Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   22yr old Arrested for raping 13 yr old met online (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=23708)

RainMan Jul 30, 2007 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a lurker (Post 481378)
Are you seriously saying that a boy, who knows that orgasms are fun, was seducing an adult?

What sort of demented asshole are you?

Quit putting words in my mouth. I was saying that there was no predator and there was no prey. That was fairly simple and yet you competely misread it. Try again.

Sarag Jul 30, 2007 10:46 PM

Do you think you're so clever that no one knows what you're doing? You're defending a predatory, unstable woman and shifting some of the "blame" onto the victim because when you were thirteen you got laid. If your situation is analogous to this, you're justifying decisions thrust upon you in order to avoid the stigma of being a victim of male rape, of being deceived into thinking you want what she has to offer.

Of course, you don't think you were poorly affected by this. After all, you feel normal, right? You don't feel irrevokably damaged. Well, lest anyone thinks that statutory rape on a 13 year old boy doesn't affect the boy, here is proof positive.
http://colonelskills.belkanairforce....ages/ace/1.gif
Sociopaths think they're behaving completely rationally as well, not affected by their disorder since they make all of their decisions with a clear mind. What I'm saying is of course you can't tell how broken you are.

Sarag Jul 30, 2007 11:04 PM

Additionally, I like how rainman thinks the ability to determine you shouldn't throw animals and kick little kids means you are capable of consenting to an act that can turn you, magically, into a father.

Do you think a thirteen year old boy can be a good provider to his baby?

http://colonelskills.belkanairforce....ages/ace/1.gif

RainMan Jul 30, 2007 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghetto Fabulous D. Loco (Post 481586)
Answer my question:

Do you support stings of online predators?

Screw off bozo. I have better things to do than play one of your little games of cat and mouse. I've stated that child-sex is wrong, what more do you want? If I was a sexual predator, do you think I would readily admit it? If so, you are quite daft.

And to answer your question, yes. I hope that I've made myself clear.

Quote:

Do you think you're so clever that no one knows what you're doing? You're defending a predatory, unstable woman and shifting some of the "blame" onto the victim because when you were thirteen you got laid. If your situation is analogous to this, you're justifying decisions thrust upon you in order to avoid the stigma of being a victim of male rape, of being deceived into thinking you want what she has to offer.
Oh you again. How surprising. Is there a reason you are following me around from topic to topic like a lost puppy dog trying to nip at my heels? This is becoming habit. I encourage you to break it.

At any rate, my sexuality doesn't concern you. My argument was that I knew what I wanted/liked at that age and was sexually active. THAT'S IT, smartguy. I used that point to make an argument. No more, no less. You are reading far too much into far too little. (though its not too difficult to see why that is.)

(Judging from these run-ins we seems to be having, I am sure you get intense sexual gratification from stalking people on the internet.)

Again I am going to tell you that to question something is to concede nothing. We can consider something without acting upon it. I like to argue.
I like to consider different things contrary to what is considered common practice. This case is unique and I was interesting in discussing. What the hell about that is so difficult for you to come to grips with? I've stated that this women will go to jail and rightfully so.

Consider for a moment that I simply enjoy looking at things in a different way from time to time. You know better. Quit being so dense.

Quote:

Of course, you don't think you were poorly affected by this. After all, you feel normal, right? You don't feel irrevokably damaged. Well, lest anyone thinks that statutory rape on a 13 year old boy doesn't affect the boy, here is proof positive.
I am far from normal. (I am more honest than most.) Are you normal? If so, consider that you are completely full of shit. There is no such thing as normal. Anyone who says differently is lying. (Say what you mean. You want to find out whether I am psychotic or not? Usually I am not, but for you I am willing to make an exception.)
In any event, it doesn't hurt for me to admit what I am. I am honest with myself. ;) Other than that, I don't feel that any more input is needed. Take your pitiful psychological profiling elsewhere.

