT ALL in the movie? :D

I mean... He did it with Lost just as well... *_*

When was the last time you watched LOST? They show the damn thing every three or four episodes at least.

Dark Nation Dec 22, 2007 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 555527)
Are you guys that desperate to put a face onto the monster that you'll actually start believing that it looks like something that it isn't?

I mean, burn me at the stake if it does happen to be a giant, mutated whale, but seriously people...look at the .gif on the last page. That thing is way too vertical and slender to even be considered a whale...

The shoulderblades on it's back, perhaps wings or whatnot...it isn't no whale. I'm as psyched to find out what this beast is as much as the next person in this thread...but you know what, ten to one odds say that we won't even SEE the damn thing in it's full glory at all in the film. Perhaps a face, or a tail, or a leg...but never the whole thing.

Uh, dude... I meant the drawing. You know, the one that Divest brought up? Sheesh.

Divest Dec 24, 2007 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tagonist (Post 555781)
Now who's with me that we actually won't see the monster in a clear shot AT ALL in the movie?

Nobody if they know what's good for them. Abrams already stated there's some "up close and personal" moments with the monster where we're going to get a clear view of it.

Divest Jan 2, 2008 05:36 PM

Alright so this is coming out in 10 days. Who else is excited as heck?

Does anyone know if they're going to be releasing it at midnight?

Congle line of abuse. Or is that conga-line. Or congaline. Jan 2, 2008 05:46 PM

OH, I can't believe I forgot it was January =o

I've been following this movie intently for a while now, up until they officially named the movie Cloverfield. I can't wait.

Divest Jan 2, 2008 06:15 PM

Wait, sorry, it's coming out in 16 days, which is more than two weeks away. *sigh*

For some reason I tricked myself into believing it was coming out on the 12th. =/

guyinrubbersuit Jan 2, 2008 07:31 PM

I'm still anticipating this movie but the hairs on the back of my neck are suggesting that it's going to have a great build up but a horrible climax. I certainly hope that my instinct is wrong and that it turns out great all around.

Dark Nation Jan 2, 2008 08:37 PM

Wow, its so close now. I can hardly wait!

As an added bonus, there's going to be a teaser trailer for the new Star Trek movie that's going to be shown exclusively before Cloverfield.

Source: Star Trek Teaser Trailer Debuting with Cloverfield

Quote:

"Way back, J.J. was like 'When Cloverfield comes out, Star Trek will be on it,'" Reeves said of his mysterious monster flick, which will hit theaters on 1.18.08 with the Star Trek trailer attached. "I was like 'That's a terrific idea; that's exciting'. So, I've known for a long, long, time that was their plan, and I've just recently seen bits of the teaser. I think it's amazing, and it looks pretty incredible."

"I think people are going to be very excited," he said, offering a sneak preview. "It's a teaser, you know, it's a teaser trailer. But still, I was like 'Wow!' Just the scope of it, the scale of it, you just look at it and it's so elegantly done."
Additional sources: TrekWeb.com - Star Trek Teaser Trailer Attached to J.J. Abrams Cloverfield Movie Coming January 2008
Star Trek Teaser Excites Cloverfield Director

kainlightwind Jan 2, 2008 10:07 PM

Opening day for me! Teaser and damn fine looking movie. What a damn good way to start 2008.

Zephos Jan 3, 2008 03:28 AM

Damn right!


I'll be very interested to see the ST teaser. I have no idea what the new vision will look like at all, having only seen one blurred pic of Kirk and the two teaser posters.

Sian Jan 3, 2008 12:26 PM

Is this the one filmed with the home camera? I saw it yesterday before I Am Legend (probably due to a later UK release date). I was very very impressed by it, I love films that have that sense of realism whilst still being formalistic.

Divest Jan 3, 2008 12:52 PM

Yeah, this is definitely one of those movies. The camera seems realistic but at the same time it's still steady enough to where you don't get a headache.

