Jesus, with the standards some of you people have, one must wonder how you are able to look in the mirror every day without throwing up.

It's going to be great when some of you guys become fathers or just hit 30 and you find all the women you get involved with have hanging fat aprons, fuzzy C-section scars, grotesque stretch marks, and saggy boobs, going by how poorly you're handling a heavily airbrushed pregnant woman.

Women do not age like men. Point blank. It's unfortunate, but what can you do? That's why you're supposed to enjoy the ten or fifteen good years we're given and take up golfing for the rest. Or just get over it and forgive your wife for it like she's forgiving you for going bald and getting a beer gut.

I like everything Aardork and pisscart deluxe just said. How can anyone say it better?

But, I do think that having a c-section JUST because you want to save your looks (not that it particularly does that) is a poor reason. Because however common and safe the procedure may be, it usually does hold more risk than a vaginal birth. There has also been evidence that a vaginal birth helps the baby in terms of releasing certain hormones, etc. It's just healthier!

That being said, c-sections are definitely necessary in some cases.

This could be a frontrunner for weakest thread in the history of the world.
"she looks ugly with black hair"
"ugh, pregnancy reminds me of sex, URGH"
"i hate britneys music this isn't gunna save her carear lol"

Get the fuck out. Britney Spears can do whatever the fuck she wants and look however she fucking pleases. She's young and pregnant. How is this even worthy of attention?

hehehe... :)

I guarantee you that every single one of the guys who posted in this thread would fuck her, given the chance.

I wonder what women and men you've been looking at.

It's all empirical; making a sweeping statement like that just doesn't fly.

Of course it's a sweeping generalization - but even people who take great care of themselves end up aging and getting some battle scars from life (like from pregnancy). It's expected and normal. Not to mention I wasn't completely serious. ;(

That makes it sound better than the more sexist overlays I read it first as. =(

On the not being serious note, it's also not as if everyone here just snubs celebrities for a living here either. Saying Jessica Simpson looks like crap as a redhead doesn't mean she's not pretty either. Or saying that one crappy photo spread of Britney Spears is hiding some hidden psychological meanings in our "miserable ugly lives" anyway.

You know. I am not saying this because I hate Brittany. I am saying this as a woman.

I fucking HATE THE NOTION of a woman posing like that when she's MOTHERFUCKING PREGNANT. First of all, yes, you're with child - but for fuck's sakes, HAVE SOME DIGNITY.

Secondly. What is UP with the hair. I don't believe she actually dyed her hair black. Because LOOK at that shit. It looks as though it's falling away from her scalp. Is it a wig or is Brittany losing her hair.

Thirdly - she looks like hell. Trash. Absolute trash. Maybe it's the fact that I have a serious problem with women who are pregnant acting like slutwhores posing with expensive jewlery, hideous fauxfur, and a really bad tan.

Is it so much to ask that expecting mothers act dignified in some sense? Is it REALLY THAT HARD to keep your motherfucking CLOTHES ON while you're with child?

I know the female figure with child should be celebrated, but this, in my opinion, is exploitation.

Also - that shit has been so airbrushed, its not even fucking FUNNY. Its like they FABRICATE a product, here. THERE IS NO PRODUCT.