Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Media Centre (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Overrated Movies (or "Why Does Everyone Like Tyler Durden?") (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4057)

Duo Maxwell Apr 15, 2006 06:10 PM

As far as overrated goes: I would say just about any horror movie is overrated. Then again, suspense/thrillers/horror movies never did much of anything for me to begin with. With the exception of Killer Clowns from Outer Space, not because it's actually scary, but because it's a really great comedy. Or, at least I laughed my ass off through the entire thing.

But, seriously, horror movies have never held much entertainment value for me and I can't see why anyone would really like them so much. They aren't scary, and the only ones I've ever liked are only because they're exceptionally gory or there's sort of a cool premise/character. The most recent gore-fest I enjoyed, despite the shallow plot was High Tension, but that may be just because I would have the most awesome, earth-shattering sex with the girl who plays the main character.

Freddy Krueger Apr 15, 2006 06:47 PM

I wouldn't consider horror movies overrated due to the fact it doesn't have a large fanbase compared to other genres, a strong fanbase yes but not a BIG one. A lot of people also rip on 80s horror movies "which are the best IMO".

acid Apr 16, 2006 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinkymagic
Tarintino is unbelievanly over-rated. Pretty much every character in all of his films are the same. Tarintino movies are movies for the 15 year olds. LoTR was overrated too, I got the feeling that Peter Jackson was laughing at me while I was watching. Bruce Lee films are overrated as well, give me Chan or Stephen Chow over Lee any day.

Shanghai Noon and Shaolin Soccer over Enter the Dragon? Really?

I saw I ♥ Huckabees the other night based on a reccomendation. It was the first movie in a long time that I actually fell asleep in. It seems they were far too occupied including as much existential yammering and imagery to remember to include a plot. It's as if halfway through they just decided to stop actually trying to make a movie, and just "let some stuff happen". The whole thing just screamed pretentious to me.

I mean admittedly, it was 1 AM and I was drunk so there is a good chance that I just didn't "get" it. I might one day rewatch it, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

el jacko Apr 16, 2006 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a_cid
I mean admittedly, it was 1 AM and I was drunk so there is a good chance that I just didn't "get" it. I might one day rewatch it, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

I was neither drunk nor at 1 AM when I saw it and I felt the exact same way. After I finished watching it I felt cheated because the film seemed very pretentious for many of the reasons you listed.

A film that is rather similar but much better is Me and You and Everyone We Know; similar concept but much better execution.

Dhsu Apr 16, 2006 07:10 PM

If you want an existential movie that DOESN'T suck, check out Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead.

Watching I <3 Huckabees was like seeing somebody masturbate to a LiveJournal for two hours.

Arbok Apr 17, 2006 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy-Chan
The Matrix series is pretty overrated. I work at blockbuster and I tend to like obscure movies and things that aren't so mainstream. I loved the first Matrix, but Reloaded was horrible. I think the Wachowski Brothers did an awesome job on V for Vendetta though. I have nothing against them.

Quoted for basically stating what I had intended to...

I loved the first “Matrix”, thought the concept and execution were both well done. Then Reloaded came and ruined everything to the point where I didn’t even desire to see Revolutions, and still haven’t to this day. However, likewise, I loved “V for Vendetta” and it kind of proved to me that the first Matrix wasn’t just a fluke success for the two either.

Dee Apr 20, 2006 02:04 AM

I kind of felt like Office Space was overrated. There are a lot of jokes that can be told many times (and would make me laugh), but the overall story was alright. Not the SUPER AWESOME everyone made it out to be.

Zephos Apr 20, 2006 05:08 AM

How are the last two Matrix movies overrated when no-one likes them?

DarkLink2135 Apr 20, 2006 11:51 AM

I think its safe to say Napoleon Dynamite is the most overrated movie of all time. I never understood the cult following it got. Yeah there were a couple funny moments...but seriously it really wasn't that good of a movie.

Cadenza Apr 21, 2006 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ComCrimson
Shaun of the Dead is one of the films i think was really over rated that sucked. All my friends were raving on about how hilarious it was so i thought 'Alright then, i'll have a watch of that' so i did and i was disappointed. I didn't laugh once. It was the most un-funniest thing next to The Office. It got way too much hype for what it was in my opinion

Someone with a naruto signature is going to libel The Office. doubleyou-tee-eff.

Will Apr 21, 2006 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Capo
While I'll let the 2001 comment slide, as it was a bit boring, A Clockwork Orange was one of the greatest films ever made. Just because you didn't understand it doesn't mean it was bad.

Why do people insist on doing this? I'm not surprised, as this type of respond is typical of fans of an overrated film, but it just doesn't seem like your place to question my intelligence. Ask any teacher I've ever had, I've always been the top analytical mind in my class, whatever the subject. I never said the movie was bad or poorly done (though I'm not saying that it wasn't); all I said was that it's overrated.

vuigun Apr 21, 2006 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zephos
How are the last two Matrix movies overrated when no-one likes them?

Something I've noticed over the years of hearing people judge movies is...people barely seem to know what they're talking about when they say something is over or underrated. It's just like a knee-jerk reaction.

evergreen May 3, 2006 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dhsu
If you want an existential movie that DOESN'T suck, check out Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead.