Sian Jan 4, 2008 08:24 PM

And it's grainy enough to make special effects not look like shit either. Can't wait to see this.

dagget Jan 5, 2008 06:50 AM

Wish I hadn't moved.. was planning on seeing this with Willow way back in July when we saw Harry Potter. :| It's still looking interesting each and every time I see a spot on TV.

As far as the ST trailer goes, it seems cool that they're releasing the trailer with this movie instead of before Indy 4... however, I'd be more excited for it if Lucas/Speilberg would already release the damn Indy 4 trailer instead of crying about how everyone hates the movie already.

Divest Jan 8, 2008 12:10 PM

I think the Cloverfield monster has pretty much been revealed. I really hope this isn't it but it looks like the monster from the trailer.


Majin yami Jan 8, 2008 12:39 PM

Christ, I didn't realise it was coming out so early. Is it a global release date or do us in ol' Blighty have to wait longer to see it?

Grail Jan 8, 2008 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 564106)
I think the Cloverfield monster has pretty much been revealed. I really hope this isn't it but it looks like the monster from the trailer.

I think that's a big negative on that image there Divest. A few pages back you posted a .gif of that cleaned up image from the trailer of the beast. I can't see it cause the bandwith was exceeded, but I distinctly remember that the beast had a completely different body structure than what that picture had.

Whereas the thing above seems like a hunchback of sorts, the beast in the .gif was more upright, meaning the head I believe was held up higher than what its back would be.

Still, awesome image :tpg:

Edit: Now that I think about it, the image leads me to believe that the creature would have a HELL of a time throwing anything with the way it's arms are structured. Just my two cents though >.> so who knows.

Divest Jan 8, 2008 01:55 PM

Yeah, I posted the cleaned up image. ;___;

I don't know where to get it from to repost it but eh.

I figured that was the reason it looked like the monster.

Grail Jan 8, 2008 02:11 PM

Have any of you seen the new image at 1-18-08.com and the new videos that have come out in 3 different languages?

It all involves some oil drilling structure out in the atlantic becoming totally and completely destroyed/submerged under the water, and the footage is of it's destruction.

At the end of the english news report it shows footage from a bunch of people inside a lifeboat getting away from the collapsing rig...and as soon as the entire thing falls underwater, a few seconds later, several HUGE peices of debris shoot up out of the water and easily fly 100-200 feet into the air.

This beasite is big, this beastie is powerful, and from that image you linked Divest, it seems kinda too rhinoish ;____;

JasonTerminator Jan 8, 2008 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Nation (Post 555435)
I didn't know there was a SINGLE movie based on Lovecraft mythos.

Re-Animator comes to mind.

No. Hard Pass. Jan 8, 2008 03:46 PM

It's Lavos. Why are we even still discussing this?

Rotorblade Jan 8, 2008 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 564106)
I think the Cloverfield monster has pretty much been revealed. I really hope this isn't it but it looks like the monster from the trailer.

That's not the creature.

Cloverfield Monster Revealed? NOPE! | /Film

Concept art from a video game the designer is working on and posted up on his portfolio.

Divest Jan 8, 2008 04:28 PM

Thank God.

I really didn't want it spoiled for me, you know?

Sian Jan 9, 2008 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grail (Post 564155)
Have any of you seen the new image at 1-18-08.com and the new videos that have come out in 3 different languages?

It all involves some oil drilling structure out in the atlantic becoming totally and completely destroyed/submerged under the water, and the footage is of it's destruction.

At the end of the english news report it shows footage from a bunch of people inside a lifeboat getting away from the collapsing rig...and as soon as the entire thing falls underwater, a few seconds later, several HUGE peices of debris shoot up out of the water and easily fly 100-200 feet into the air.

This beasite is big, this beastie is powerful, and from that image you linked Divest, it seems kinda too rhinoish ;____;

I saw that clip just then, I really wanna see this film =o

Divest Jan 9, 2008 11:26 AM

Oh man, as the day gets closer I'm freaking DYING to see this movie. I'm definitely going to be there at midnight when this whole thing releases because by god this movie has to be good.

