Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghetto Fabulous D. Loco
(Post 481586)
Answer my question:
Do you support stings of online predators?
|
Screw off bozo. I have better things to do than play one of your little games of cat and mouse. I've stated that child-sex is wrong, what more do you want? If I
was a sexual predator, do you think I would readily admit it? If so, you are quite daft.
And to answer your question, yes. I hope that I've made myself clear.
Quote:
Do you think you're so clever that no one knows what you're doing? You're defending a predatory, unstable woman and shifting some of the "blame" onto the victim because when you were thirteen you got laid. If your situation is analogous to this, you're justifying decisions thrust upon you in order to avoid the stigma of being a victim of male rape, of being deceived into thinking you want what she has to offer.
|
Oh you again. How surprising. Is there a reason you are following me around from topic to topic like a lost puppy dog trying to nip at my heels? This is becoming habit. I encourage you to break it.
At any rate, my sexuality doesn't concern you. My argument was that I knew what I wanted/liked at that age and was sexually active. THAT'S IT, smartguy. I used that point to make an argument. No more, no less. You are reading far too much into far too little. (though its not too difficult to see why that is.)
(Judging from these run-ins we seems to be having, I am sure you get intense sexual gratification from stalking people on the internet.)
Again I am going to tell you that to question something is to concede nothing. We can consider something without acting upon it. I like to argue.
I like to consider different things contrary to what is considered common practice. This case is unique and I was interesting in discussing. What the hell about that is so difficult for you to come to grips with? I've stated that this women will go to jail and rightfully so.
Consider for a moment that I simply enjoy looking at things in a different way from time to time. You know better. Quit being so dense.
Quote:
Of course, you don't think you were poorly affected by this. After all, you feel normal, right? You don't feel irrevokably damaged. Well, lest anyone thinks that statutory rape on a 13 year old boy doesn't affect the boy, here is proof positive.
|
I am far from normal. (I am more honest than most.) Are you normal? If so, consider that you are completely full of shit. There is no such thing as normal. Anyone who says differently is
lying. (Say what you mean. You want to find out whether I am psychotic or not? Usually I am not, but for you I am willing to make an exception.)
In any event, it doesn't hurt for me to admit what I am. I am honest with myself. ;) Other than that, I don't feel that any more input is needed. Take your pitiful psychological profiling elsewhere.
Quote:
What I'm saying is of course you can't tell how broken you are.
|
Please humor me. Just how broken am I? A person of your intelligence must have a rather clear cut answer to this. Actually don't. This thread isn't about me, is it? Why the hell are you so interested in what I am doing?
Additional Spam:
Quote:
Originally Posted by a lurker
(Post 481595)
Additionally, I like how rainman thinks the ability to determine you shouldn't throw animals and kick little kids means you are capable of consenting to an act that can turn you, magically, into a father.
Do you think a thirteen year old boy can be a good provider to his baby?
http://colonelskills.belkanairforce....ages/ace/1.gif
|
I like how you are always on my nuts, slobbering like a retarded rhesus monkey who has tasted the dried shavings of its buttcrack for the first time. Seriously! :) Its great!