Batman: Burton vs. Nolan
 

I know that many people liked Batman Begins, but how many people would actually place it above the Burton films.

I just finished watching Batman Begins again, and it is becoming less and less enjoyable. The essence of Batman was captured very accurately in Nolan's version, but I felt that the editing was very poor. A lot of people seemed to complain about the quick cuts during the fight scenes, but I think that problem was present throughout the entirety of the film. Most scenes felt like they were cut too short, and the film just didn't seem to flow well.

Burton's films were much more comic-like, but I felt that they were better films in general.

I do love the camp of the older films, up to a point (i.e. the first one, Returns and Tommy Lee Jones & Jim Carrey in Forever) but I never remember being totally satisfied with them on an emotional level.

Nolan's vision of Batman first as a conflicted and then as a driven human being rather than as a (natch) comic book character will always be the better of the two worlds, to me.

I preferred the Nolan take on Batman myself. The first two movies are great and fun films to watch without a doubt, but like Skexis i'm not too keen on campy situations. If you've ever seen the 60s TV series, you'd soon see why. It's farcial and ridiculous like the Benny Hill show. And the nipples-and-neon era, well, the less said about that, the better.

I always felt that Batman was a serious, brooding and troubled character and I think Nolan really portrays that better than in any previous Batman film. Planting him firmly in the "real" world as rendered by Nolan makes him more believable and therefore enjoyable, since Batman is basically just a vigilante and not a guy with totally implausible powers.

Er...he makes him a ninja. Not to say that's implausible, but how many guys do you know who can disappear in the blink of an eye?

But ninjas are awesome, and so is Batman. None of the earlier films really stuck with me, and it wasn't until the Animated Series and Justice League that I finally started to see Batman as a cool character.

The thing that's surprising about Burton and Nolan's versions of Batman isn't how different they are; it's how similar they are. Both go for gritty realism and psychological complexity, as compared with the 1960's TV show and the Joel Schumacher episodes. Both produced highly stylized films that were in love with darkness and splashy effects.

The real difference, for me, is in who is accorded the most screen time. Burton's sympathies clearly lie with the villians; he paints them as twisted yet sympathetic outsiders with a complexity that overshadows that of the hero. Nolan is all about the hero (to the virtual exclusion of villians entirely); his Batman is the clear center of the film. Both approaches have their merits, of course.

I just with the two Batmen were in continuity with each other. I can see Nolan making a prequel, or a sequel, without having to throw out everything that the previous people had done. Hell, they're doing that with Superman, after all.

Batman Begins revived the Batman I loved. It was closer to the way the Animated Series portrayed him.

Not to say I didn't like the first two (Burton) Batman films, but they're just completely different takes on the story. Plus, BB starts from the very beginning, whereas the original movies just threw you into the story and used assumed audience familiarity/flashbacks to fill viewers in on what happened.

Of course, I'm no Batman fangirl, so I'm sure that it's not the 100% comic-book legit origin film. But hell, it's more info than the other films. And it has Ra's al Ghul. Plus, I think Christian Bale makes a *much* better Bruce Wayne than Michael Keaton. Much better....definitely a hell of a lot sexier. I just don't know if I can handle somebody else taking on the role of the Joker, since Jack Nicholson did such a great job.

I enjoy the first two Batmans a lot, but I have to admit that Nolan did a great job with Batman Begins. I own the movie because I feel its just that great.

Burton's Batman is a decent adaptation of 40s-style Batman, but he can't direct an action scene to save his life.

Nolan's is a perfect adaptation of Miller/Loeb Batman. He just needs to pull the camera back during fight sequences.

I actully like the action scenes, they are short, no bullshit and because you dont get too see alot of Batman it keeps that mystique like "shit what's going on?".
I like the first movie but Begins is up there sniffing on it.

That was "retconned" into Bruce Wayne's past since the mid-1970s. You're a little late to complain.

Batman Begins is flawed but genius. As good as the '89 Burton movie is - it's saturated with some unnessessary shit. The Prince soundtrack is awful, The Joker as a mob boss just doesn't quite work and you can tell that Burton didn't give a shit for Returns.

I liked both Nolan's film and Burton's films. They each brought something to the table. I still like Burton's films more, though.

I appreciate Burton's vision because of his style and his effective use of pathos. I've always liked how virtually all of his movies have protagonists who are social outcasts -- dark, brooding, tortured, lonely, and extremely vulnerable. Just look at Edward in Edward Scissorhands, or Victor in The Corpse Bride. His Batman is no different.