I read the site about the possible Cloverfield monster, Grawl, and he even says, he suspects it looks pretty close to that. That might not be it, but I would go so far as to say, we probably wouldn't even be able to tell the difference.

I just wish the monster wasn't a reptile. ;___; I really wish it was that huge sin looking thing.

Dark Nation Jan 9, 2008 12:06 PM

There's talk at my work about everyone going as a group on Friday to see the movie, so I might do that :3: If I do, I'll be sure to post a spoiler-free quick review on how the movie was for the thread.

Divest Jan 10, 2008 11:06 AM

8 DAYS GUYS. 8 DAYS.

Nall Jan 10, 2008 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denicalis (Post 564196)
It's Lavos. Why are we even still discussing this?

It's Lavos nine years too late. Looks like his arrival wasn't stopped after all, just delayed.

BUT THE FUTURE REFUSED TO CHANGE, IT JUST GOT LAZY.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest
8 DAYS GUYS. 8 DAYS.

I know where I'm gonna be next Friday!

Megalith Jan 10, 2008 04:55 PM

I'll just grab the screener.

Based on the conditions of my theater's sound set-up, it'll probably sound better on my stereo monitors.

Divest Jan 10, 2008 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nall (Post 565380)
I know where I'm gonna be next Friday!

I know, I'm stoked!

This is just going to be an overall good day for me considering I'm going on a double date to see this movie. I swear I'm going to be like a child in line. Our theatre is usually packed too, which usually means a funner time. I won't feel like a jack ass when I start cheering, for example.

superpaco Jan 11, 2008 02:05 AM

They prescreened Cloverfield on my campus tonight. It was more or less a secret, and even then about twice as many people showed up as the auditorium would hold.

Spoiler:
Anyway, it's a very good movie in terms of cinematography and keeping a solid sense of tension, but the storyline gets a little stupid, as it revolves around one of the characters going back into the chaos to try to save his girlfriend, and his friends follow him.

The monster itself reminded me of what would happen if you combined a Predator, one of those tripod things from Half-Life 2, and a Licker from Resident Evil. It also has little mini-monsters that drop off of it, which resemble the bugs from Starship Troopers.

Also, if you easily get motion sickness, keep that in mind before you see this movie. I rarely get motion sick and there were at least a few times the shaking camera made me dizzy.

But yeah, it's a pretty intense and engaging movie for the most part, but has a pretty unsatisfying ending and at least 2 major WTF moments.

I won't ruin it, though. Still definitely worth a watch, even if it's just for the spectacle. I can imagine it would be less exciting on a smaller screen. We had to watch it via a classroom projector on a screen about 3/4 the size of a normal movie screen, and even then it was impressive.

Megalith Jan 11, 2008 02:06 AM

It isn't a particular concern of mine, but thank you very much for using spoiler tags.

So you are telling me that the monster is essentially one of those things from War of the Worlds, but with the Predator's head and a really long tongue?

I'll wait for the screener.

Congle line of abuse. Or is that conga-line. Or congaline. Jan 11, 2008 02:09 AM

Hmm, and I thought the monster was the biggest part of the secret. Thanks for spillin the beans!

Grail Jan 11, 2008 02:14 AM

You know, with a closely kept movie such as this one...I'd be surprised if Abrams actually ALLOWED screeners to be seen.

That's just my thought on that whole spoiler issue above.

Divest Jan 11, 2008 11:20 AM

Hm. I'm not sure if I even believe the spoilers dude but assuming it is true, Megalith needs to shut the fuck up or use spoiler tags.

Grail Jan 11, 2008 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 565849)
Hm. I'm not sure if I even believe the spoilers dude but assuming it is true, Megalith needs to shut the fuck up or use spoiler tags.

In megalith's defense, the above user above him didn't use spoiler's at all when he let loose with his big ol' campus review of the movie.

Dr. Uzuki edited that post and put spoiler tags in for the tard. As to why he didn't edit Megalith's post in the same manor is beyond me, but that's why Megalith didn't use spoilers.