Quote:

What I'm saying is of course you can't tell how broken you are.
Please humor me. Just how broken am I? A person of your intelligence must have a rather clear cut answer to this. Actually don't. This thread isn't about me, is it? Why the hell are you so interested in what I am doing?

Additional Spam:
Quote:

Originally Posted by a lurker (Post 481595)
Additionally, I like how rainman thinks the ability to determine you shouldn't throw animals and kick little kids means you are capable of consenting to an act that can turn you, magically, into a father.

Do you think a thirteen year old boy can be a good provider to his baby?

http://colonelskills.belkanairforce....ages/ace/1.gif

I like how you are always on my nuts, slobbering like a retarded rhesus monkey who has tasted the dried shavings of its buttcrack for the first time. Seriously! :) Its great!

Bradylama Jul 31, 2007 01:30 AM

Quote:

I have better things to do than play one of your little games of cat and mouse.
Quote:

And to answer your question, yes.
Devo's got The Power.

Quote:

This is becoming habit. I encourage you to break it.
I would encourage you to just stop posting. Before you dig any deeper holes with droll reasoning and overreactions.

It is not normal to have been sexually active at 13. It's not normal at all.

koifox Jul 31, 2007 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bradylama (Post 481490)
What your logic inevitably arrives at, is that if something is not wrong, then why should it be illegal?

Many dangerous things are against the law because there is risk, even though they can be done many times without actual injury. (And to some degree the governments enact laws to babysit children, since the modern economy forces or at least rewards workaholic parents over properly raising and policing their kids. I don't think pedophilia laws fall under that though.)

In this particular instance, I suppose that with the long court case, the mother going to jail, the kid bouncing around foster homes, is all going to irreparably damage the kid, but in this case I think the justice system is going to do a lot more damage than peer awe ever could have, in the name of doing less damage in the vast majority of cases. But that's how society works, I guess, sacrifice the few to save the many.

Sarag Jul 31, 2007 12:53 PM

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You're exceptionally hostile and defensive when someone brings up the fact that a) you are not behaving in an acceptable manner, and b) you were in all likelihood raped as a child and enjoyed it, information you volunteered. Who was it? Was it family?

http://colonelskills.belkanairforce....ages/ace/1.gif

koifox Jul 31, 2007 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a lurker (Post 481568)
Of course, you don't think you were poorly affected by this. After all, you feel normal, right? You don't feel irrevokably damaged. Well, lest anyone thinks that statutory rape on a 13 year old boy doesn't affect the boy, here is proof positive.
Sociopaths think that Ace Combat is the greatest thing ever made, rather than the awesomeness of Cave Story, having been skullraped by millions of italian sausage cocks as children.

You're arguing with the posterboy for irrevocably damaged over there, don't even bother.

Sarag Jul 31, 2007 01:03 PM

I think we can reach a breakthrough here, to be honest. I think we can cut through the defensive mechanisms and start the healing.

Divest Jul 31, 2007 03:57 PM

I'm ears. I wouldn't mind seeing Rainman break down and confess all the details of his childhood filled of sodomy.

Chibi Neko Jul 31, 2007 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bradylama (Post 481674)
It is not normal to have been sexually active at 13. It's not normal at all.

But the sad thing is it happens, I remember back in school how 13 and 14 year olds would brag how hey lost their virginity over the weekend, I would like to think they where making it up, but these days it's hard to tell.

RainMan Jul 31, 2007 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bradylama (Post 481674)
Before you dig any deeper holes with droll reasoning and overreactions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bradylama (Post 481674)
Are you fucking daft?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bradylama (Post 481674)
I am right, lurker is right, Dev is right, and you are out of your fucking mind if you think that 13 year olds can make informed decisions concerning sexual behavior.

You are immature.

Quote:

Originally Posted by D-Loc (Post 481968)
I'm ears. I wouldn't mind seeing Rainman break down and confess all the details of his childhood filled of sodomy.