Heads. Heads. Heads.

mrman1 May 11, 2006 09:08 PM

Brokeback Mountain was overrated by the concensus of critics. Imagine an interracial hetereosexual couple. Or just a plain jane heterosexual couple. Then ask how great a "love" story it was.

Crash was overrated by critics I respect, as well as the academy. "A histrionic assemblage of contrivances and monologues that made me pine for Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing".

Equilibrium was overrated by GFF. Worse acting than the last three Star Wars movies combined, without the badass special FX.

I'll pick apart y'all lists later :)

Double Post:
Quote:

Originally Posted by JazzFlight
Pretty much anything Spielberg's done for the past 5 years.

A.I., Minority Report, The Terminal, War of the Worlds...

BLECH. He could put a still-frame image of elephant dung onscreen for an hour and a half and the critics would give him 4 stars.

(I haven't seen Munich. It looked different than the other tripe he's been doing lately, so maybe it was good.)

Munich was lesser, high-minded Speilberg (like Amistad and A.I.). Noble, but lacking the lucid intensity of Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List.

Spielberg DID have a shot of triceritops dung onscreen for a minute or so in Jurassic Park, remember? :)

In case you haven't heard, Spielberg history of popular, sentimental, and excitable filmmaking has created a backlash amongst the pointy-headed professionals of film criticism. Some defend even his worst stuff to the hilt (Armond White). Others thought even Schindler's List was kiddified.

Zephos May 12, 2006 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrman1
Brokeback Mountain was overrated by the concensus of critics. Imagine an interracial hetereosexual couple. Or just a plain jane heterosexual couple. Then ask how great a "love" story it was.

Er... That was the point of the movie. Not a gimmick. There would have been little to no dramatic conflict in the film had it been a "plain jane" hetero couple. It was the story of a forbidden love, and one that is still today often considered just that, whereas interracial relationships are generally better-received.

avanent May 12, 2006 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrman1
Brokeback Mountain was overrated by the concensus of critics. Imagine an interracial hetereosexual couple. Or just a plain jane heterosexual couple. Then ask how great a "love" story it was.

Exactly, just because its a male pairing should not make the movie great.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zephos
It was the story of a forbidden love, and one that is still today often considered just that, whereas interracial relationships are generally better-received.

No, it was the story of a homosexual male love. A forbidden love between a man and a woman would have been crap. And a forbidden female homosexual pairing would of made it smut.


Quote:

Originally Posted by mrman1
Munich was lesser, high-minded Speilberg (like Amistad and A.I.). Noble, but lacking the lucid intensity of Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List.

Spielberg DID have a shot of triceritops dung onscreen for a minute or so in Jurassic Park, remember? :)

In case you haven't heard, Spielberg history of popular, sentimental, and excitable filmmaking has created a backlash amongst the pointy-headed professionals of film criticism. Some defend even his worst stuff to the hilt (Armond White). Others thought even Schindler's List was kiddified.

Jurassic Park was like 10 years ago or something :/. I actually like speilberg's more recent stuff. Most of his stuff always seemed so formulaic and for mass consumption, it's not until more recently that I've felt he's actually been creating several good films within a relatively short period of time.

Misogynyst Gynecologist May 12, 2006 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dhsu
If you want an existential movie that DOESN'T suck, check out Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead.

The movie is AWFUL. The play is great.

I poked it and it made a sad sound May 12, 2006 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zephos
Er... That was the point of the movie. Not a gimmick. There would have been little to no dramatic conflict in the film had it been a "plain jane" hetero couple. It was the story of a forbidden love, and one that is still today often considered just that, whereas interracial relationships are generally better-received.

I'm going to have to go ahead and disgaree with you, here.

Brokeback Mountain, in my opinion, WAS a gimmick. It was a love story between two fags in the most unexpected of places and people.

First of all, this is not the first movie of it's kind. If you think it is, I encourage you to browse other gay/lesbian film titles. There are PLENTY out there. The only thing that made THIS movie unique is that they actually put it out in the mainstream.

Sure, it indicates that fags and dykes are being more accepted in society, but the film itself was nothing new and nothing profound. It was just a gimmick.

It was just another love story in my eyes. Another boring, bland love story.

Sorry. =/

Monkey King May 12, 2006 09:50 AM

Quote:

Posted by mrman1
Equilibrium was overrated by GFF. Worse acting than the last three Star Wars movies combined, without the badass special FX.
What astounded me the most about this was how incredibly dull the gunfights were. People were making a big deal about the gun-kata, but it doesn't even look like he's doing anything, he just waves his guns around and people die. True to how it might look in real-life, perhaps, but it makes for boring cinema. It should look like he has some method to his madness instead of coming off as a plot excuse to avoid complicated choreography.

The pistol fight at the end was badass, though. Not enough to justify sitting through the whole movie, but at least there was one worthwhile scene in it.

mrman1 May 18, 2006 07:10 PM

And THAT scene was ruined by the fact that no one was skilled enough to USE THEIR FEET!

Christ.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.