Divest Jan 11, 2008 03:27 PM

Oh okay. My mistake, I wasn't aware of that.

Grail Jan 11, 2008 04:25 PM

Also, to further discredit the spoiler guy above and megalith (even though he was just posing a question), the newest clip out on television of Cloverfield is only about nine seconds long.

Seven seconds into it you hear the monster roaring, the military shooting at it, and a large ammount of smoke. It is VERY possible, if you loop that short segment again and again like I did, to see that the monster has a very, VERY huge arms, and several tentacles on it's body someplace. So it still is up in the air about what it -could- be.

And shame on you Divest. You should know that it wouldn't be a tripod or anything like that from that .gif you posted :P The monster is BULKY.

superpaco Jan 12, 2008 10:07 PM

Sorry about not using spoiler tags, I haven't been on these or any other forums in a while and I'm just getting back into the swing of things. I kinda forgot spoiler tags even existed. So, here goes a further explaination:

Spoiler:

What the monster looks like is neither important to the story or really that particularly interesting. It doesn't look like the things from War of the Worlds at all, I just mentioned the Half-Life 2 tripods because it has 2 really long, thin arms that bend at a weird angle, and gecko-ish hands. You rarely get a decent look at the thing, and I don't think its whole body is ever onscreen at once. For a while I thought it had no legs and was dragging itself along on its arms, but I'm fairly certain it was walking in the beginning, and I think it may have just been worn down by the military barrage. I'd say it more closely resembles the Lickers from Resident Evil 2 than anything else, and I mentioned the Predator because its face looked like it had a multi-segmented jaw. Otherwise it's a completely original design, so even I still have no idea what it actually was. It was just a big monster, apparently from the sea. I guess to prove that I actually saw it, I'll say that it had red things on the side of its head that puffed outwards like a frog's throat, though you don't get a good look at that until late in the movie.

But yeah, the monster isn't all that awesome looking, nor is the story very original. The movie relies entirely on its style of filming to be interesting, and it's something it pulls off incredibly well. If you're hoping to find out what the monster is, you're going to be disappointed - the entire movie is just the camera tape, aside from a brief intro detailing where the tape was found and the fact that its codename is 'Cloverfield'. The movie ends when the tape ends.

It's more or less every single giant monster movie you've ever seen, but from the perspective of the people experiencing it and not like...the military or scientists trying to find a way to stop it. Instead of cheering on the people trying to stop the monster, you feel as scared and helpless as the characters.

I guess what I'm saying is it's impossible to 'spoil' it since there's nothing much to spoil. The movie's value is in the experience of watching it and almost feeling like you're there with the characters. Even if I wrote out every plot detail for you, it wouldn't ruin the movie at all. It sounds cliché, but the movie is a rollercoaster ride.


So there. It's definitely, definitely, definitely worth seeing on the big screen. Unless you have an ultra-high quality screener and a kick-ass home theater, the impact of the movie will probably be lost on you.

Also, people seem to think I'm bullshitting them, but the movie has screened in a ton of cities already, starting on the 10th. My school gets advance screenings pretty frequently, and it screened at a bunch of colleges around the country, but I guess they requested it not be widely publicized. I only knew it was coming to my school because a friend was managing the event. Also, you're likely not going to see any leaks anytime soon, since security was insane. We all got swept by metal detectors and everyone's cellphones were confiscated, regardless of whether or not they had cameras on them (we got tickets to reclaim them after the show). There were security guards in the show, too, and it looked like they had nightvision goggles. It was pretty weird.

Kilroy Jan 13, 2008 03:50 AM

This should be a concept picture of the thing:
Spoiler:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...field4flat.jpg
The face should be more humanoid, the back smoother and the tail stiffer. But according to people having watched the movie, this should be it.

Grail Jan 13, 2008 04:07 AM

I hate to say this, and what really bothers me is that I don't think STILL the concept art or super paco's discription can be right on par with each other.

