Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Media Centre (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Okay, NOW Hollywood is out of ideas - Street Fighter sequel is coming (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=14165)

Wall Feces Oct 30, 2006 07:27 AM

Okay, NOW Hollywood is out of ideas - Street Fighter sequel is coming
 
http://comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=17257

Quote:

Ashok Amritraj's Hyde Park Entertainment and Capcom Ltd. are developing a new movie based on the popular videogame franchise "Street Fighter," says Variety. Screenwriter Justin Marks has been hired to adapt.

Hyde Park and Capcom -- Japanese publisher of "Street Fighter" -- will produce the film in a joint venture.

The movie will focus on the game's most popular female fighter, Chun-Li, but the exact storyline is being kept under wraps.

In 1994, Universal released a Street Fighter movie starring Jean-Claude Van Damme that featured most of the characters from the game.

Hyde Park and Capcom's film is targeted to be released in 2008, the 20th anniversary of the game franchise.

Marks just completed writing Voltran for producer Mark Gordon.
Can someone seriously tell me how this was at all a good idea? I mean honestly, I almost cried after reading this. This is such a sad sign of things to come if they're digging for VIDEO GAME FILM SEQUELS for films that were released YEARS ago, and STILL sucked ass. Ugh.

My only hope is that it's animated, but all signs point to it not being that way.

nabhan Oct 30, 2006 07:44 AM

It's not really a sequel so much as a film based off a series which already happens to have a movie based on it.

I mean, it's not like the Street Fighter universe is so narrow that they'll be the same movies or something.

Bigblah Oct 30, 2006 07:56 AM

The only way to save this movie is to cast Jacky Chan as Chun-Li.

JazzFlight Oct 30, 2006 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigblah
The only way to save this movie is to cast Jacky Chan as Chun-Li.

http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/9981/chanli1xc.jpg

Precisely. He'd be reprising his role.

Troy-Bagnell Oct 30, 2006 08:08 AM

what the heck!?
 
I actually own the street fighter movie DVD. it was $5 and worth it for the laughs. the movie is seriously one of the worst things I've ever seen. it did really poorly on sales, and the fact that it's $5 in bargain bins is not a good sign.

seriously? why do they think this is a good idea? street fighter isn't even really popular anymore. if they made this during the height of it's popularity maybe I could understand. but this is almost a decade later. I guess they couldn't do worse than the first film.

I wonder if it's going to be serious? or just completely retarded like the first one. I'll probably download it or something if it ever gets made. and that's a big if. I seriously don't see this thing getting finished. it just doesn't really make any sense...

it's hard to be a street fighter fan these days...

Cal Oct 30, 2006 08:26 AM

Samuel L Jackson as Chun-Li
William Hung as Ryu
David Cross as Ken
Tom Cruise as Sagat
Hank Azaria as Vega
An F-22 as Guile
A medicine ball with a smiley face drawn on it as Blanka

[Edit] Shinzo Abe as Dhalsim

Gecko3 Oct 30, 2006 08:34 AM

Seeing something like this is increasingly making me wish I download movies, cause I certainly wouldn't want to pay to see this (and I wish Capcom would stop whoring out their games for movies). The only possible way I may go see this is if it's animation. If it's live action, it's probably going to suck like 99.9% of all other video game-based movies.

I wonder if they're going to hire Uwe Boll to direct lol (wouldn't surprise me if he did a Ghosts N' Goblins movie).

Btw, here's Jackie Chan in a Street Fighter scene. This is a clip from the movie City Hunter, and although the rest of the movie kind of sucks, it's worth watching simply for this scene alone :D

From the link:

Quote:

Marks just completed writing Voltran for producer Mark Gordon.
I wonder if they meant 'Voltron'. You know, the old cartoon that had the 5 robotic lions fighting the forces of evil (like all 80's cartoons hehe) that could form the big robot.

nanashiusako Oct 30, 2006 09:21 AM

Hm...it can't possibly be as bad as the first one, could it? Even though I did go see the Street Fighter movie twice. It amazed me back then how much the Mortal Kombat movie destroyed this one...