In his two Batman films, he gave a lot of screen time to the villains. For instance, in Batman Returns, The Penguin's story took precedence over Batman's. And Burton himself acknowledged this in the special edition DVD, where he mentioned how Batman was already established and he wanted to explore The Penguin and The Catwoman.

Even his villains were vulnerable characters and outcasts. Just look at The Penguin, whose predicament wasn't entirely his fault. Had his rich parents raised him with love -- like Bruce Wayne's had -- instead of dumping him into the river, perhaps he would have turned out differently. The only difference between the infant Oswald and infant Bruce was that the former was born physically abnormal. You could argue that even if his parents had raised him properly, Oswald would still have had to endure ridicule and disdain throughout his life.

Similar pathos with Selina Kyle. You feel for Burton's villains.

Burton also uses a lot of humor, a lot of it subtle and dark. I've always loved the line from Batman Returns, where Batman and Alfred foil The Penguin's speech by turning the crowd against him, and the first thing out of The Penguin's mouth as he made haste for his exit was: "Why is there always someone who bring eggs and tomatoes to a speech."

Nolan's Batman film is just straigh-up Batman. Like orion_mk3 said, Nolan's focus (at least in Batman Begins) was clearly on presenting Batman and telling his backstory. He explored the character very well, and I enjoyed the movie thoroughly.

Nolan's Batman Begins stands on its own as a great film. It isn't as twisted, as dark, or as lonely as Burton's, but it's terrific in its own right. But maybe it's because I'm somewhat partial to Burton's work -- since I grew up watching his two Batman films countless of times. So even though I loved Batman Begins, I still would never place it above Burton's work.

I can't actually choose. It doesn't help that Burton has two excellent Batman movies for us to base our judgements on, whereas Nolan only has the one.

Begins, by far. I enjoyed Burton's Batman movies, no question, but Begins really makes you feel connected to the character in a way the others simply don't. Plus, as blasphemous as this may be to say, but I didn't even think Keaton was a good Bruce Wayne. He was an OK Batman, but as Bruce, Christian Bale destroys him.

Batman is one of my favorite comic book characters because he's so human. Spidey has radioactive powers, Superman is from another planet, but Batman is just a human with martial arts training and hi-tech gadgetry. Nolan totally nailed that in Begins.

Nolan just nailed it. Every single thing about Batman Begins was done perfectly.

I hope I'm allowed to split the movies here. Batman Begins was better than Batman Returns, but not Batman. So, if you average that out, the two directors are equal? I don't know...

I would agree with that, actually.

Christian Bale was a better Brunce Wayne than Michael Keaton was.
But Michael Keaton was a better Batman than Christian Bale was.



But -- and I'm sure this will spark some discussion:

I've always believed that Batman is the true self, while Bruce Wayne is the secret identity.

Contrast that with the Superman mythos, where Clark Kent is the true self, and Superman is the secret identity.

I appreciate the fact that Batman was represented in a more realistic and believable context, but I think it is a stupid idea to show Batman as a down-to-earth character. People love saying that they love Batman because he is just a human, but that isn't why Batman is a good character. He's a good character because he is a human that is doing extraordinary things. Nolan's Batman didn't really do anything that could send chills down my spine, but I guess that is because he was just getting started.

Although Nolan spent the entire film trying to hammer in the concept that Batman was human, it was all worthless except for the scene where Scarecrow ignites him on fire and he has to call Alfred for help. He is laying on the roof, just screwed. In this scene, Batman's vulnerability just becomes incredibly apparent, and there's no better way to imply a sense of humanity. Hiking to Mongolia or trying to get revenge for bringing a gun to court was just stupid, in contrast.

I guess that you just gotta have the camp when it comes to people who dress up in costumes.

I disagree with that, and here's why. The main reason I loved Bale's Batman over Keaton's is because he truly disguises himself. Allow me to explain.

Superheroes are supposed to mask their identity right? Keaton's Batman and Tobey Maguire's Spider Man both do one thing that throws everything off for me - They mask their appearance, but they don't mask their voice. Is your voice not a part of your identity? You can't tell me that if you knew Peter Parker and then met Spider Man, you wouldn't say "gee, he sounds alot like that Peter Parker guy."