I mean...ugh...it just doens't seem right, especially from that .gif that we've all seen. it DOESN'T.

superpaco Jan 13, 2008 05:22 PM

Spoiler:
The concept art is pretty close, though it definitely had a neck. The colors are about right, and the limbs are somewhat similar. If this is official concept art, it was probably an early draft or something.

Megalith Jan 13, 2008 08:26 PM

Damn that's stupid.

Isn't that one of those monsters you encounter in a Final Fantasy game, and you kill in one hit?

Divest Jan 15, 2008 12:12 PM

Christ Megalith, you're useless. Get the fuck out of the thread, seriously.

Also, in regards to the latest concept art, I agree with Grail. I don't think that's the monster at all. Especially with the way the claws are shaped. That just doesn't look like it could launch a head across the city. I just...

Pretty much the same thing Grail said. The animated image just doesn't match up with the latest pictures. I can't wait to see what the monster really looks like.

Also, I'm not going to see the midnight screening due to having work early the next day so I'm not going to come back in this thread for a good day or so (Thursday-until I see it). I don't trust people enough to use spoiler tags. Even if they did I wouldn't trust myself enough to NOT open them.

Edit:

Why does that monster have a ballsack on its left cheek?

Kilroy Jan 16, 2008 07:25 AM

It's not a ballsack. If reports are correct, those bags deflate and inflate as the creature breathes. Cool, I think.

And here's a picture drawn by someone who claims to've seen the movie.
Click me, if you really want to....

dusk Jan 16, 2008 12:33 PM

Hmm.

Spoiler:
In the top sketch, he has 4 big legs, but in the bottom sketch, he has 6, and his neck is more extended. Also, the sketch doesn't show the 'air sacs' on the side of its neck like paco mentioned. Although, it does look similar to the 'concept art' posted earlier.

Divest Jan 16, 2008 01:04 PM

See, that's what I'm saying. I no longer believe any of these pictures anymore. None of these are even remotely close to each other.

Kilroy Jan 16, 2008 01:36 PM

The first picture I posted was a concept drawing.
Spoiler:
And according to the same people who describe the monster, you never see it completely. You see the head clearly in one scene, a leg perhaps in another...

I'm not defending the drawings or stuff, mind you. Perhaps playing the Devil's Advocate a bit, but nothing else.
I actually believe these pictures, and if they are wrong... Well, then the movie gets more enjoyable for me.

Divest Jan 16, 2008 05:03 PM

Actually, the more I think about it, the more I believe SuperPaco. =(

Kilroy Jan 17, 2008 04:19 AM

This is it, gentlemen. A picture of the monster's head, taken with a mobile phone in a New Zealandish cinema.
http://i13.tinypic.com/6wpalx5.jpg

Grail Jan 17, 2008 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 569005)
This is it, gentlemen. A picture of the monster's head, taken with a mobile phone in a New Zealandish cinema.
http://i13.tinypic.com/6wpalx5.jpg

If this is true, then the beast that we saw in the trailers, specifically in the .gif a few pages back is a complete sham.

that thing looks like, well, Swamp Thing :( I hope this is a joke.

Lizardcommando Jan 17, 2008 06:06 AM

Spoiler:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 569005)
This is it, gentlemen. A picture of the monster's head, taken with a mobile phone in a New Zealandish cinema.
http://i13.tinypic.com/6wpalx5.jpg

That looks a bit like a Doom 3 Imp.

Kilroy Jan 17, 2008 08:35 AM

Animated gif of the thing:
Spoiler:
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8...allslowhu0.gif
From
Spoiler:
Just before the monster eats Hud (the camera man)

kainlightwind Jan 17, 2008 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 569049)
Animated gif of the thing:
Spoiler:
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8...allslowhu0.gif
From
Spoiler:
Just before the monster eats Hud (the camera man)



......................................-dies-

Divest Jan 17, 2008 10:37 AM

TRYING SO HARD NOT TO LOOK

kainlightwind Jan 17, 2008 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 569084)
TRYING SO HARD NOT TO LOOK


Don't do eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!