Wall Feces Oct 30, 2006 09:55 AM

The only thing the original Street Fighter is good for is hearty laughs among friends because of how horrific the whole thing is, how cheesy the dialogue is, and how many times Van Damme can do a roundhouse kick. Even the drinking game (take a drink whenever Van Damme does a roundhouse kick) is flawed because he doesn't unleash anything until the very end.

It's one of the most useless movies ever made. It serves little to no purpose. Making another one is just downright puzzling.

Paco Oct 30, 2006 10:07 AM

Yeah, the first film was pretty horrid. I used to have it but when it turned up missing I really didn't shed a tear over it. I sure hope that film doesn't turn out to be this abomination like every other video game film released.

Kilroy Oct 30, 2006 10:24 AM

This sounds excellent! If Street Fighter can get a new movie, so can Super Mario Brothers! Bob Hoskins against a league of Birdos and Hammer Bros.? Best plot ever!

VitaPup Oct 30, 2006 11:33 AM

I actually am kind of amused by this. Who knows what the movie will actually be like, it may be on par with the first mortal kombat movie. One thins is for sure, it won’t be more boring than the new Superman movie.

The Wise Vivi Oct 30, 2006 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gecko3
Btw, here's Jackie Chan in a Street Fighter scene. This is a clip from the movie City Hunter, and although the rest of the movie kind of sucks, it's worth watching simply for this scene alone :D

OMG! That is hilarious. Now that is the best Street Fighter movie ever. Just like the real game!:ninja:

guyinrubbersuit Oct 30, 2006 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sprouticus
The only thing the original Street Fighter is good for is hearty laughs among friends because of how horrific the whole thing is, how cheesy the dialogue is, and how many times Van Damme can do a roundhouse kick. Even the drinking game (take a drink whenever Van Damme does a roundhouse kick) is flawed because he doesn't unleash anything until the very end.

That's why you do the drinking game based off of how many times he does the splits. He's kind of conservative in this movie with it, but watch Bloodsport and he does it at least 7 times or so.

Why is this happening? Eh whatever. By the way, City Hunter is awesome just for the fact it's a pretty slapstick martial arts comedy.

ApOcaLyPSe_1985 Oct 30, 2006 01:44 PM

Lol, I guess nobody had see this coming :P And why would Chun-Li be the most popular character? In my opion and that of many others, Ryu and Ken are still the most favored plus they are also the story's main characters. It was a suprise reading that Capcom is actually working on this... maybe it might turn out OK as long as they hire talented/convincing martial artists for this. Does Capcom have any experience in filming? I'll be more happy if they also put in many special moves because we all love yoga fire and sonic booms.

map car man words telling me to do things Oct 30, 2006 02:10 PM

See, this is all funny and amusing coming up with possible actors, but you know they're going to cast Devon Aoki as Chun-Li anyway. With possibly Tom Cruise doing a cameo as Ryu.

Daily Mail will write: "Yet another example of how shallow and juvenile the videogame media still is."

The Furious One Oct 30, 2006 03:43 PM

Man thats lame, DOA Movie was utter garbage, no they are gonna have another lame ass video game to movie. Noting beats Street Fighter Animated Movie, plot, characters, and music were awesome, only wish Fei Long & Dee Jay had a larger role.

cant post link yet *insert Chun Li shower scene here*

Jackie Chan has great legs!

JasonTerminator Oct 30, 2006 03:52 PM

As far as I can tell, the DOA movie isn't out yet, so you can't call it garbage.

Not to say that it probably isn't, but I was surprised when they delayed it to December, a sign that movie studios have faith in their product. It may surprise us.

Burp Oct 30, 2006 04:51 PM

I... dont know what to think about this, but to be honest, im now scared... very scared.

