What a waste of fucking time. I got done with it and it told me it couldn't calculate for whatever reason, so I have no matches. That's pretty fucking stupid.

This happened to me, as well. Also, it doesn't like gay people. Apparently the founder is some sort of evangelist.

I've taken this (huge) test by the sake of getting the personality report, since I don't believe in Internet matching.

It has an absurdly high amount of questions, and (although I wasn't actually interested on it) I've got no matches. Zero. What a waste of time :lolsign:

It's still stupid to turn away potential customers because they're fags. Way to lose out on a lot of sales.

WHAT!?
Are you serious!? o_o;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

You're a really nice guy and not to mention, friggin' hot x__x;;

Y u sign up for crap? D:

Haha, I'm in shock <<;;
and this is only because I've met you irl once ;-; I never in my wildest dreams would imagine you having a problem finding a girlfriend (or a boyfriend, whichever you prefer :3 )

Well, then. Problem solved, Skexis. Looks like GFF is working out better for you than eharmony did!

It sounds like they're getting fat off the hopes of the desperate, to me. There's nothing wrong with meeting people on the internet in and of itself, but paying $110 for an online matching service is the very definition of desperate. And I'm sorry, but desperate people tend not to be the most ideal mates. It'd be fun to try for a lark were it free, but that's just a borderline scam, considering you're essentially throwing a hail Mary pass.

You know, going out to bars and clubs to meet people, paying for cover charges and drinks and also first dates with people you have nothing in common with just so that you can find this out also costs money. It ends up costing a great deal more than eharmony does.

Listen, all joking aside and I truly don't mean this in a mean way AT ALL, but if you're "desperate" (Monkey, I'm assuming by "desperate" you mean someone who has basically given up all hope on meeting someone in person) you want someone else who's desperate, too. It seems like online dating services would be great for people who a) aren't "shallow" and don't care about physical attributes or chemistry - and there are people like this; and b) for whatever reason have given up hope of finding someone by meeting them in person.

Sorry weirdo, already taken and engaged to someone else. ._.;

However, I still find it shocking, since Skexis is a hawty >.>;

But I'd wager it's considerably more enjoyable. $110, or $150AU is a pretty decent night out on the pull. $0-30 for cover, $10 a drink (roughly), transport not factored into it. That's still going to be around 10 drinks, plenty enough to have for your self, and for anyone that catches your eye.
Fair enough that won't last you three months or what ever, but I'd find it alot more enjoyable than sitting at home pining over a username or shit quality picture.

Well, I think the point is that you would meet them eventually, peeack. You know, like Kip and LaFawnduh.

I'm sorry Alice, I don't understand the reference.

Then there is no hope for you. ;_;

I'm not talking about going to bars for fun, peeack. If you're doing that, then you're not seriously looking for someone at a bar. For the people who are seriously looking, it makes more sense, at least from a financial standpoint, to use eharmony.

Says you perhaps, but I disagree!

How... clinical.

Or, you know, going to Borders and buying a book and a cup of coffee for $10 and seeing if theres any cute girls walking around?

Just quoting, you know, for truth.

Heck, you don't even have to buy the coffee. Just pretend like you're buying something, and "Whoa, chicks actually like reading THAT? Score!"

Still, it sucks that eHarmony rejected ya'll (myself included). Apparantly love and gamers don't mix...

How often does that work? Picking up chicks at Borders. If anyone has started a relationship that began with a conversation at a book store, I'd love to hear about it. Now, I'm not saying it can't happen, but the amount of coffee you'd have to drink would not only surpass eharmony in cost, but would probably also land you in the hospital over heart failure from the caffiene.

I got numbers a couple of times, but nothing big or mystical or amazing really came of a couple of dates.

See, meeting people the conventional way is kinda hard. I can't help but wonder if you are severely limiting your choices by choosing to do so.

May I suggest tittybars, gangbangs or crackhouses, Minion?

You're just coming up with excuses. See, I loathe people. People are these jelly-like creatures that slime their way through life without giving a shit about anything outside of their own tiny corner of the world. I'm fucking bitter because I'm the most obscenely staunch optimist you'd ever meet when it comes to people - but I'm proven wrong day after day after day. Embittered, angry - I go on being optimistic because I have once in a great while been proven wrong by people, only to have those same people taken from me somehow.

But those few people fuel me. They make me realize that if I'm going to Hell, I'll be in the best of company. Fucking and drinking in Satan's shitty little basement, I'll be the one who stopped making excuses and acted on stuff. Stop being this small-dicked bitch who's looking for an out before the game has even started for you.

I limit myself by my experiences through people, especially women.

So, you don't like the suggestion of difficulty, then? How about inefficient? Does that work?

What are you, the fucking Borg or something?

"Meeting people is inefficient. You must assimiliate into the collective."