How about we just get that white dude from Dragon Ball: Evolution? Or Jimmy Fallon!

http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...achiralulz.jpg

Oh come on Rotor you know just as well as I do. I'm not trying to hate, just keepin' it real.

They didn't cast Casshern for every part in this live action adaptation, so it's already failed to meet my expectations.

are you speaking of the live action casshern? because aritisticly, the movie looked good, the rest not so much.

You'll think I'm being sarcastic here, but I meant that they just get still frames from Casshern Sins and modify them accordingly.

It's a horrible way of trying to target those that don't know of the series though. :erm: I mean with all the stuff that shows, you'd think Hollywood would have learned a lesson by now.

Thing is, if anything they should at least have some form of consistency, considering that if they want to appeal to other masses, because if someone found the movie remotely interesting then they may want to see the origin/basis of the movie, and thus probably one of the reasons why people may be raging at this, is the reason of association.

But aside from all that, we can't really pass judgment upon this, because we don't know of the outcome yet. :p

Americans make Imagine DS games top sellers, I really don't think there's a lesson to be learned about quality in this country.

I also love how all these people screaming about how they won't go see it if they change anything about the original CARTOON when it is made into a FILM would probably just download it anyway. And if they are that rare anime faggot that leaves their home, they're going to go see it anyway because its an anime and they can do cosplay or whatever idiotic bullshit they think is cool.

You kids can complain all you want, but the lack of understanding on how making a film from source material actually works is stunning.

Huh. I wonder why a DP, Director and producing team wouldn't want to produce something exactly the same as what someone had already done. I mean, I'm sure being the film-equivalent of a fucking tracer is wicked rewarding, right? It's not like people in the industry would lose respect for you because you just flatout remade something instead of making it new and different.

No, not at all.

If you want to see the cartoon, watch the fucking cartoon. Otherwise shut up.

I think you're all missing the important question:




Are they gonna get a black guy to play Jet?




Is Sassupants going to play Faye? She has the tits for it!

I don't see why they need a movie at all. But whateva!

They aren't? Why can't they make it for me and the people who have never heard of Cowboy Bebop?

I wanna know who's going to play Ed.

Dakota Fanning, of course.

Is Devon Aoki in there somewhere. Cause I know she'll be somewhere.

This would just blow, there would be no way to redeem the movie if they did this. That being said a live action version is bound to ruin it. However I can bet a movie would be action based. Even the movie has very little action in it.

Was that a complete thought or, like, twelve fragments crammed into four sentences?




THINK BEFORE YOU POST.

It's okay. This thread was doomed the minute it got titled "beebop."

So because I don't know the entire process of making a movie, I can't complain about the quality I'm expecting from it?

I think a Bebop movie would be pretty rad, though I'm pretty much completely unexcited at the prospect of Keanu playing Spike. Casting him for Spike makes as much sense as replacing Kiefer Sutherland with Carrot Top for a 24 movie.

And I thought the nerdrage surrounding Watchmen was embarassing. This is several shades worse. :(

I thought the nerdrage surrounding Watchmen was because Fox is being a bunch of assholes over something that was Warner Brothers' IP to begin with.

Okay, so an action movie with action in it would suck?

Is that what you're saying?

So, what's next? Porn with no sex?

What film makers need to remember is this:

When you make a movie based on an anime--do NOT make the movie look like an anime....

Actually, the problem is that Warner Bros never bothered to buy out some (distribution?) rights from Fox that they've had (and admittedly never used) since the early 1990s.

As it is - Fox is totally in the right. WB just looks lazy.

Fox being in the right or not doesn't make them any less of a bunch of assholes about this.

Yes, protecting stuff you own from your competitors using it without paying for it is a really horrible thing to do. Why can't everyone just get along?

But see, WB should have done that in the FIRST PLACE. Also, at this point Fox isn't really protecting it so much as denying the public the ability to see it with this "delay of release" thing. If they were that interested in protecting it, they would have stopped the movie either before or during production.

Hence, assholes.