EDIT: A image comes to my mind... now that Capcom of USA got the licence of Street Fighter... OH GOD!!: STREET FIGHTER: THE MOVIE 2, THE GAME 2

Cal Oct 30, 2006 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qwarky
Daily Mail will write: "Yet another example of how shallow and juvenile the videogame media still is."

And well they ought, because the medium generally is.

Cirno Oct 30, 2006 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonTerminator
As far as I can tell, the DOA movie isn't out yet, so you can't call it garbage.

Not even pre-emptively? I mean come on, you can't tell me that looked like a good movie from the trailers (and those are usually better than the actual film itself). That and...Devon Aoki? Splinter's twin sister? Come the fuck on! I mean come on!

No. Hard Pass. Oct 30, 2006 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by some guy
Okay, NOW Hollywood is out of ideas - Street Fighter sequel is coming

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Wall Feces Oct 30, 2006 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denicalis
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

What else is the word "now" supposed to mean? What I mean by it is that when they do useless rehashes, remakes, sequels, prequels, whatever, they USUALLY have a good reason for it from a purely business standpoint. This time, NOTHING makes sense in this decision. They've truly run out of ideas if they're dipping into an unsuccessful, widely-hated and just plain retarded video game adaptation.

No. Hard Pass. Oct 30, 2006 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sprouticus
What else is the word "now" supposed to mean? What I mean by it is that when they do useless rehashes, remakes, sequels, prequels, whatever, they USUALLY have a good reason for it from a purely business standpoint. This time, NOTHING makes sense in this decision. They've truly run out of ideas if they're dipping into an unsuccessful, widely-hated and just plain retarded video game adaptation.

You know, for someone who claims to have an understanding of how Hollywood works, you're painfully unaware of one of the most famous quotes from a Hollywood cult film.

Fire On Ice Oct 30, 2006 07:41 PM

Well I hope this time around they cast people based on acting ability, not just looking like the character in question. It is possible to have both. Not particularily easy, but still possible.

Cal Oct 30, 2006 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire On Ice
Well I hope this time around they cast people based on acting ability, not just looking like the character in question. It is possible to have both. Not particularily easy, but still possible.

But this is exactly what I don't get. The story itself is fucking silly. Could you imagine an earnest Tom Hanks or Sam Neill performance in Hotshots 3?

Wall Feces Oct 30, 2006 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denicalis
You know, for someone who claims to have an understanding of how Hollywood works, you're painfully unaware of one of the most famous quotes from a Hollywood cult film.

I claim to know how to make films, not know how Hollywood works... That's something they really don't teach at my school. I'll find out on my own when I move out there.

Out of curiosity, what quote and what film do you speak of?

No. Hard Pass. Oct 30, 2006 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sprouticus
I claim to know how to make films, not know how Hollywood works... That's something they really don't teach at my school. I'll find out on my own when I move out there.

Out of curiosity, what quote and what film do you speak of?

Princess Bride. "INCONCEIVABLE!" "You know, you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

And I can only assume that means you went to a technical program, then? I strongly encourage you to take some film history courses, mate. It'll do your work a world of good.

Fire On Ice Oct 30, 2006 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal
But this is exactly what I don't get. The story itself is fucking silly. Could you imagine an earnest Tom Hanks or Sam Neill performance in Hotshots 3?

Well seriously, what are the odds that you'll get a quality story out of a video game that's based of random characters beating the shit out of each other? As far as I'm concerned, the best part of the last movie was that everybody looked like their character but the things like the fact the Guile had a heavy French accent made that kinda worthless. The acting was so bad, it almost made it painful for me to watch. The campy feel was the only reason I even finished it in the first place...well that and the final frame of the movie with the classic poses.

Jochie Oct 30, 2006 09:20 PM

We've become a mob of consumer morons, therefore we make moronic movies. Which part is difficult to understand?