Alot of people thought that Bale's Bat-voice was cheesy, but I thought it was downright brilliant. Even when he does the whole "SWEAR TO ME!" thing. It's corny, yeah, but that all comes full circle back to the whole fear thing. Batman's whole motif is predicated on instilling fear on those who pray on the fearful. If Batman spoke like Bruce Wayne, he wouldn't be as scary. Bale understood both Batman and Bruce Wayne. He truly masks EVERY part of his Bruce Wayne identity, right down to his voice.

That's why Bale's better ;)

I see what you mean, and I can't say I disagree. Bale distinguished the dichotomy between Batman and Bruce Wayne a lot better than Keaton. And yes, Bale's Bruce Wayne was a better disguise than Keaton's. Keaton's Bruce Wayne was very, very moody and dark ... not really that much different from his Batman.

[But Keaton had his moments too. I recall in particular moment in Batman Returns, when Batman was cruising in the Batmobile late at night, keeping an eye on The Penguin. He said to Alfred, in an extremely deep and low voice, "I think he knows who his parents are. There's something else." His Bruce Wayne never spoke like that.]

So yes, on the whole, Bale distinguished the dual identities better than Keaton did. But without that dichotomy, if I looked simply at Batman on its own, I liked Keaton's take more.

While Bale's disguising of his voice was a good concept, the execution was awful...

While the idea was that Bale's Batman would scare the thugs with his brutal monster-like voice....I indeed though the execution was indeed a bit over-the-top.
He sounded too un-Batman to me.
More like a big barking dog/bear (whatever :p) then like the mysterious and intimidating voice of Kevin Conroy (voice of Batman The Animated Series)....and Michael Keaton had that too.
Kevin Conroy might not have portrayed Batman in the live-action movies, but if you're talking about the distinction between the two voices of Batman (Bruce and Bats), then he is by far the best of any of the Batman actors!

While I loved Batman Begins, Burton's Batman movies will always be my favorites!
They're more the Batman that I've grown to love over the years and Batman Begins shows a new side of Batman which isn't entirely how I see Batman.

I agree. For me, the definitive Batman -- in terms of how he carries himself and how he speaks -- is the Animated Series' take. And Kevin Conroy just made the character true. He got it just right. When I think about how Batman and Bruce Wayne would talk, Kevin Conroy is the voice I hear.

To me, Batman Returns just edges out Batman Begins as my favorite. I just really liked the very dark atmosphere that Burton brought. It had more interesting villains in my opinion as well.

As someone mentionned earlier, Batman Begins isn't quite so good on repeated viewings, while to me at least, Burton's Batmans are just fine on repeated viewings.

Bale does a pretty solid Batman, but I wouldn't give him the crown until I see how he does in the next one.

You know, it's probably blasphemy to say this, but when it comes to Keaton vs. Bale, I really couldn't care less. Argue about the actors, argue about the directors, argue about nostaligia, even, but when it comes right down to it, Burton's Batmobile simply can't compete with Nolan's rendition.

I didn't think anyone was going to go there.

Nolan's Batmobile ... it was cool. But it wasn't subtle.

I can't picture The Dark Knight driving around in that thing, all sleek, brooding, and mysterious.

I can. He needs to fight crime by instilling fear on those who pray on the fearful. What better way than a scary, badass tank! The original batmobile is too slick and somewhat campy. The tumbler is cool AND practical.

It certainly does instill fear in his opponents.

But to me, Batman isn't about brute force. The tumber is just that: Brute force. Batman methods of instilling fear into badguys is by appearing out of the shadows. There's an element of surprise, subtlety and silent finesse.

While I do like the tank because it could do all sorts of things ... it just isn't subtle.

Christian Bale sucked. All Bale ever brings to a film is a sense of evil and arrogance.

Keaton was a better Bruce Wayne, of course. It was harder to fathom the possibility that he was Batman, both in and out of the film's context. Back when Batman came out, you'd see Keaton as a comic, since he just came out of Beetlejuice. And he always acted like an oddball in the film during public scenes, like the party at Wayne Manor in the beginning. You got the sense that he didn't belong, but you couldn't really picture the guy as Batman since he wasn't particularly dark and moody and attended to business in the real world.

Keaton is such an incredible actor. The scene in Batman Returns where the Bat Signal turns on and his face just lights up, says it all.

Keaton was a decent Bruce Wayne in the first Batman film, but in Returns he was just a by-the-numbers character, showing none of the characteristics you'd expect from Wayne.

Bale nailed him.

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...BruceWayne.jpg

I've always liked that scene. It was almost like his whole purpose in life was to wait for that signal. That's all he lived for. Sitting in a darkened room, all by himself, waiting for the signal to go up.


