Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Board Support (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   What happened to the custom display names? (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=9489)

galen Jul 21, 2006 09:39 PM

I voted yes. applebees must return!!!!!

I guess GFF is just too much serious business for fun! We are all very professional people with very dry senses of humor and well thought out and poignant opinions of a variety of topics, after all!

Kairyu Jul 21, 2006 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luxo
bobo probably removed it because he has no friends.

Low blow to bobo, Luxo. Low blow. :edgartpg:

Kamui Jul 21, 2006 09:57 PM

Useless feature really. Don't see why there should be drama about it.

eriol33 Jul 21, 2006 10:02 PM

No, I think it's useful, this is alternative if we are bored with username, and want to revert it to original anytime. I think it's more efficient than requesting admin to change your name when you want one.:(

galen Jul 21, 2006 10:03 PM

Not useless. Unnecessary, yes, but not useless.

Elixir Jul 21, 2006 10:33 PM

Poll's winning by a landslide.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Styphon
Thanks, bobo, for removing a feature I never had to see (because I turned them off at the first opportunity) but still didn't like.

Birds of a feather.

Tails Jul 21, 2006 11:16 PM

Gooks up in here.

I don't mind the feature. I'd probably enable it from time to time just to see what silly shit people set their names as. I don't plan on using it myself since I like having people not be able to track what my actual username is, plus it makes me feel special that the admins <3 me enough to do so. >_>

>________________________________________>

<________________________________________<

Solis Jul 21, 2006 11:23 PM

I don't really see a reason to remove it, especially when the reason for it's implimentation to begin with was to make name-change themes less of an annoyance for admins and removing the problem of people not being able to tell who is who during that time. I'm not sure why it's any different than custom titles or signatures, since those are features that don't serve much purpose and can be disabled as well (although they're enabled by default).

Sarag Jul 21, 2006 11:37 PM

Why lie; bobo removed it because bobo didn't add it.

Also, I think blah implemented the sticky seprator.

packrat Jul 21, 2006 11:43 PM

I completely loved this feature.

Aside from the worn arguments that everyone else has given tenfold, I'd just like to say a few things from a newbie's perspective.

I find that this is a very attractive option to just about ANY forum. I have wandered around the internet, and this is the first forum I have seen which has offered such features (At least for little effort. Some have used "post point" systems, where you can essentially spam your way into a name change. This, of course, is not the way to do things).

I think that, as a forum which continually has these sorts of small fun things appended to it here and there, it stands above the rest. Many administrators I have seen are wary of doing any fancy edits with their forum code, and utilize their super-powers for only installing standard software updates.

Boring. :(

Little Shithead Jul 22, 2006 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a lurker
Also, I think blah implemented the sticky seprator.

Actually, believe it or not, that was Miles.

mortis Jul 22, 2006 12:01 AM

I, myself, rarely ever used it. However, the logic for getting rid of it is beyond me....

Chaotic Lullaby Jul 22, 2006 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kamui
Useless feature really. Don't see why there should be drama about it.

because this is gff, and drama is what gff does best.

anyway, i call bullshit on removing display names. they're CONFUSING? how stupid do you think people ARE.

"enable display names what the fuck is this? WHOA SHIT, WHAT JUST HAPPENED. O JESUS ALL THE NAMES HAVE CHANGED, NEVER COMING TO GAMINGFORCE AGAIN, TOO CONFUSING."

Sarag Jul 22, 2006 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merv Burger
Actually, believe it or not, that was Miles.

Shenanigans. All Miles can do is kick me in chat.

eriol33 Jul 22, 2006 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaotic Lullaby
because this is gff, and drama is what gff does best.

anyway, i call bullshit on removing display names. they're CONFUSING? how stupid do you think people ARE.

"enable display names what the fuck is this? WHOA SHIT, WHAT JUST HAPPENED. O JESUS ALL THE NAMES HAVE CHANGED, NEVER COMING TO GAMINGFORCE AGAIN, TOO CONFUSING."

You have two options if you dont like this feature: 1. Turning it off on your control panel option, 2. Clicking the user name to view its real name.

And also, to avoid confusion I usually use same sig so people could identify me easily.

I poked it and it made a sad sound Jul 22, 2006 01:22 AM

Can I ask a silly question? A really stupid one? Since there seems to be drama around this, and for my own curiosity, what the hell did this feature do?

Are you telling me that during gonk week, I could have displayed all of those name changes to their original names for my personal viewing experience?