Wall Feces Oct 30, 2006 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denicalis
Princess Bride. "INCONCEIVABLE!" "You know, you keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

And I can only assume that means you went to a technical program, then? I strongly encourage you to take some film history courses, mate. It'll do your work a world of good.

FUCK! OF COURSE! Although, to my defense, I haven't seen that movie in 8 years. I take a few film studies courses, but it's mostly analysis, theory, and critical study on a particular subject. I took one film history course but it was extremely broad.

No. Hard Pass. Oct 30, 2006 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sprouticus
FUCK! OF COURSE! Although, to my defense, I haven't seen that movie in 8 years. I take a few film studies courses, but it's mostly analysis, theory, and critical study on a particular subject. I took one film history course but it was extremely broad.

What school are you going to, anyway?

guyinrubbersuit Oct 30, 2006 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal
But this is exactly what I don't get. The story itself is fucking silly. Could you imagine an earnest Tom Hanks or Sam Neill performance in Hotshots 3?


Well Tom Hanks has done comedies in the past so it wouldn't be beyond him.

I kind of hope for an almost supernatural type of film, you know sort of how most Hong Kong films are with wire jumping and other death defying stunts and of course the game's trademark fireballs.

Honestly, I don't expect much in the movie except to be completely and utterly entertained by some fantastic fight choreography, with Keanu Reeves starring as Ken. I kid, I kid.

JasonTerminator Oct 31, 2006 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kurado
Not even pre-emptively? I mean come on, you can't tell me that looked like a good movie from the trailers (and those are usually better than the actual film itself). That and...Devon Aoki? Splinter's twin sister? Come the fuck on! I mean come on!

It might pull off an "awesomely bad" situation, where the movie sucks, but it's still awesome.

Like the Mario Bros movie.

TheKnightOfNee Oct 31, 2006 04:35 AM

Once this Street Fighter 2 movie comes out, they'll release it again with four new characters in a couple extra scenes as "Super Street Fighter 2", then speed up some fight scenes and release it yet again as "Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo".

Chibi Neko Oct 31, 2006 07:45 AM

Making a sequel to a movie like this is just sad....

Next they will be making a sequel to Independents day.

The Furious One Oct 31, 2006 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonTerminator
As far as I can tell, the DOA movie isn't out yet, so you can't call it garbage.

Not to say that it probably isn't, but I was surprised when they delayed it to December, a sign that movie studios have faith in their product. It may surprise us.

Huh??? We are talking about dead or alive movie, right, I've seen it, and its utter crap.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kolba
Look, we really need to get rid of the link restrictions around here, you know.

Yeh its really dumb, just more incentive to spam the boards really.

VitaminZinc Oct 31, 2006 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilroy
This sounds excellent! If Street Fighter can get a new movie, so can Super Mario Brothers! Bob Hoskins against a league of Birdos and Hammer Bros.? Best plot ever!

The only way they could make a decent Mario Bros movie is if they had Tim Burton directing, imo.

guyinrubbersuit Nov 1, 2006 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nwzinc
The only way they could make a decent Mario Bros movie is if they had Tim Burton directing, imo.


NO.

Tim Burton's visual style doesn't mesh well with Mario's universe. The only way another movie is to work is if it is completely animated, CG or traditional.

No. Hard Pass. Nov 1, 2006 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nwzinc
The only way they could make a decent Mario Bros movie is if they had Tim Burton directing, imo.

What.


WHAT?

WHAT!?

GET OUT. YOU GET THE FUCK OUT RIGHT NOW. YOU KNOW NOTHING OF FILM.

Tim Burton directing SMB? So, what? We could get Mario all pissed off at Bowser because he reminds him of an absentee father? So Johnny Depp could play Iggy Koopa, because he's all zany like that? I mean, really, what in the fuck about SMB's light, amusing tone makes you think Tim's heavy handed, father-issue bullshit would be a good fit?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.