Yea, I guess you need some new jerkoff material to accompany the plethora of beastiality and german scat vids which line your hard drive. Go read a book you tool!

Quote:

Originally Posted by a lurker (Post 481884)
I think we can reach a breakthrough here, to be honest.

lol.

Bradylama Jul 31, 2007 04:45 PM

Quote:

You are immature.
NO U

"Oh this rape here might not be so bad, why are you getting so angry?"

koifox Jul 31, 2007 06:16 PM

I guess it's easy to see rape secreting from every dark alley's orifices when rainman is the lawyer for the defense. He's probably outside lurking in a trenchcoat in a park in the hundred degree weather right now.

Chibi Neko Jul 31, 2007 06:30 PM

I have been reading this thread over and over.... I fail to see how Rainizzle is justifying this crime. Ture what this woman did was wrong and she did prey on his naive age, but don't forget it is the 'law' that says 13 year olds are incapable of giving consent, 13 year old kids today do have the ability to say 'yes' or 'no' wither it is under manipulation or not, if the kid knew the meaning behind his answer is a case by case basis, the law does not say that someone considerd minor cannot say yes or no.

Yes this boy most likely did not know what he was doing, and yes the woman most likely preyed on him because of his naive age, but the point is that the idea that kids his age are 'incapable' of saying the words yes or no is preposterous, when I was 13 I said 'no' many times when I was told to wash the dishes or clean my room.

Bradylama Jul 31, 2007 07:42 PM

Quote:

when I was 13 I said 'no' many times when I was told to wash the dishes or clean my room.
Aw man. How can you not get this?

RainMan Jul 31, 2007 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghetto Fabulous D. Loco (Post 482044)
I handled it fine at 13 why can't you let this kid.

You're a fucking joke Rainman. Is there anything more pathetic than a victim trying to justify the same crime dealt to someone else?

I didn't say I was 13, I said I was around that age and its clear through my commentary leading up to this point that 'victim' is not a term which is free of argument. I have mentioned this many times, and yet it keeps slipping through your fumblesome fingers. Its making you look like quite the tard.

Now that we have that out of the way, I don't believe you really have anything else of substance to say, hmm?

Bradylama Jul 31, 2007 07:58 PM

There are a couple of ages around that age. Two of them, in fact.

Do not act like a faggot if you cannot communicate.

RainMan Jul 31, 2007 08:00 PM

So I am a faggot now? (And you think I can't communicate?) Not only are you racist, but a homophobe as well. (neither instance is surprising) Its all becoming quite clear regarding the conservative and supposed rationale that you bring forth. Let me ask you, are you a Republican? lol

I didn't state my age implicitly. Get over it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chibi Neko (Post 482060)
I have been reading this thread over and over.... I fail to see how Rainizzle is justifying this crime.

I appreciate your reading comprehension, but you should be weary. These fine folks might burn you at the stake for these transgressions.

koifox Jul 31, 2007 08:18 PM

Around here, nigger and faggot are like pal and chum. Brady is a loony libertarian. You did, in fact, state your age implicitly, but not explicitly. And it's 'wary'. That's four strikes in four statements, gg.

Bradylama Jul 31, 2007 08:54 PM

As a loony libertarian I support the right of every Arab to set fire to his local McAckbar's.

Quote:

Not only are you racist
Being open-minded doesn't mean you have to accept all backwards superstitious nonsense because it's different from the way you live. At some point you have to come to terms with the fact that many aspects of a culture are wrong, and simply because they are different from you does not make it ok.

Sarag Jul 31, 2007 09:04 PM

Do you have any idea how much a person's brain can grow and mature around thirteen? I'm betting if you were "around 13", you were probably closer to 15. That is significant.

Do you think a thirteen year old has the capabilities to deal with a pregnancy he caused?

http://colonelskills.belkanairforce....ages/ace/1.gif


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.