Keaton showing none of the characterics you'd expect from Wayne in Batman Returns?

What do you expect from Bruce Wayne? Brunce Wayne IS just a by-the-numbers character.

Batman is the true self. And Keaton's Batman is dope.

There's nothing to suggest that Wayne's a radically different person from Batman in Returns. Of course that's just one of many failings Returns has as a Batman movie.

And Keaton just looked good in the suit; he didn't bring Batman to life like Bale did.

Too bad Keaton's "I'm Batman." from the beginning of the first film destroys anything Bale did in Batman Begins.

Bale counters with "I'm Batman."!

I can't even say how much more I liked Batman Begins than any other Batman. I wouldn't trade Batman Begins not even for a hundred Keaton's Batman's.

Bayle is a much darker Batman, more stylish.
In my opinion there's no better Bruce Wayne and Batman than Christian Bayle, Michael Keaton wasn't bad but not half as good.

Batman Begins is not a good movie. I've seen it a couple of times, and I really cannot understand why there is so much praise heaped at it. The Burton Batman films easily surpass Nolan's effort.

Nolan is better suited for thrillers and gimmick movies, not action films.

Batman Begins is the obvious choice mainly because it follows his origin as depicted in the comics for the most part, some slight alterations but just about as good as it'll ever get in a Batman film. Burton's vision was stylized to a point where it got me sick, I couldn't ever figure out the use of those huge statues that appeared in Returns and so on. Also about that image of Keaton in Returns, you would think the Gotham police would've figured out where the Bat signal was being relayed to. :p
The only upside to Burton's Batman films is probably just the score, it's difficult to replace the Batman theme with the one presented by Zimmer & Newton Howard being that I grew up on Danny Elfman's Batman theme and it doesn't help that it's in the animated series as well. The new theme will take some time getting used to. :singalong:

I wholeheartedly agree with this (and what Tappy said). IMO, the animated version of Batman (BTAS, TNBA, Batman Beyond, Justice League, etc) far surpasses anything in the live-action movies. Kevin Conroy (and Bruce Timm & co.) really deserve so much more credit. As far as Batman goes, that version is it for me.

For those who might not know:
The Animated Series only used Danny Elfman's theme for the opening and end end credits.
(and it was briefly used in the episode's "The Last Laugh" and "Nothing To Fear"...if I can remember correctly)
In the series itself Batman had another rousing heroic theme, written by Shirley Walker.
(which was later also used for the opening and end credits, when it became the Batman & Robin Adventures.....or something like that, plus The Mask Of Phantasm movie opens with this theme).

How ever good Elfman's Batman theme may be, I think this theme was even better!

I believe those massive statues were meant to give a sense of oppression, and of power.

Haha, I've always wondered about that too.


-----


Tappy brought up Shirley Walker, whose work is just awesome, and who deserves a lot of recognition. She scored the Animated Series incredibly well, and she punctuated every scene perfectly.

I choose Nolan's Batman.

Batman Begins proved to be my favorite Batman movie yet. Christian Bale's performance is exactly how I imagined Bruce Wayne. Yes, Bale still needs work on his Batman 'interrogation' voice, but I believe he won't disappoint in the near future.

Nolan's Batman had more heart and I felt it respected the roots of the character more. Burton's Batman was excellent and I enjoy 'Batman' and 'Batman Returns', I just feel Nolan did a better job.

The scene pretty clearly shows extra mirrors on Wayne Manor reflecting the signal to Bruce's room; the actual signal isn't directly aimed at Wayne Manor.

Nolan's Batman Begins. Why Bale? They (fanboys) wanted a Playboy Bruce Wayne so the got Patrick Bateman (American Psycho) and they (fanboys) Batman in action so they Cleric John Preston (Equilibrium). So that is why the fanboys wants Bale ;)

But what if he has guests over. And the signal from the city goes up.

Uh oh.

I prefer Nolan's Batman over any other film version, with the exception of Mask of the Phantasm (as I'm such a whore for the 90's Animated series...). I did quite like Burton's 'Batman Returns' though, much more than the first one he did in fact.

The new Batman movie seems too dark or something. I just doesn't go well with the rest of the Batman movies that have come out so far. Besides, Batman in Burton's movies seemed cooler than Nolan's Batman.

To this day whenever I think of the Joker, his animated theme almost always follows suit.



Whenever I think of Burton's movies I remember two things: Batman strapping a bomb to a dude and pushing him down a manhole, and penguins with rockets strapped to their backs. The only bad thing I can remember about Nolan's is that stupid heat weapon.

