Indeed, and remember:

Coming in 2008, the sequel:

Snakes on a Submarine

Slither looks like it actually has wit though. Like it'll be funny scary, Evil Dead style.

Snakes on a Plane is just fucking insane.

But, JT, that is what makes it so Oscar-worthy.

...which was said already just a few posts above yours...

That's what I was quoting, and why I said "remember". :dopey_love:

It was in response to the "Samuel must be desperate" business.

If all the snakes are poisonous, why the hell was there an anaconda (it came crashing down through the lights or something)?

That's the end of level boss.

I don't see the correlation between Samuel being desperate for roles and him wanting the name "Snakes on a Plane"

Oh and don't forget to check this new trailer in case you missed it in a previous post

Well, at the end of the day, it's Samuel L. Jackson — to think that he'd take on something like this out of acting desperation as opposed to finding the name and concept absolutely hilarious as various accounts would imply seems kind of preposterous to me.

Maybe I just don't know much about the whole acting scene, though. :(

That's what most base actors WOULD do, actually, now that I think about it. Not just Samuel.

I had a dream about this movie. It sucked.

(But only because I got my face eaten)

I want one of those shirts. They are most righteous.

I agree — I think I might order one next week.

Also, enemy list.

:lolsign:

YES YES YES YES YES
The ending was the best part.

why do you fail at punctuation.

sup, worst film of the year?
Samuel L. Jackson really can't say no, can he?

That movie may be the coming of Armageddon, but damn, those t-shirts ROCK. I want one.

Seriously.

You don't get it. It's terrible, yes, but that's why it's going to be so good. That's why he did it, because it's just so stupid. Just thinking of the title makes me laugh. SNAKES ON A PLANE.

Everything about it is bad. Bad acting, bad special effects, bad dialog, but it's completely intentional.

It's one thing to try to make a serious movie and have it turn out awful, but to make an awful movie and know you're doing it from the start? Well, it works for the Wayans brothers.

I wasn't aware that there was something to "get".
the fact that the idea is ridiculous and the film will be more of a comedy than a horror flick is far from above my head, my friend. but the fact that it looks absurdly hilarious doesn't make it any better. shit, I will definately still see it, even if it is making the Larry the Cable Guy movie look like fucking art house material.
I was just amazed that, given his abilities, Samuel L. Jackson still finds time to do movies like Deep Blue Sea, the Man, and, of course, Snakes On A Plane.

OH SNAP

Next movie: SHARKS ON A TRAIN

I keep hoping that he'll die the same he did in Deep Blue Sea. while giving a motivational speech.

Just one question: Is the movie intended to be a spoof/ a movie that knows its bad?

I might just order one of those shirts.

Yes.

It's supposed to be a callback to old stupid B-movies.

HYDRA MUCH!?1

I heard about this over on GAF, and just about every place I've frequented has been talking about this flick.... simply because of the name. Either way, it sounds like a B-movie spoof like most others have said.

I'll one-up you, galen. How about Sharks on the Soul Train.