Divest Jan 17, 2008 12:31 PM

I won't! I only have one more day.

Tomorrow I'm avoiding this thread altogether and NOT OPENING ANY PMs FROM ANYBODY.

dusk Jan 17, 2008 01:19 PM

Spoiler:
In response to the gif just posted:
1. That creature looks way too mobile for something that's supposed to be huge.
2. Why would it go through the effort of eating one little camera man?
3. Maybe it's one of the creature's spawns? Like something that grew from someone, like we saw that 'expanding' girl in the trailer.


Or, or or or or or.... I could just fucking wait for the movie to come out already. :\

Krelian Jan 17, 2008 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Divest (Post 569114)
I won't! I only have one more day.

Tomorrow I'm avoiding this thread altogether and NOT OPENING ANY PMs FROM ANYBODY.

http://g.photos.cx/emot-tinfoil-25c.gif

I have a feeling that UK residents will have no fun at all watching this. Fucking internet.

Dark Nation Jan 17, 2008 02:35 PM

Oh man, I am SO tempted to go straight to the theater from work, but I'll probably go tomorrow night. I guess I'll try and post on my reactions (Spoiler free if possible, or not, depending...) after I see the movie.

Grail Jan 17, 2008 03:10 PM

I agree with you 100% dusk.

Spoiler:
Once again I'm going with the whole idea that the monster in that .gif is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too sleek and mobile for it to be the monster we've seen in the trailers.

Also, GG with the awesome lighting going on in that .gif. From what I'm to understand this all takes place at night, and from the way it looks, that monster is in the bright of day light.


So all in all, I think it was just a very excellent made .gif capitalizing on the hype of what a few random drawings were. I still firmly believe THAT is not the monster, too many errors in the .gif.

Edit: Oh and for something that is suppose to be that HUGE that .gif makes it look pretty
Spoiler:
Tiny

Divest Jan 17, 2008 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Nation (Post 569180)
Oh man, I am SO tempted to go straight to the theater from work, but I'll probably go tomorrow night. I guess I'll try and post on my reactions (Spoiler free if possible, or not, depending...) after I see the movie.

I KNOW.

I would be there at midnight no questions asked if I didn't have to be at work 4 hours after the movie ended. :(

Tomorrow is definitely going to be worth it though. This is going to be the first movie I've ever seen on an IMAX screen.

superpaco Jan 17, 2008 05:30 PM

Superspoilerforcego
 
Spoiler:
Hate to burst your bubble, doubters, but the .gif kainlightwind posted is straight from the movie. That's what the monster looks like, and you can see the puffy red things on the side of its head that I talked about before. That's the first time you get a good look at the monster head on. It just looks weird because the contrast is a bit off since it's from a cam shot in a movie theater.

Also, you're wondering why the monster would bother eating the cameraman? It's because it's a giant monster movie that wants to scare the crap out of you, that's why. If you're looking for deep reasons for the events in the movie, you're going to be disappointed. Also, me and several of my friends felt the movie did a poor job of maintaining a constant size for the monster. Sometimes it looked like it was the size of a building, other times the size of a bus. The movie is pure entertainment, so just enjoy it.

Lizardcommando Jan 17, 2008 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy (Post 569049)
Animated gif of the thing:
Spoiler:
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/8...allslowhu0.gif
From
Spoiler:
Just before the monster eats Hud (the camera man)

Spoiler:
Now it looks like a Doom 3 imp with the head of that Kamen Rider guy, except the helmet is alive or something:|


I don't care about spoilers anymore. I don't have anyone to watch the movie with and I won't even have time to watch it. :(

Divest Feb 19, 2008 01:20 PM

I thought it was kind of funny that just a couple weeks after opening, Cloverfield pretty much died.

I know I pretty much lost a lot of interest once I saw the actual movie. It was a kick ass movie for sure but now that the mystery and hype is over, it's exposed for what it is: just an entertaining, very well made, cleverly marketed movie... with a SEQUEL coming out. Christ, can't they ever leave well enough alone?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.