Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Media Centre (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Superman Returns (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=452)

Megalith May 17, 2006 11:07 AM

That's beastin'.

Did Alex Ross draw that.

Freddy Krueger May 17, 2006 01:44 PM

He almost looks as if he is about to destroy earth lol

Meth May 17, 2006 04:45 PM

That's an awesome poster, although I wish he had more of a barrel chest. He looks a bit too scrawny and emo.

Acro-nym May 17, 2006 05:42 PM

I think the fact that not too much is being said about the plot of the movie means that Warner Bros. is trying to sell this thing just from the name. "Ooh, it's Superman. He's back in theaters! You like an American icon, right?" What little I do know of the plot , I don't like.
Spoiler:
Singer's retconning the last two movies and starting over, with Big Blue having been away from Metropolis for a while. People have moved on. Did someone say "one year later?" The item that really bothers me, though, is that Lois has a kid. This is really gonna screw with the romance dynamic in Superman world...

Freddy Krueger May 17, 2006 05:54 PM

Baby mama drama = win =p

evergreen May 17, 2006 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freddy Krueger
Baby mama drama = win =p

"YOU'RE BALD!"

Meth May 18, 2006 03:51 AM

It's kinda funny how they're supposedly jumping off the point where Supes banged Lois when he became human for a short time in Superman II. They're hinting at the idea that the kid is actually his, and that he's flown away leaving a preggo lois back on earth. I guess Singer has completely forgotten that they made two other Superman movies after the 2nd one. They both sucked, but still. I think they should've just started from the beginning and did a complete retelling of the origin story.

T1249NTSCJ May 18, 2006 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetheGelfling
It's kinda funny how they're supposedly jumping off the point where Supes banged Lois when he became human for a short time in Superman II. They're hinting at the idea that the kid is actually his, and that he's flown away leaving a preggo lois back on earth. I guess Singer has completely forgotten that they made two other Superman movies after the 2nd one. They both sucked, but still. I think they should've just started from the beginning and did a complete retelling of the origin story.

Agree with you on that since WB already has a sequel in mind which'll most likely end up a trilogy.

Simo May 21, 2006 05:10 PM

The UK trailer is now online:
http://pdl.warnerbros.com/wbol/uk/mo...rf3_qt_500.mov

It's much better than the domestic trailer IMO and will most likely be the second trailer that's supposed to be attached with X-Men: The Last Stand when it opens.

Freddy Krueger May 21, 2006 05:19 PM

Wow that was badass, the last part was funny lol.

Meth May 21, 2006 06:16 PM

Is is just me, or are a lot of the promotional photos putting emphasis on weird stuff. For example: Look at the pic of Superman standing in Simo's sig. He's tipped back slightly and the S on his chest has a glare on is and is slightly out of view. But his hips are pushed forward seeming to draw attention to his crotch. I just don't get it. The S on his chest (which should be huge) should be the primary focus of the shot instead of his package.

That trailer was way more cool. Hahaha, a bullet in the eye. Geeze. Then it was like, BAM! The S!

mrman1 May 22, 2006 08:12 PM

Just heard about the $300 million budget. WTF?!?! Aside from Kevin Spacey, where is the money going? Does this film have a $250 million FX budget or something?

Misogynyst Gynecologist May 22, 2006 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetheGelfling
Is is just me, or are a lot of the promotional photos putting emphasis on weird stuff.

Its you.

Meth May 22, 2006 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrman1
Just heard about the $300 million budget. WTF?!?! Aside from Kevin Spacey, where is the money going? Does this film have a $250 million FX budget or something?

My guess is special effects. If you go to bluetights.net you can check out video journals of the production of the movie. They developed a lot of new stuff for flying rigs that probably cost a fortune. In addition, I think they pretty much built an entire airplane just for the movie.

If you count the cost of everything... including the costs of all the crap back when Tim Burton and Kevin Smith were attached to the project ages ago, it could very well be considered the most expensive movie ever made.

Soldier May 22, 2006 09:31 PM

What is this, Elitism Returns.

Leave me out of your little sex-fight, okay.

This Supes is far too skinny, that's all I can say. It's especially jarring when I've been watching the animated Superman for so many years.

http://www.geocities.com/super-mark/animated2.jpg

I know his strength is innate, but if you spend so many years lifting cars and buildings, you'd think he'd still get a bodybuilder physique.

galen May 22, 2006 09:43 PM

But it's effortless to him. It's like you lifting a gallon of milk.

Soldier May 22, 2006 09:46 PM

I've seen plenty of occasions where he's lifting something that qualifies as "heavy" to him, based on his grimacing expressions and whatnot. Super or not, I'm sure the guy gets a good workout once the day is over.

Freddy Krueger May 22, 2006 10:11 PM

Yeah but where are you gonna find someone that BIG and LOOKS like superman/clark kent and can ACT? It's not that easy hehe

Meth May 23, 2006 12:17 AM

That's true Freddy. I'm hoping that this Brandon Routh guy can act the part really well. Cause if he can't...and he doesn't even look the part... ugh. At least we can bet that Spacey will be awesome. And Kate Bosworth is nice to look at.

SketchTheArtist May 23, 2006 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDIER
What is this, Elitism Returns.

Leave me out of your little sex-fight, okay.

This Supes is far too skinny, that's all I can say. It's especially jarring when I've been watching the animated Superman for so many years.

http://www.geocities.com/super-mark/animated2.jpg

I know his strength is innate, but if you spend so many years lifting cars and buildings, you'd think he'd still get a bodybuilder physique.

Not really anticipating this movie at all but I just wanted to say that Christopher Reeves wasn't 'built' or 'muscled' at all and he still had the part.

Mobius One May 23, 2006 02:51 AM

Spoiler:
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/819...manrape1bx.gif

100 million dollar shot. Bullet-proof eyeballs ftw.

When does this come out? I'm in some serious anticipation here.

Simo May 23, 2006 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrman1
Just heard about the $300 million budget. WTF?!?! Aside from Kevin Spacey, where is the money going? Does this film have a $250 million FX budget or something?

The film doesn't have a $300 million budget. That was just some hyperbole caused by an Australian paper that reported on the budget without a source which US trades picked up on andh couldn't tell the difference between their currency and exchange rate compared to the AUD. The actual budget is around the $185 million mark.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDIER
This Supes is far too skinny, that's all I can say. It's especially jarring when I've been watching the animated Superman for so many years.

I know his strength is innate, but if you spend so many years lifting cars and buildings, you'd think he'd still get a bodybuilder physique.

http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/5393/bts0984ds.jpg

http://img438.imageshack.us/img438/33/superhr6et.jpg

How much bigger does the guy have to be then?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mobius One
When does this come out? I'm in some serious anticipation here.

June 30th in the US. :)

There are currently 4 TV spots airing in the US at the moment so here are direct links to all 4:
#1
#2
#3
#4

Meth May 23, 2006 04:12 PM

Eh, not big enough Simo. I want him to look like this:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...gdom-come1.jpg

Freddy Krueger May 23, 2006 04:26 PM

fat? =p

mrman1 May 23, 2006 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simo
The film doesn't have a $300 million budget. That was just some hyperbole caused by an Australian paper that reported on the budget without a source which US trades picked up on andh couldn't tell the difference between their currency and exchange rate compared to the AUD. The actual budget is around the $185 million mark.

So it's ONLY the 4th-most-expensive movie ever made?!?!?! :)

(Titanic, King Kong, Spiderman 2, am I right?)

But yeah, the Burton/Smith leftovers probably didn't help the budget.

And what's with the flying rig thing? Shouldn't they be doing this with green screens and computers? :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.