![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the fact of the matter on this issue is simply that, whether or not we approve of the conduct of Afghani officials and their people, we just don't have a choice. It's simply not our country, and by building a democracy, we turned over our right to make their laws to the people of the country. |
Quote:
Accept it or leave it,the commands have to be followed in their entirety,and if not thn even if you will "call" yourself Muslim,which evry muslim does,in reality you are hypocryte not Muslim. Its just like "you can call yourself Jew but you can only be REAL jew, if you will be born from jewish mother".Reform jews dont believe this but Orthodox ,yes. The problem lies wihtin the religion itself and defiant parties against Islam using that for their own goals,some are even bent to wipe out Islamic beliefs,we all know that. What Muslim normally think he does is right in the light of his religion, is actually a sin and totally wrong. I very well accept Adamgian when he uses word complex,its indeed complex for punkass non-muslims to understand this Religion. Double Post: Quote:
Because i know it will require research. If its in Holy book,Hadis etc tell me,i am willing to accept but don't say i am not agreeing and on what grounds you are bouncing. "I wont deny its there" where exactly? And do tell me, what Sect. you belong too. Sunni,Shia,Ismaili or sub sects of Sunnis and Shias??? |
The entire principle is based on a contentious hadith that is translated as "Whosoever changes his religion, Kill Him." It's contentious though because to issue such a penalty blindly also doesn't take into consideration the circumstances in which the hadith originally was issued - when the religion was young and fighting for survival in Medina.
Thus, the phrase exists, but at the same time, the punishment is still in a way open to interpretation depending on how you look at it. It's clearly there, it just depends on how much weight you want to apply on the circumstances. In my opinion, I feel the circumstances were dire and in a time of war, were used to prevent what was basically treason. Now however, circumstances have changed, and part of the religion is about such freedom, and instead results in a punishment upon death. Thus, I'd say the punishment is unjustifiabale today. As for my personal religious ideas, I'm Muslim, but I'll leave it at that. I'd rather not discuss personal religious beliefs. |
Quote:
|
I think it's reasonable to assume that Muslims understand what it means to be a Muslim better than a non-Muslim would, much the same way you understand what it means to be a reactionary spastic better than the rest of us. Well, with the possible exception of Billy Coen. Come to think of it, has anyone seen Coen and Wesker in the same place?
|
Quote:
I know there are Chapters and verses So what chapter no. and verse no.? I dont believe in heresay,you have to be authentic when claiming such thing. Why i asked sect. 'cause,Sunnis and Shias have different Hadis:). Double Post: Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Yeah don't "look harder" ,and advice others to "assume" that its written that way(thats where most muslims falter).
Islam isn't about assumption. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.