Although Nicholson's performance as Joker will probably trump whoever Nolan gets...

Personally, I never enjoyed Burton's Bat-flicks. The first film is decent, but even when it came out I remember asking my father why Batman was mowing people down with machine guns. The second film remains unwatchable to me. At least I can laugh at Batman and Robin. I can't say the same for Returns.

Nolan's film on the other hand hit every nail squarely on the head for me. Not just in terms of the characterization, but as a cinematic experience. It's a great movie as far as I'm concerned, and I pray Superman Returns is on its level.

I have to agree though with those citing the animated series. It's so ingrained in me, Kevin Conroy and Mark Hamil are the voices I hear when I read dialogue between Batman and Joker. Mask of the Phantasm is the definitive Batman picture for me. Shirley Walker's theme from that movie also tops any other theme I've heard for the Caped Crusader.

Oooh, Burton took some flak for that one -- having Batman strapping a bomb to the tattooed strongman, and shoving into a hole. He had to explain that one on the special edition DVD of Batman Returns.



Mask of the Phantasm -- that movie is just awesome. Shirley Walker's score for it is also brilliant.

Off topic, on topic, I guess. But does anyone know if there was ever a soundtrack released with Shirley Walker's work from the regular series (i.e. not the Phantasm score)? I would personally kill for something like that which collected the Penguin, Poison Ivy, and countless other classic themes from the show.

[nolife fanboy]The tank was actually a nod to Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns.[/nolife fanboy]

Being an avid fan of the Burton movies, TAS and comic book storylines by Miller and Loeb, Nolan's take felt a little weak on the villains side and maybe the fight scenes as well. Apart from the showdown we really never get to see how mean the Bale Batman gets when roughing up thugs and I think this has some relevance for the overall characterization (and well choreographed and filmed fights are more fun anyway). The casting was very effective nonetheless so was the gradual development of all the little aspects of the mythos.

Still, Burton did those most amazing things with his villains. The madness of the Joker, the chemistry between Catwoman and Batman, along with the overall style and poetry - those things made the old movies exeptional for me. And it's not quite Burton's likeable-misfits-routine as in Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands or Corpse Bride. The Penguin was disgusting and creepy, despite all the tragedy involved.

Anyway, at the moment I'm having pretty much a hard time comparing or judging Batman Begins. It's going to be part of a series, so give me the sequels and I'll take another look at the finished product. As an exposition to a more down to earth and still serious movie version of Batman it did very good. It didn't try to emulate Burton, nor should it.

Unfortunately, there wasn't.

But Tappy ripped some himself from the show. You can find them on his FTP. Look for the following:

Tappy's Unreleased TV Music Collection Volume 1

and

Tappy's Unreleased TV Music Collection Volume 2

When they had announced that they were working on a new Batman film, way back when, I was praying for The Dark Knight Returns. That is probably the most definative Bat-story for me. He's downright brutal on the thugs he takes on, and even gets his ass handed to him by the Mutant Leader.

I knew it wouldn't come to pass because Supes is in the end of the series, as well as Green Arrow(not that big a deal, they could've used him no problem).

Then, there were those awful rumors about a Superman Vs. Batman film, where Superman was supposed to wear a battlesuit for some strange reason. I read the reviews on that script and nearly hung myself.

As for who made the better Bat-film? Personally, I love the Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker film. That was seriously twisted. But, I'm going to go with Burton's Batman, because I was about nine or ten when that came out, and I was so excited to see it. And, Michael Keaton made a great Bats..

Oh, speaking of other bat-films, one of the best is a 10 minute or so short called Batman: Dead End. I loved the fact that the Bat-suit was leather and cloth, instead of the body armor in every other movie(animated aside). And the guy who played the Joker was awesome(Boner from Growing Pains). Awesome stuff right there.

In my opinion Batman Returns is the best Batman movie ever - but maybe that´s because I´m a Burton fan, and Returns was more more burtonesque than any other Batman movie. I also love the giant statues. Well, the must be someone who loves them

Batman Begins was better than 3 and 4, very very very much better. The use of brute force was a little much, what bothers me more is the portrayal of the catastrophy the villians brought over the town. Batman VS The Zombies. ^^

Funny you should mention that..that story(in the original comics) is what made DC stop having Batman kill. Before then, he'd carry around the same kind of handgun that was used to kill his parents. But in the Zombie issue, he ended "capping alot of crowns" and the decision was made to have Batman become less violent.