Could someone explain what it did? I get the impression this was a chat thing, so if thats the case, I am sorry. ;_;

YO PITTSBURGH MIKE HERE Jul 22, 2006 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassafrass
Can I ask a silly question? A really stupid one? Since there seems to be drama around this, and for my own curiosity, what the hell did this feature do?

Are you telling me that during gonk week, I could have displayed all of those name changes to their original names for my personal viewing experience?

Could someone explain what it did? I get the impression this was a chat thing, so if thats the case, I am sorry. ;_;

I'm pretty amazed you completely missed this. Alright, it was a mod Blah installed that made it possible to change your display name, the one that'd appear next to posts, at will. He also made an option to turn them off and on, as well as which way you would see the changed names. It was also possible to click the usernames and see their original one in the postbit.

Chaotic Lullaby Jul 22, 2006 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassafrass
Are you telling me that during gonk week, I could have displayed all of those name changes to their original names for my personal viewing experience?

this was the basic idea, though it wasn't implemented for gonk week.

here's how it worked: in your profile, there was a field for a display name. you could put a name up to 15 characters here, and this is the name that would display on your postbit.

however, this name would only appear to other users who had the option for display names left on. and to those who could see it, there was a notification of their choice (the name could either blink, marquee, or be followed by an asterisk) that this was, indeed, a display name. a simple click on the name would reveal the dropdown menu, at the top of which the users original name was displayed. it would also only appear in postbits; the original name would be shown everywhere else (ie, journals/comments, and in the 'last post by')

or you could just turn them off and not have to see them.

admins didn't have to deal with namechange requests anymore, but the people who wanted namechanges could have them. it was easy to keep track of who was who with a simple mouseclick. people who found namechanges annoying didn't have to see them. EVERYONE WAS HAPPY.

scotty Jul 22, 2006 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassafrass
Can I ask a silly question? A really stupid one? Since there seems to be drama around this, and for my own curiosity, what the hell did this feature do?

Are you telling me that during gonk week, I could have displayed all of those name changes to their original names for my personal viewing experience?

Could someone explain what it did? I get the impression this was a chat thing, so if thats the case, I am sorry. ;_;

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassafrass
Can I ask a silly question? A really stupid one? Since there seems to be drama around this, and for my own curiosity, what the hell did this feature do?

Are you telling me that during gonk week, I could have displayed all of those name changes to their original names for my personal viewing experience?

Could someone explain what it did? I get the impression this was a chat thing, so if thats the case, I am sorry. ;_;

heres the thread made back when it was still a feature:

Custom name changes thread

includes pics

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaotic Lullaby
EVERYONE WAS HAPPY.

except bobo :(

UltimaIchijouji Jul 22, 2006 02:13 AM

bobo's happiness is irrelevant. If we are happy, bobo should be happy. This is how Gamingforce should work.

But obviously, this is not how Gamingforce is working. Gamingforce seems to be broken.

Gamingforce needs to be fixed. Fix Gamingforce.

eriol33 Jul 22, 2006 02:14 AM

Now, why bobo actually removed this feature?

Chaotic Lullaby Jul 22, 2006 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scotty
except bobo :(

well yes the implication was that everyone was happy UNTIL BOBO TOOK IT AWAY.

NOW THERE IS ONLY MANLY RAGE.

galen Jul 22, 2006 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eriol33
Now, why bobo actually removed this feature?

Here is a quote directly from Bobsy himself:

Quote:

I love the work Bigblah is putting into the site but some features just don't make any sense from a usability perspective. Display names is one of the few. I want to bring consistency to the entire place, not have every possbile aspect modifiable. The username is one of the few constants about a user and having graphics or blank usernames to display adds no functional aspect to the site and makes things downright confusing.
So, okay. Inconsistency. He wants things to be consistent.

And hey, I can't blame him. I'm a big fan of consistency! I like things predictable too. In fact, I think we should go ahead and set the current avatars and signatures in stone. In the name of consistency, of course.

Dark Nation Jul 22, 2006 03:47 AM

Yes, I enjoyed the OPTIONAL, NOT OBLIGATORY, ACTIVATED BY PERSONAL CHOICE & SELF-ACTION, 100% REMOVEABLE Custom titles, so I voted Yes.

Congle line of abuse. Or is that conga-line. Or congaline. Jul 22, 2006 04:36 AM

Everyone voted yes so kiss this sweet feature goodbye forever and advertisements.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.